sigh do u even know what ships PN operates? everythin except for agosta90b is older than most IN vessels how is avg age more. unless u decided to not include any vessels as being part of PN except for 90B SSK :rolleyes:
let see
PN
Amazon FFG:27-30 yrs
Leander FFG:33+ yrs
Daphne SSK:35+ yrs old
Agosta:25 yrs
Agosta 90b:1 to 5 yrsIN
Delhi:4 to 8 yrs
Kashin:17 to 25
Talwar:3 yrs
P-16A:~ 3yrs
Leander:24 to 29 yrs
Godavri:19-22 yrs
Khukri:2 to 16 yrs
Kilo:5 to 19 yrs
So do you think Shipe built in ex-soviet union or India has the same life as built in France and UK?. that is complete joke comparision. otherwise all Russian navy would not be rusting.
The basic point is PN like PAF can maintain its things very well unlike on otheriside of the border which keep crashing.
and how many are the new ships relative to over all fleet?
todays trivia quiz: how old is the newest principal surface combatant in the PN ?
what is the average age of their submarine fleet ?
the average age of PN ships and submarines is alot less than Indian counterpart. just look at number of IN submarines. i cant believe anyone is 20 year younger. 85 of 140 IN ships are ready for retirement.
Yes, Indians strictly stick to yet undeveloped and twice-as-expensive BARS-29 with phase-array antenna only because it ‘ain’t that much better’. Very sensible…
where is sign report that India has ordered Bar-29 for MIG-29K?. it is more Russian marketing that they can develop it in 3 or 4 years if order is placed.
No, they will be newly built airframes built for South Africa. So they are “extras” added to the 204 that were ordered for Sweden.
I must say that I’m a bit sceptical about the price information in DN that I quoted yesterday. If Gripen really is that cheap, it would be a bit more interesting to buy it, I guess.
I just mentioned it because it’s so rare to see any price tag at all on Gripen…Regards
this may be the price of JAS-39A. JAS-39C is likely to be more expensive.
now about the radar. now evidence for Bars-29 (i doubt it is much better).
Interfax-AVN military news agency web site, Moscow, in Russian 0941 12 Apr 05/BBC Monitoring/(c) BBC
Excerpt from report by Russian news agency Interfax-AVN web siteMoscow, 12 April: The MiG-29K/KUB light carrier-based fighters being built by the Russian aircraft construction company MiG under a contract with India are expected to be equipped with the improved Zhuk-ME radars, Yuriy Guskov, chief designer of the Fazotron-NIIR corporation, told Interfax-Military News Agency.
“The improved radar has better characteristics, for instance, a greater resolution of ground targets, which is up to 3 m.,” Guskov said.
According to him, the series-produced modernized Zhuk-ME radar locates ground targets with a resolution of 5×5 m.
Guskov said that if the Indian side placed a contract for modernizing manoeuvre unit MiG-29s in service with the Indian air force as expected, the aircraft would also be fitted with new Zhuk- ME radars with a resolution of 3×3 m.
The Zhuk-ME radar is mass produced and exported, to one Arab country among others, as part of avionics of the MiG-29SMT fighter. “More that 10 of these radars have been exported so far,” he said.
According to him, the design of the MiG-29M1/M2 aircraft is being defined for participation in the Indian tender for procuring 126 light fighters. The results of the tender are expected to be drawn up in late 2005.
[Passage omitted: Background on MiG’s contract to deliver MiG- 29K fighters to the Indian navy; MiG-29K specs]
Credit: Interfax-AVN military news agency web site, Moscow, in Russian 0941 12 Apr 05
ok some thing positive to contribute people to remove misconception.
now this 23,000lbs RD-33 is interesting much more than EF and F-18E.
NTV, Moscow, in Russian 0920 10 Apr 20/BBC Monitoring/(c) BBC
Text of report by Russian NTV on 10 April[Presenter] Ten years is a long time in military technology development. The MiG-29, the best jet fighter of the 1980s, remained unsurpassed for exactly that period of time. However, its rivals did not remain idle. The Russian fighter began lagging behind in terms of its avionics and weapons. To improve the situation, new modifications of the plane have been created.
In the early 1990s, the world’s leading aircraft corporations were working on a new multifunctional combat plane, which could be effectively used against air as well as ground targets.
The F-16 fighter, the main one produced in the USA, has also become multifunctional.
The [Russian] MiG corporation took up the challenge. The MiG-29 was very well designed, which created huge opportunities for its modernization.
The work was going in two directions. The first one envisaged a limited modernization, that is an upgrade of the weapons without changing the construction of the plane itself. The second was more radical and required changes in the airframe and the creation of a digital control and navigation system.
As a result, two modifications of the fighter appeared: the MiG- 29S with an upgraded radar and an increased flying range, and the MiG-29M. The first was brought into service by the [Russian] air force. The second never went to serial production and exists only as several prototypes.
In spring 1992, [then] President Boris Yeltsin was struck by its combat capabilities during demonstration flights at the Mochulishchi air base in Belarus and promised to give the green light to the promising aircraft model. In fact, nothing has been done.
The MiG-29M has been equipped with a remote control system and the Zhuk [Beetle] multifunctional radar, which allows targets to be tracked within a 100-km range. The radar can monitor 10 and control fire at four air targets simultaneously if self-guided air-to-air missiles are used.
The new weapons system was designed for salvo launching and beam- rider guidance of missiles.
At the same time work on a carrier version of the MiG-29 was in progress, but this promising project was stopped in the early 1990s due to a lack of funds.
Work on the carrier version of the MiG-29, the MiG-29K, resumed a few years later on a contract with a foreign partner.
This is the MiG-29K. The letter “K” stands for “korabelnyy” [ship- based]. It is unique in many aspects. It is equipped with a digital command and control system and can carry up to five additional fuel tanks. It has nine external stores for weapons. Its engines are the most powerful of all those used on MiG-29 modifications. At the moment of landing or take-off from the aircraft carrier each of them can develop thrust of 10.5 tonnes. The thrust of the basic MiG-29 slightly exceeds eight tonnes.
A big batch of those planes will be supplied to the Indian navy soon and attached to the Admiral Gorshkov aircraft carrier, which the Indians have bought from Russia.
After several years of stagnation, when the Russian air force apparently stopped the MiG-29 modernization programme, further development of the aircraft has started again.
In the late 1990s, the MiG corporation began working on a new modification, MiG-29SMT, to meet the standards of a 21st century fighter. Its combat capabilities will be close to those of the MiG- 29M.
An inexperienced person will not see any difference between the MiG-29SMT and the basic model. An aviation expert will notice a probe for mid-air refuelling and a broader range of weapons, first of all, air-to-surface missiles.
But the main things are hidden inside. They are the new radar and the new navigation and guidance system. The cabin has become more comfortable, which allows the pilot to use all the aircraft’s capabilities without a large effort.
[Vladimir Barkovskiy, captioned as deputy general designer of the MiG corporation] The aim of the ongoing modernization is to upgrade the avionics, the radar and the information and control means, as well as the weapons. Making visible changes is not our task. Such changes, if any, must be functional.
[Correspondent] Specialists from the MiG corporation are sure that the MiG-29SMT will become a real multifunctional fighter able to perform any tasks.
The two-seated MiG-29M2 is the latest modification of the MiG- 29. Equipped with an onboard radar, it has become a fully-fledged combat aircraft. Previously, two-seated MiGs had no radars and were used as dual training planes only.
Apart from conducting air combat, piloting a modern fighter implies dealing with a huge amount of information. This is why multifunctional fighters in many countries are more and more often designed as two-seater planes. The pilot steers the plane, while the operator runs the vectoring and control systems. The two-member crew can deliver strikes on ground targets, perform reconnaissance tasks and defend itself from enemy aircraft at the same time.
Professionals who have flown various types of planes highly appreciate the new MiG.
[Mikhail Belyayev, captioned as test pilot 1st rank of the MiG corporation] The MiG-29 is a soldier. I would compare it to a Kalashnikov assault rifle. You have to load it with ammunition, fuel it, and it will fly and fulfil any task.
The MiG-29 took off from the runway for the first time more than 25 years ago, but it still remains the best fighter of its class in the world.
Credit: NTV, Moscow, in Russian 0920 10 Apr 20
i cant believe that MIG-29 can hold 5.3 tons of internal fuel.
and u actually care to involve your self with him, actually all those who argue with him are well..what to say…..as good as he is. Get the point. Adding feul to flame is as lame as starting a flame war.
Surely i started this :rolleyes: . It was Flex297 and Bring it on. who started from price comparisions of F-16 vs MIG-29.
This is something you have just sucked out of your finger. It is your wishful thinking only, related to your antipathy to anything flying under Indian flag.
MiG-29K features wingfolds, strenghtened airframe and landing gear due to carrier landings, but this has been well compensated by use of lithium alloys (MiG-29M proposal). Now count in deleted auxilliary air vents plus their hydraulic retraction system and main intake ramps replaced by lightweight grids.
it is not wishfull thinking. u will lose big time this argument that MIG-29K has lesser weight than previous MIG-29s. infact it is heavier.
All data? That would mean you got plenty.. Then show us, now..
just read my link.
Are you guys actually trying to argue wth the forum oracle?
One wonders what those hi tech PAF jamming systems are exactly, the comedy of errors continues from the same crew.
surely one always wonders when didnot read well.
Islamabad, May 22 (UNI): Pakistan aeronautical experts have successfully upgraded avoinics and other sub-systems of Australian Mirage aircraft that Pakistan Air Force (PAF) had purchased in the late 1990s.
“Our experts at the PAC (Pakistan Aeronautical Complex) have successfully upgraded avionics, fire control, BVR (beyond visual range) and jamming system of more than 40 Australian Mirages the PAF has been flying since late 1990s,” an official source said here on Saturday.
He said the PAC has also rebuilt a number of Mirages out of over 30 such jets, the PAF had purchased from Libya last year.
The credit of giving a new lease of life to the discarded jets goes to our experts, he added.
Pakistan is the second country after France, which rebuilds Mirage aircraft at one of the specially-built facilities in the PAC. The complex has been rebuilding Mirages of not only the PAF, but also the same jets being flown by other friendly countries.
The PAF had procured 40 used Mirages after up-gradation of their avionics system by SAGEM of France under a $ 120 million deal in the late 1990s.
there have been dozen russian articles on it. Here is earliar thread on rd-33mk here.link
ok here is the link. the weights are much higher. even normal takeoff weight is
more than standard fulcrum.
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?p=643191&highlight=MIG-29K#post643191
let see its empty weight:8.5 tons MTOW:17 tons that doesnt exactly leave much room for fuel if it were to carry 8 tons of payload does it. As for f-18e its 30% bigger than Mig-29 hence the larger payload even then (8 ton payload is what was specified in the orginal specs i dont think super hornet hasnt been able to match that according to what i read).
u are wrong on numbers by wide margin.
PAF always looks for the best things out there.
Thanks for that laugh. I can always use a good laugh. Obviously the A-5 is the world’s best close air support aircraft because the PAF uses it. And the Mirage III upgraded to ROSE standard can make mincemeat of any Su-30 that dares challenge it?
And old F-16A’s with no BVR capability? They will dominate any Mirage 2000 or MiG-29 foolish enough to oppose them?
Then of course there is the mighty F-7PG with its radar that can see all of about 20 miles ahead. Of course it will still be able to handily defeat the Bison or the Mirage 2000 with little problem. 🙂
Where did write that PAF had best aircraft in the world. I wrote they are looking at the Best aircraft in the world. and surely any R-77 equipped aircraft can do kill against PAF jamming system. :rolleyes:
do you even know what you are talking about 9-41 is powered by 3rd series RD-33 while current 29K is powered by RD-33MK which generates 9 tons of thrust and has improved fuel efficency (there is plans for 10 ton variant). As for Empty weight care to point the source that told u its heavier than 29A epsecially considering mig-29k proposed hasnt flown yet.
As for its payload F-16 single engine design greatly favors large combat load (thanks to its wing design), payload is even greater than F-18 E which is newer than F-16 block 50 and comparable to the flanker but its rather dubious stat since with max payload F-16 wont be able to carry much internal fuel unlike either F-18 or Mig-29.
surely u have the link for 4th generation RD series :rolleyes:
9tons is the afterburning thrust of all new RD series. and i was asking about non-afterburning. only life is extended to 4000hrs.
and i have posted a article about MIG-29K taking shape. it is in IAF news and discussion probably in aprile. It is alot of heavier than what u think. it is no Rafale interms of weight.
F-18E is designed for 8000KG weopon load (unlike 5500KG of MIG-29) and has more internal fuel and hard points. simply no comparision there. Advance F-16 MTOW approaches twin engine fighters.
That is what others are trying to say. YOu cant compare simply based on numbers because other factors are not known.
surely no one can compare unless everything is known but crash rate still show some thing about airforce.
Are you saying that PAF officials lie about their force readiness to suit the requirements? Then what makes you believe that whatever PAF is saying now is credible when you clearly know that they lied in the past.
If what you are saying is true, then every statement emanating from PAF is suspect. And next time I tom tom the “… best BVR in south asia…” statement, I would be careful!
no i didnot say they lie. the just phrase things in such away that intended meaning is different at certain times. so why do u think they did the press conference first regarding JF-17 and than on F-16. they wanted to clarify certain issues. but u have to look deeper into it.
those are stats for 9-41 Mig-29k not the proposed Mig-29k for the IN (more powerful engine, lighter body, 4 opposed to 3 ETs etc).
Anyway still 2000 km range is similar to F-16 block 50 and ferry range are quite similar as well.
actually there is no indication at this point that they have managed to increase non-afterburning thrust of RD series engines. afterburning is increased surely but that is not a big factor for strike fighter range. also there is no evidence.that proposed MIG-29K is any lighter than even base line MIG-29A. on the contrary all data suggests that is alot heavier.
F-16block50 came some 15 years ago so hardly any achievment and with MIG-29 having even less payload than F-16 for twin engine fighter.