dark light

aerospacetech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 1,127 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Su-30MK2 #2663991
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Why would it not be able to carry R-73 on the inner wing pylons?

    Doesn’t make any sense…

    in reply to: Sukhoi Syb-A … FSW demonstrator !?! #2664157
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Also maybe the FSW Su-9 project refers to the original Su-9, the Me-262ski- this is the right timeframe, as FSW was tested by Tsybin and others around then.

    in reply to: Sukhoi Syb-A … FSW demonstrator !?! #2664162
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Well- one possibility is an S-32 mockup being shown at Saki to visiting naval/political bigwigs alongside the carrier preparation work. The “-A” does indicate the first time anything interesting was spotted at this particular airfield.

    in reply to: Sukhoi Syb-A … FSW demonstrator !?! #2664182
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Nope.

    Personally I have my doubts.

    in reply to: Interesting LCA Pic #2664202
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Originally posted by matt
    😮 Oh my that is advanced..

    Something from the Times of India, its kind of sad but well it points out something as most political cartoons do, and one thing i learnt in history was to apreciate a political cartoonists.

    [begin rant]
    There is very poor grammar being used in that cartoon. Shame on you, Times of India 😉

    “It’s” is ONLY used as a contraction of “It is”, never to indicate possession.

    The correct form is always “Its”.

    The apostrophe for genitive case (possession) is a relic of the days when English had different endings for different cases. The genitive ending was often “-es”

    So “God” became “Godes” or “Goddes” in the genitive, with the “e” pronounced. (God – Es)

    Then the final e became silent, and eventually it became the custom to leave it out and put an apostrophe in its place.

    So now we say “God’s”…

    But as “Its” was never shortened from “Ites”, why would it gain an apostrophe?

    “Him” becomes “His” in genitive, you don’t write “Hi’s”…..

    [end rant]

    in reply to: Question about J-10 pics #2664472
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Well- a lot of them were taken on just a few different occasions, even if they were released slowly over time.

    in reply to: Blinder, Backfire, & Blackjack Hunter??? #2666640
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Indeed. I’m surprised you didn’t know that one failed missile launch automatically infects every other missile from the same country with an attitude of miserable failure.

    During the Vietnam war an AIM-7 failed to start and subsequently the US had to destroy every missile they had ever made and build new ones.

    Oh, and the total failure of the Rockwell XFV-12 to work properly prevented every US fighter from taking off….

    in reply to: Mig29M2 #2667615
    aerospacetech
    Participant
    in reply to: What should the F-35 be named? #2668715
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    F-35 “Microsoft”

    You might not like it, it probably crashes but its gonna be the defacto standard whether you like it or not….

    in reply to: Whats does an Inverse -SAR? #2669434
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    SAR radar uses the movement of the radar to accumulate successive radar returns into one, giving the effect of a much larger antenna along the direction of travel.

    Inverse SAR uses the motion of the target rather than the motion of the host aircraft, for the same purposes.

    in reply to: What should the F-35 be named? #2670090
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Well its American, and it is going to be exported round the world…

    F-35 ‘Hamburger’?

    Looks and smells nice, sounds cheap, tastes bland and tends to put on weight?

    in reply to: Current status of Mikoyan's MFI 1.44 demonstrator ??? #2671450
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Well, MiG-33 was the next designation available.

    in reply to: Coaler versions #2672847
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    http://www.airwar.ru/enc/spy/yak44.html says it was 2x D-27.

    It also says 2 X 4700 hp, which seems rather lower than the D-27, so perhaps the D-227 is correct.

    in reply to: Coaler versions #2673019
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Yep, same engine!

    in reply to: How much would this cost? #2673155
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    by stealthy I was referring to the non-existent picture 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 1,127 total)