dark light

Nicolas10

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,836 through 2,850 (of 4,147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Nicolas10
    Participant

    Whatever the range of the OSF, it is going to be much bigger than the range of the radar against a stealth aircraft, especially considering the fact that the RBE2 PESA isn’t known for it’s long range in the first place.

    Nic

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    What I mean is a bit more subtle. If GCI/AWACS was involved in the exercise and could update F22 on Rafale positions and track, but could not update Rafales on Raptor positions because Raptor were too stealthy to be detected by said GCI/AWACS, then Rafale had to turn on their onboard radar to search for F22 while F22 could stay passive. Otherwise both would have stayed in passive mode with radar off and would not have found each other except by chance. Rafale pilots would know that F22 were be fed track by GCI/AWACS and thus that they were at a disadvantage, they had to try their own radar search. F22 pilots on the othet hand would not need to turn their radar on while still being updated on Rafales position by GCI/AWACS and onboard ESM.

    It’s just speculation but it could answer the question why did Rafale pilots turn their radar on knowing they could be targeted. Anyway, the A&C article is not accurate enough to determine exactly what happened.

    No, if the f22 receives updates, and if the Rafale emits, then they can triangulate between their bearing and the AWAC’s.

    If that was the case, the Rafales would keep their radar silent and use OSF to search for the raptors. And maybe try to detect the datalink between F22s and AWACs.

    Nic

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I think if the article is true, then kovy is right and the french wanted to use a soon to be obsolete radar to try and test the RCS of the F22, while at the same time the F22 wanted to test their EW suite against a PESA (which some russian planes use AFAIK).

    Contrary to what toocool says, I doubt this would prejudice the Rafale’s chances in the UAE, as everyone in the know would understand the in and outs of the exercise and that the Rafale didn’t use it’s best chances against the raptor.

    Oh and in the UAE I would guess that the OSF would work wonders. I doubt humidity/clouds would interfere all that much.

    Nic

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2392343
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    It is a position which does have some merit… but does it indicate that Brazil are contemplating actions which would prove unpopular in Washington? :confused:

    Not obeying Washington would prove unpopular in Washington.

    Nic

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2392373
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Robban,

    I disagree with you when you say that the Rafale drops the tail when turning.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qWRImSlVuE

    Some turns are high AOA, but in this video you can see many that aren’t and where the tail doesn’t drop at all.

    I agree with you the Gripen is very agile, but I am not sure the Gripen enjoys an instantaneous advantage over the Rafale; and thanks to a better T/W the Rafale enjoys an advantage in sustained manoeuvering.

    Comparing to this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACDGkNa77Rs&feature=related

    The gripen pilot doesn’t seem to make as aggressive a demo, and you can’t see many high AOA turns, but if you look closely you still see similar turns in the Rafale demo once in a while.

    Nic

    in reply to: Rafale M a possibility for RN if F-35 axed (Times article) #2008176
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Posturing.

    Selling an off the shelf carrier to the MN and buying the Rafale would make a lot of sense. Not only would the manufacture of a 3rd carrier make cost drop for the RN, it would keep thousands busy in the UK, while allowing the RN to save money on the Rafale instead of the JSF.

    Another benefit could be the integration of brimstone for french Rafales…

    Nic

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Well if they are training, why not?

    If one can imagine a scenario where F-22 may encounter 4.5 gen fighters that are using their radars, then it could perhaps make sense to train for it?

    Perhaps you should read the thread about DACT that somebody posted the other day…

    Any way you cut it such an engagement wouldn’t make sense, unless to train the F22 pilot how to fight a RBE2 PESA equipped plane with no OSF.

    I said it all along, it doesn’t make sense.

    Nic

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2396003
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    In both competiton there is no other fighter that can offer such a package of different advantages at once, but of course this will have its price!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S25rlIyx214

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I actually rather like the MAW system, that little extra all aspect radar could be a godsend if integrated right.

    But it would be detected by adverse EWS from way further than it could detect incoming threats, while an IR/TV solution would keep your quitness.

    Nic

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Typhoon currently has MAW (active mm radar), and a passive upgrade is proposed (PIMAW), which can apparently give true targeting info on incoming threats.

    And anyway, until tranche 3a content is clarified we don’t know what we’ll be getting

    I think the active maws is a dead end, while passive systems as EODAS is the way of the future.

    Nic

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    I’m afraid you may only be seeing one side of it, thanks to some (understandable) national bias. However you do seem to be coming over a little too aggressively on the issue.

    I’m not greek nor do I have any links to greece. If some aircrafts constantly violated my country’s airspace I would hope that after a few warnings to said country, mine would then decide to shoot down the intruders.

    Heck China went at US planes in international airspace and got away with it.

    From an international perspective, neither side is really in the right, and if the Greeks start shooting down Turkish planes for what is an incredibly minor provocation, they’d be in the wrong.

    Minor provocation may sometimes turn to medium provocation, and even major provocation at some point if you let them unpunished.

    Imagine if NATO had started shooting down Soviet aircraft when they approached and entered our airspace or vice versa.

    It’s not like it has never happened. How many missiles were fired at SR71 or U2s?

    I’m no expert on Greek internal politics but are you really saying that Greeks don’t have internal political problems? Apart from the fact that every nation does, Greece seems to be having some problems at the moment (large riots last year etc) that a bit of common national pride towards an outside aggressor might help to solve.

    I never said they don’t have internal problems, but I don’t think escalating things with turkey would be the best way to handle them. Different kinds of gvt and problems

    Now could we please get back to topic as I and a few other have already tried? If you want to discuss this more PM me or make a thread elsewhere.

    I will from now on, but then don’t bait me into replying your posts.

    Nic

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Why, Tranche 3 hardware hasn’t even been finalised, the AESA Radar is still on the drawing board and will be as good as they can build it, PIRATE is a damn good system, HMD, etc, etc, etc.

    What exactly is is missing?

    Something like EODAS but benefiting from the newest breakthrough for long range detection with the algorithm to actually make it useful (range, identify threats), AESA EWS (I don’t think DASS has it), satcom. Long range IIR missiles.

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Step outside the conflict and look in, both sides are doing exactly the same thing, posturing for the benefit of their own people. It won’t end well, look at Argentina in 1982. They tried to divert the populations attention from internal politics, it didn’t end well, it won’t here either.

    That’s exaclty what the turks are doing in my opinion, and this is why I think that a greek gvt should stop playing their game, and instead shoot any intruder to put a stop to the intrusions. I seriously doubt the greek are playing the same game if you look a few seconds at their internal politics.

    Nic

    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Show gonads;

    Step 1:

    Issue a statement that every turkish fighter entering greek airspace is now going to be shot down after due warning. Radio, sign, then a warning burst, then shoot down.

    Stop 2:

    Do it.

    Turkey isn’t going to attack greece. Their posturing is just that: posturing, to serve to the internal population.

    They do it because they try to justify many of their internal policies, but they wouldn’t be able to attack Greece in any serious way.

    IMO greece doesn’t have to put up with that BS.

    Nic

    in reply to: Guess the NATO reporting name for PAK-FA ? #2399202
    Nicolas10
    Participant

    Or Su 50 Flamewar

Viewing 15 posts - 2,836 through 2,850 (of 4,147 total)