dark light

emile

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 525 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 16 #2282151
    emile
    Participant

    I am thinking the internal fuel J-10 carried would be more than 3000kg or a little bit less?

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2282645
    emile
    Participant

    My WZ-19 collection.

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2282659
    emile
    Participant

    Now that’s clear the J-10 empty weight around 9000 kg, never been 9.7 ton

    in reply to: FTC-2000G vs FC-1 #2282781
    emile
    Participant

    looks like people wanting a new modernized MiG-21 now have an option

    There will be no optimization within option of surpuls. This is Chinese style today, exactly same as early era of capitalism.:cool:

    in reply to: PLAAF Thread 15 #2282941
    emile
    Participant

    This we call it KittyDragon :diablo:

    in reply to: Can anyine identify this helicopter ? #2283116
    emile
    Participant

    The lost child of Sikorsky X2 mockup and Eurocopter X3.
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=209480&stc=1&d=1352634990
    http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/X2-LTH-mockup_042709-129A.jpg
    http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/images/stories/large/2010/09/28/eurocopter_104484015.jpg

    those two reminds me of sth Russian…..

    in reply to: F-15 vs. Su-27 #2304685
    emile
    Participant

    Could you show me IRST device mounted on F-102, F-106 and F-104?

    in reply to: Shenyang J-21/31/F-60/AMF thread part 1 #2305732
    emile
    Participant

    take off what? lol
    this aircraft is belong to project 310, therefor, the official designation won’t be J-31

    in reply to: Shenyang J-21/31/F-60/AMF thread part 1 #2305773
    emile
    Participant

    overview.

    in reply to: F-15 vs. Su-27 #2310140
    emile
    Participant

    Interesting!, was your attached image indicating that Su-27 would has somewhat advantage against F-15, even F-15’s advantage present in high speed region?

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2312937
    emile
    Participant

    leaving question for arrangement of Su-17’s pylons

    it seems there are five pylons under fuselage of Su-17, however, it also seems there is one lost from rear?

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2312943
    emile
    Participant

    Cy-17

    😀

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2313174
    emile
    Participant

    Very informative references.

    If somebody were as quick as possible to join my group, then nothing can be surprising here, it is natural that so-called stealth is determined by component of material more than angle.

    It doesn’t have curved ducts…. it isn’t like the F-22….
    IT CAN’T BE STEALTHY

    F-22 is never Chariots of the Gods. The blocker works better than your curve.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2314159
    emile
    Participant

    If the VC turbofan would be used on PAKFA, it will be 4.5(5.5) generation fighter.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2315267
    emile
    Participant

    maximum extra-payload of PAKFA

    three 3000L fuel tanks
    four X-31 A2G missiles
    scale: assumed the wingspan for PAKFA is 14 meters
    😀

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 525 total)