dark light

Archer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,614 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Texas Flying Legends Reno 2017 #775544
    Archer
    Participant

    “Daddy, when I grow up I want to become a pilot!”

    “You’ll have to make a choice son, you can’t do both…”

    🙂

    in reply to: Free Stuff #778367
    Archer
    Participant

    Before you chuck stuff in the recycle bin, have you considered giving Coen at the Flash Aviation shop in Eindhoven a call? Alternatively, the Aviation Megastore at Aalsmeerderbrug might also consider taking some stuff off your hands.

    in reply to: Aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous….. !? #778473
    Archer
    Participant

    Dave English’ site has this one listed as ‘Original author unknown, dates back to a World War II advisory.‘ so I guess we can treat it as a historic quote 😉

    in reply to: Just imagine with today's income… #779413
    Archer
    Participant

    From ‘Flight International’, the 26 March 1965 edition. I also posted this image, if only we could go back and do some shopping…

    http://www.vc10.net/div/aircraftAds_may1964_resize.jpg

    in reply to: Mexican Albatross help required #779852
    Archer
    Participant

    Copied the contents for your convenience:

    Hello folk, can someone supply me with some information.
    Anyone been to the Mexican Naval base at Veracruz, Mexico, recently, or going in not to distant future, who could investigate the identity of the Grumman Albatross gate guardian on the entrance road on the base. It has s/n MP-102, and has Wright Cyclone R1820-76A-94’s, (no intake on top of engine) but it cant be the same A/C that was sold to Mexico by the RCAF (with same MP-102), as it had Wright Cyclone R1820-82’s with distinctive air intake on the top of the cowling. Access to cockpit would be needed to view makers plate, which is on the instrument bulkhead in front on the right seat, t the co-pilot’s left knee.

    Any help would be appreciated or someone on the base I can contact.

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #780854
    Archer
    Participant

    Post # 12 (above) shows a drawing without the letters “K L M” at the nose end of the fuselage.

    Which is correct?

    The drawing in post #12 is from a 1960s publication, without knowing the specifics I would rather trust a photo than an old drawing.

    Then again, when the Aviodrome museum at Lelystad painted one of their DC-3s in the orange colourscheme, they dit not paint these large “K L M’ letters underneath the fuselage. Perhaps they knew something we don’t.

    I also found this photo: https://www.flickr.com/photos/8270787@N07/16476630568

    Archer
    Participant

    The naming scheme you use is best matched to your requirements with regard to sorting and storing these images. Which parameters are important for you to be able to find photos easily? I use a mix of registrations, name of copyright holder or date to store images in a structured way but that is what works for me (so far). If you are looking at large numbers of images and you want to keep things structured, work out something on a piece of paper first. And remember that your computer will sort everything primarily based on the first part of the file name. So use the most important parameter that you search for first.

    Just my two cents.

    in reply to: JPG, PNG, or TIFF? Scanned photos image format. #442892
    Archer
    Participant

    Same for me, scan as TIFF and then export as JPG when I want to use them anywhere. Both PNG and GIF use a limited colour palette and as you mentioned, are ideally suited to digital drawings. For archiving purposes I would not use these formats, just TIFF.

    in reply to: Tying up a drawing number to aircraft type. #785927
    Archer
    Participant

    It might be worth contacting the Brooklands Museum, someone in the archives there might be able to connect that number to something else in their collection. Or perhaps the date will enable them to figure out what project was being worked on. Just a thought.

    in reply to: Hangar 11 Hurribomber sold #788373
    Archer
    Participant

    https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4601/39226358471_82c1ede2be_c.jpg
    BE505_WhiteWaltham_300612 by Jelle Hieminga, on Flickr
    No more visits to White Waltham for lunch then, but it’s been great! I for one have enjoyed the sight of this Hurribomber!

    in reply to: Definitive Concorde DVD recommendation #788849
    Archer
    Participant

    The ConcordeSST website has some recommended ones: http://www.concordesst.com/books.html I cannot comment on which one’s the best one myself I’m afraid.

    in reply to: Yak 55 double vision! #792829
    Archer
    Participant

    If the owner can sell it as an airshow act, then it has value for him. Had they done this to two historically significant aircraft, I’m sure it would have caused quite a stir. As for two Yak-55s, I don’t think it matters much what he does with them. I for one will be looking out for the videos showing the finished item.

    in reply to: Yak 55 double vision! #792923
    Archer
    Participant

    You could even argue that this is a similar project :p
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]257628[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: How many "real" Furys and Sea Furys are there still flying? #793334
    Archer
    Participant

    Another small addition: According to the Flying Legends site (and my memory) the Fury now registered as G-CBEL is not the same airframe as the one I had in my list as VH-SHF.

    • G-CBEL is c/n 37539, originally a Fury ISS, restored to fly in 1991 as N36SF. Flew in the UK since 2009 as G-CBEL before moving to Australia as VH-SFW. Then came back and became G-CBEL again, taking on the ‘SR661’ prototype colours.
    • VH-SHF is c/n 37723, another Fury ISS that was originally N43SF but moved to NZ for a post-restoration flight as ZK-SFR in 1987. She gained a wing-fold mechanism courtesy of WG655, making this a hybrid ISS/Sea Fury I guess. This airframe then moved to Australia as VH-SHF and WarbirdRegistry lost track of her after 2005. A post on this forum from 2010 mentioned that the aircraft from this syndicate were held by the government in lieu of back taxes (see here: https://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?102772-Sea-Fury-VH-SHF-still-around).
    in reply to: How many "real" Furys and Sea Furys are there still flying? #793563
    Archer
    Participant

    Thank you John for updating the list. I knew that the WarbirdRegistry is outdated in some areas but I figured it would give us a starting point.

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 1,614 total)