dark light

aerospacetech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,127 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2695146
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Imagine you are in a battle, and you see an Su-24MR fly overhead.

    “Fencer-E” is a hell of a lot quicker and less prone to misunderstanding than saying its actual designation.

    in reply to: Upgraded Sukhois enter service with RuAF #2695185
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    The big advantage NIIP has over Phazotron is that the Zhuk family is a whole new radar, needing expensive new production facilities to produce commercially, while the progressive evolution of the N001 builds on existing components which have been in production a long time and are still being made. It is possible to gradually work towards a new radar in stages.

    Phazotron it seems are forced to assemble their ‘production’ Zhuk radars in house, in facilities normally used to make only test radar sets.

    in reply to: Laser sensor systems, LWRs etc. #2695195
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    The Su-25TM, Ka-50 and Mi-24 were all supposed to have the L140 Otklik laser warning reciever.

    in reply to: Russian UCAVs #2648111
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Russia has UAVs, just not UCAVs. Different things 😉

    in reply to: Reference Material #2649837
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    SOC you forgot http://www.jedonline.com/

    in reply to: Reference Material #2649852
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Well, I had a shedload of stuff but I threw it all away in 1993 when I left my Aero Eng course to study English. I was in denial…

    Of course, I regret it now… having to start again 😉

    in reply to: Mica vs AMRAAM #2650233
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    The brochure range figures for R-77 are 50km (fighter)/80km (bomber).

    in reply to: Russian UCAVs #2650391
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Yakovlev are working on a UCAV based around Yak-130 technology.

    Tupolev claim to be working in this area:

    http://www.tupolev.ru/English/Show.asp?SectionID=66

    Lavotchkin (OKB-301) closed down in 1960 after Lavotchkin’s death, both it and Myashishchev’s OKB-23 being incorporated into Chelomei’s OKB-52. It reopened 5 years later as a producer of unmanned space probes.

    in reply to: So this isn't the Yak-43 afterall? #2650424
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    I think the “Yak-43” may have been powered by a V/STOL derivative of the NK-321 turbofan.

    Given this engine’s service record, its probably a good thing this project never went anywhere.

    in reply to: So this isn't the Yak-43 afterall? #2650427
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    The Yak canard delta pic is from Yefim Gordon, and is definitely their MFI project.

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2650434
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    RP-35 is Zhuk-M with a phased array antenna. No more, no less..

    in reply to: Middle Eastern Nukes #2653721
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    I only agree with their right to exist inside their original borders. Is there something wrong with that?

    Well, there is the little problem that prior to the creation of Israel the whole area was Palestine. Any two part state solution concedes the right of one people to forcibly dispossess another of its land. Also which borders do you pick- 1948, 1967, etc?

    The only fair solution is, as Arthur indicates, a single secular state with Arabs, Jews, and others given full voting rights and citizenship, with no “state” religion.

    Unfortunately neither side seem interested in the fair solution…

    in reply to: Super Hornet #2654824
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    F414-400 for the Super Hornet
    Thrust: 100kN (A/B)
    Configuration: 3/7/1/1
    Length: 3.912m
    Max Diameter: 0.889m
    Weight:
    Bypass ratio: 0.29
    Pressure ratio: 30

    M88-2
    Thrust: 50 kN (dry) 75 kN (A/B)
    Configuration: 3/6/1/1
    Length: 3.538 m
    Inlet diameter: 0.696 m
    Weight: 897 kg
    Bypass ratio: 0.3
    Pressure ratio: 24.5
    Mass flow rate: 65 kg/s
    TET: 1 850K
    SFC: 0.8 (dry) 1.7 (A/B)

    M88-3
    Thrust: 60 kN (dry) 90 kN (A/B)
    Configuration: 3/6/1/1
    Length: 3.618 m
    Inlet diameter: 0.790 m
    Weight: 985 kg
    Bypass ratio: 0.3
    Pressure ratio: 27
    Mass flow rate: 65 kg/s
    TET: 1 850K
    SFC: 0.8 (dry) 1.7 (A/B)

    in reply to: MiG-29SMT flight tests with 'Zhuk-MEh' #2654842
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    R-77 is only in LOW RATE PRODUCTION. It never entered production in one of the big old Soviet factories and probably never will.

    This means you can’t order 5000 of the buggers unless you want to hand the Russians a big wad of cash to tool up a large factory to make the things. Thats why both India and China have ordered small quantities as stopgaps pending their own BVR missile programs.

    The R-27 series was built in large numbers, and hence is easily available. Also the tooling etc is probably still around somewhere so you could build more.

    in reply to: COuld someone give me info about the Igla 9k 310 , please? #2655333
    aerospacetech
    Participant

    Not quite 🙂

    Igla-1 (9K310 system, 9M313 missile) is the stopgap Igla design, put into service when the seeker for the true Igla (9K38 system, 9M39 missile) was taking too long to develop. It is largely similar to Igla but has an improved version of the Strela-3 (9K36 system / 9M36 missile, SA-14 Gremlin) seeker. This seeker is more susceptible to flares and has less good all aspect detection compared to the true Igla.

    There is a lot of confusion about which is SA-16 and which is SA-18 out of Igla-1 and Igla. I think SA-16 is Igla-1 and SA-18 is Igla.

Viewing 15 posts - 976 through 990 (of 1,127 total)