Why would it not be able to carry R-73 on the inner wing pylons?
Doesn’t make any sense…
Also maybe the FSW Su-9 project refers to the original Su-9, the Me-262ski- this is the right timeframe, as FSW was tested by Tsybin and others around then.
Well- one possibility is an S-32 mockup being shown at Saki to visiting naval/political bigwigs alongside the carrier preparation work. The “-A” does indicate the first time anything interesting was spotted at this particular airfield.
Nope.
Personally I have my doubts.
Originally posted by matt
😮 Oh my that is advanced..Something from the Times of India, its kind of sad but well it points out something as most political cartoons do, and one thing i learnt in history was to apreciate a political cartoonists.
[begin rant]
There is very poor grammar being used in that cartoon. Shame on you, Times of India 😉
“It’s” is ONLY used as a contraction of “It is”, never to indicate possession.
The correct form is always “Its”.
The apostrophe for genitive case (possession) is a relic of the days when English had different endings for different cases. The genitive ending was often “-es”
So “God” became “Godes” or “Goddes” in the genitive, with the “e” pronounced. (God – Es)
Then the final e became silent, and eventually it became the custom to leave it out and put an apostrophe in its place.
So now we say “God’s”…
But as “Its” was never shortened from “Ites”, why would it gain an apostrophe?
“Him” becomes “His” in genitive, you don’t write “Hi’s”…..
[end rant]
Well- a lot of them were taken on just a few different occasions, even if they were released slowly over time.
Indeed. I’m surprised you didn’t know that one failed missile launch automatically infects every other missile from the same country with an attitude of miserable failure.
During the Vietnam war an AIM-7 failed to start and subsequently the US had to destroy every missile they had ever made and build new ones.
Oh, and the total failure of the Rockwell XFV-12 to work properly prevented every US fighter from taking off….
F-35 “Microsoft”
You might not like it, it probably crashes but its gonna be the defacto standard whether you like it or not….
SAR radar uses the movement of the radar to accumulate successive radar returns into one, giving the effect of a much larger antenna along the direction of travel.
Inverse SAR uses the motion of the target rather than the motion of the host aircraft, for the same purposes.
Well its American, and it is going to be exported round the world…
F-35 ‘Hamburger’?
Looks and smells nice, sounds cheap, tastes bland and tends to put on weight?
Well, MiG-33 was the next designation available.
http://www.airwar.ru/enc/spy/yak44.html says it was 2x D-27.
It also says 2 X 4700 hp, which seems rather lower than the D-27, so perhaps the D-227 is correct.
Yep, same engine!
by stealthy I was referring to the non-existent picture 🙂