dark light

aerospacetech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,127 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • aerospacetech
    Participant

    The R-27R can’t be launched outside of STT mode by design. The N019 radar can only compute firing solutions in single target track mode. More importantly the R-27’s autopilot is somewhat inaccurate, so it is important that it goes to semi-active homing ASAP. The inertial stage is there to extend the range of R-27 to match or outrange the AIM-7F/M, despite the inferior lockon range of its SARH seeker. You should not confuse it with the much more advanced system for AIM-120/R-77 etc.

    in reply to: "Lampyridae" German stealth #2681151
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Any idea what armament was planned?

    in reply to: Su-25TM, Vikhr, a tank, a Tu-16 and some explosions #2681862
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    The explosion size is misleading. The Tu-16 was largely intact after the impact- it falls down mainly in one piece. Both aircraft and tank might have been full of fuel, too, which burns nicely 😉

    I’m guessing that the number in the top right corner is altitude, bottom right seems to be time to impact in seconds, not sure about the others.

    in reply to: "Loctictwo Wojskowe Rosji" by Pyotr Butowski #2682690
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Hopefully PiBu won’t mind if I post this- its a drawing of MFI from 1996, well before the public unveiling, but I think you’ll agree its a lot closer than other ones. I suspect he saw a picture of it much earlier, as John Lake did 😉

    in reply to: "Loctictwo Wojskowe Rosji" by Pyotr Butowski #2682724
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Hmm PiBu from the forum (Piotr Butowski) might object 😉

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2682873
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    That drawing is quite incorrect- the wings are not cranked deltas, for a start.

    in reply to: Yak-41 – For Deino #2682881
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Well looking on the net 136 seems to be a Dynasoar style project- maybe I remembered the number wrongly?

    It looked like a rival design to the Yak-36/38.

    in reply to: Yak-41 – For Deino #2682996
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    I was “reading” though a very interesting Russian-language book at the Midland Counties book sale on Saturday, it was all about Tupolev aircraft and I noticed a pic that looked exactly like your mystery aircraft and was labelled project “136”.

    It had quite a few what ifs in it like the Tu-138 and Tu-148 fighters, but it was £30 and I had already spent £57 so I had to give it a miss.

    in reply to: Yak-41 – For Deino #2683217
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    I saw a Tupolev VTOL project “136” that looked remarkably like those models…

    in reply to: "Loctictwo Wojskowe Rosji" by Pyotr Butowski #2683294
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    No, it doesn’t do Polish.

    I did find one here:

    http://www.poltran.com/

    To answer my own question 😉

    in reply to: N011M Bars info #2683303
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    P.S. Crobato the radar you refer to did exist. It predates the “non-equidistant” cheaper array design seen in Zhuk-MSF/Sokol.

    It was referred to as “RP-35”- here’s a pic

    in reply to: N011M Bars info #2683306
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    With the Zaslon NIIP managed to get reasonable performance out to +-60 deg. The newer type antenna used on Bars is better in a lot of ways, but NIIP have struggled to achieve their initially predicted +-60 deg from early Bars documentation. The production Bars is consequently limited to +-40 deg in electronic scanning.

    Note that the radar is derived from the N011, a planar antenna radar which was heavier than the N001. Replacing the lightweight antenna with a 110kg phased array probably only made matters worse.

    in reply to: Fastest fighter #2684064
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    The only cost is loss of foreign earnings that the sale of that Ti on the open market would have earned them. Of course after capitalism set in then the Ti was needed elsewhere and was no longer “free”.

    Ermmm.. and the extra time effort and tools required to weld/forge the titanium as well of course.

    in reply to: N011M Bars info #2684216
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    As for performance, you have to distinguish AA performance from AS performance. Russian fighter radar makers are only in their first generation of multirole AA/AS radars, and are really only at APG-65 level at best. The Bars (and Zhuk in its original form) is restricted by lack of signal processing power to around 10m in SAR mapping resolution. CAPTOR can manage 1m already and 0.3m shortly.

    NIIP acknowledge this is a drawback of the Bars, and all their newer radars will use COTS technology in the Baget-55 series of signal processors. Perhaps India will upgrade the Bars signal processor to a more powerful one at a later date…

    in reply to: N011M Bars info #2684220
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    NIIP are promoting a cut-down radar called “Bars-29” for the MiG-29K. Presumably it has a smaller antenna, and weighs somewhat less.

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,127 total)