dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,776 through 2,790 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2390876
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Quite lacking in the stache department though.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2390968
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    bills funny isnt he, first he said it had AC…

    your words…

    in reply to: Rafale v Typhoon and the F22… #2391140
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    It is not likely and trust me, I am a huge F-35 fan and would love to tout BVR fighter tracking ability for the EODAS if it was possible. The main problem is zoom. Because the EODAS has to cover a 360 sphere, it cannot zoom (optically) because that would mean that it would loose track of other things in that area as it zooms in.

    That’s pretty much what I was trying to say.

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2391176
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    bills funny isnt he, first he said it had AC, now he said it didnt work and they are onto mk 2 AC
    and his sourse ?
    us dumb asses here on key, does he have any credability left ?
    yet all thats been said by dassault/thales is active stealth and stealthy jamming modes
    MBDA has said AC in regard to missile development

    He said Dassault Electronique seemed to be working on active cancelation. It turns out it might very well be the case for future upgrades.

    I’d like you to provide a link where sweetman said the Rafale has active cancelation. Failing that, admitting that you are wrong once again would do.

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Oh and since it’s warplanes and not fighters:

    http://server2.uploadit.org/files/nicolas10-TupolevTu22m3.jpg

    nic

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2392580
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    A direct satcom datalink is in the pipe for the 5th batch also. (source a former DSI issue)

    HMS would be good to have but keep in mind that this item could be relatively quickly integrated if needed by the AdA or another customer. In fact the rafale was already tested with an HMS from thales earlier in his development.

    In my personal opinion with the mica-ir an HMS is less critical for the rafale as if the “EM BVR” option fail (due to jamming for instance) you can imediatley switch to the “IR option” well before the merge (LOAL capibility now operational with the F3).

    With full around multi sensor fusion coverage it seems very unlikely that a threat could sneak to the merge undetected. To sum up, SA achieved through multi sensors fusion give you the time to anticipate and elaborate a tactic avoiding you the necessity to go autmaticly to the merge.

    HMD would also be very useful for CAS, as well as in the cases of a battlespace where you could meet low flying planes and helicopters.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale News IX #2392610
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Also, that new DDM NG thing looks amazing- apparently they’re going to add DIRCM at some point. Looking ahead to the Rafale of 2015-2018, we have:
    AESA
    DDM NG with DIRCM
    Active Stealth
    9t engine
    More SPECTRA modes
    METEOR
    OSF-IR
    Helmet Mounted Display (?)
    and who knows what else. I hope it will give the F-35 a nice bit of competition.

    I think the HMD is a must, laser satcom would be a huge asset too.

    Another feature I would like to see added would be some other variants of the Meteor, with at least an IIR variant.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale v Typhoon and the F22… #2392616
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    http://www.ausairpower.net/AIM-9X-FPA-seeker-300.png

    If that’s the image seeker you are talking about I would say you can’t draw any conclusion from it unless you know at what range the seeker is from the plane.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale v Typhoon and the F22… #2392743
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Maybe, however I would be very surprised if the range was superior to that of a modern missile seeker.

    Nic

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Mirage 2000 D/N

    http://www.uploadit.org/my.php?image=http://server2.uploadit.org/files/nicolas10-2000DEC2dash3n6.jpg

    in reply to: Rafale v Typhoon and the F22… #2392842
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I haven’t seen any figures listing likely ranges. I’d suspect that the range is considerably more than that of the IR seeker on an AAM though.

    I disagree with you. The FOV in those systems is much wider than that of a missile’s seeker, so its range should be impacted considerably. Even with the old Magic II, mirage pilots used the seeker to find tankers before they could make visual contact. So imagine what a 9X, or Mica could do.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale v Typhoon and the F22… #2392925
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    However, just as EODAS in only WVR, so is the MLD. There is still a need of a real IRST for long range detection and ID of targets.

    I agree here. The MLD may make the use of the 9X seeker for dogfight, but a tool to identify targets at long range would be a huge asset.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale v Typhoon and the F22… #2392937
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I know the LM website claims the algorithms required to update the MLD software to detect other FJ’s are only planned – as they have for years now – but from what both DJCROSS – an engineer on the F-22 and Showers have implied – the capability is already a reality.

    One of the reason’s the F-22 needs no IRST – as DJCROSS put it – is the fact it has 360 deg MLD coverage. This is supported by a bit of literature – where the F-22 MLD situational awareness is fused into the with the rest of the integrated sensors – I’d not bet against the the F-22 being able to detect aircraft at BVR ranges with 360 deg ranges thanks to the MLD’s currently installed.

    It also would lend support to the claim that Showers made about the F-22 not needing HMD to cue the 9X to exploit its full envelope.

    I had completely forgotten about the MLD. It’s especially silly since this article about the DDM-NG was just out. It would be awesome it it could be used to cue the AIM 9X indeed. I wonder if it’s already capable of discriminating between aircrafts and missiles or if it’s integrated with other sensors.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale v Typhoon and the F22… #2393303
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    EODAS would be better indeed. But failing that a 9X IR Imager would be better than nothing.

    in reply to: Rafale v Typhoon and the F22… #2393337
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    TV + link 16 can enable a fighter to home in on a F22 silently; besides, there is always a risk when using a radar, however much LPI it might be, especially when you want to go undetected.

    So having a missile that serves as an IRST would be a pretty good idea; especially if you find a way to minimise drag, RCS penalty and complexity.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,776 through 2,790 (of 4,147 total)