dark light

aerospacetech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 1,127 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: STOVL Aircrafts #2618017
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Heres a Soviet VTOL project you probably never saw before…

    KOR-70.

    By two ex Bartini designers, Berlin and Korchagin, KOR-70 was for ASW and other tasks. Its configuration shows VVA-14 influence. It had VTOL capability but could also be launched as a seaplane. The idea was that 80% of the time it could be winched down to sea level and takeoff conventionally as a seaplane, saving lots of fuel, while when the sea was too rough it could take off vertically from the deck, with a range penalty.

    The power plant of KOR-70 consisted of two AI-25 lift/cruise engines with rotating nozzles and thrust of 1500 kg.

    The lift engines (RD-36-35F) with thrust of 2900 kg were arranged in pairs in front and tail ends of the fuselage. Air ducts were located above the fuselage.

    Max takeoff weight was to be 11900kg, with 1200kg combat payload.

    Alternatively with a cabin fitted it could carry 1000kg cargo or 10-12 marines.

    It never left the drawing board, however.

    Also:

    Tupolev designed a rival to the Yak-36 project (“136”) with Pegasus style 4 poster engine but I have no pics to share.

    in reply to: Which one is SA-5 #2050839
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    5V21: S-200 Angara (Initial version)
    5V28: S-200M Vega-M

    in reply to: AGM-122 Sidearm #2050844
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    It was a low cost rebuild of the Navy’s stock of old semi-active AIM-9C missiles, delivered to the US Marine Corps.

    http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-122.html

    in reply to: The second HUD of Su-27UB and 30 ? #2618443
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    airtoair is correct.

    There is no HUD for the rear seat, just a glass panel to rest notes or maps on.

    The Su-30MKI rear seat has 4 MFDs including one mounted high in the centre as a kind of head level display. There is no real need for a HUD as the WSO doesn’t fly the machine.

    in reply to: PAK FA news #2635271
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    I believe Soyuz are working on an engine for PAK-FA based on the Yak-141’s R-79M called R145M-300, developing 16,000kg thrust. They’d also need either a liftjet or a fan system at the front to balance it.

    in reply to: PAK FA news #2635619
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    http://paralay.narod.ru/pakfamig.html

    This guy has some interesting images, but this page calls his research into question- I drew this, and posted it as a “what-if”. It is in no way a real image!

    in reply to: PAK FA news #2636373
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Mikoyan offered a medium size project powered by two RD-33 derivatives, but that wasn’t acceptable.

    The size issue is dominated by the existence of only 2 possible engines; RD-33 upgrades and AL-31F upgrades (I know that Soyuz are pushing R-79M derivatives, but they aren’t based on production items). Given that the Russians demanded two engines, you can only choose either a MiG-29 sized or an Su-27 sized aircraft. I think that Mikoyan’s proposal made more sense, but politically and economically stronger, Sukhoi’s proposal was bound to win.

    Oh, and for about the 1 millionth time, thats not the “MiG LFI” its the ‘Mukhamedov’ OKB “Integral” project which led to the Russian/Iranian “Shafagh”. Russia has apparently pulled out, leaving Iran developing it alone.

    in reply to: FLANKER users #2637205
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    KNAAPO were the original Su-27 builders. Su-27UB serial production was moved to IAPO because of the volume of work at KNAAPO. KNAAPO built the Su-30MKK twin seat model primarily because of potential conflicts of interest at IAPO who were building the MKI for India. KNAAPO are now marketing several twin seat models (Su-33UB, Su-35UB).

    IAPO built the Su-27UB and went on to market armed derivatives of it(Su-30MK etc). They make the Su-30MKI.

    NAPO – Su-27IB/34. Production was supposed to go to IAPO but they were busy so NAPO got it instead.

    in reply to: IAF Thread : Dec 2004+ #2639674
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Nice Su-30MKI pic

    in reply to: This month's issue of Super Fighter magazine #2640324
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    I saw this magazine in the newsagents and couldn’t believe it was an AFM publication. A compilation of no-brainer articles that revealed nothing interesting about any of the machines involved for anyone who has ever read a book or website, plus a ranking system out of Topps Trumps…. please. Its kiddie stuff.

    in reply to: MiG-23MLD in Afghanistan HUD shots #2644638
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    MiG-29 HUD (ILS) and HDD (IPV) modes

    in reply to: MiG-23MLD in Afghanistan HUD shots #2671433
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    I know several people who have them, but not in electronic form.

    in reply to: Single-Crystal Engine Blade Technology #2671550
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    The AL-31F was designed with single-crystal turbines in 1973, but it wasn’t achievable at that time and directionally solidified ones substituted. I expect at some time later single crystal blades were substituted.

    in reply to: MiG-23MLD in Afghanistan HUD shots #2671556
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    I have a MiG-21PF manual in Russian. No MF or Bis though.

    in reply to: Single-Crystal Engine Blade Technology #2672582
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    AL-31F was designed to use single crystal turbines, but problems with manufacturing meant it was changed over to directionally solidified technology with improved cooling.

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 1,127 total)