dark light

Archer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,111 through 1,125 (of 1,614 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Plane Sailing Catalina #1408634
    Archer
    Participant

    Tom, that only relates how the earlier Cats had a differently shaped rudder than the PBY-4 and later series. It mentions the PBY-6 having a taller fin, but this was a slightly different shape than the Plane Sailing Cat (see image below). The Plane Sailing Cat (the original one) had been modified with R-2600 engines instead of the normal R-1830s and the larger, rectangular rudder was a part of this modification.

    Original rudder shape (PBY-1 shown here):
    http://www.pby.com/Photos/PBY-1/USN_1_01.jpg

    Normal PBY-4/5 rudder shape:
    http://www.oldprops.f9.co.uk/props1/Catalina%20C-FNJF3.jpg

    PBY-6:
    http://www.liberatorcrew.com/15_Gunnery/FlyingBoats/Catalina-PBY-6A.jpg

    VH-BPS:
    http://website.lineone.net/~roling47/SeaWings/Cat1a.JPG

    in reply to: RAF VC-10`s how long to retirement? #1430736
    Archer
    Participant

    The planned out of service date for the VC10 is now 2011, but there are some rumblings which might lead to earlier retirement for some airframes. Mostly gossip for now but who knows!

    Aircraft types with Conways…… I can think of the 707 and the Victor off the top of my head.

    in reply to: Your name is BlueRobin and I claim my 57p! #429081
    Archer
    Participant

    Congratulations on the first solo Melv! Now is that cabin actually big enough to contain that grin??

    in reply to: Aviation Related Ground Vehicles #1341978
    Archer
    Participant

    very kind of Unigate to donate two milk floats but – why?

    Because, apart from its value as a historic vehicle, it is also heavily used, and trust me: the older one of the two is not in very good shape anymore! Hence the new one! :rolleyes:

    I think it should be included here as it does have an aviation connection, I once moved a Hawker Hunter with it for example :p In the photo below it is serving as a water bowser/pumping vehicle 😉
    http://www.vc10.net/Misc/Images/CleaningVC10tail.jpg

    in reply to: Brooklands 15th April, 2005. #1354426
    Archer
    Participant

    Quick query for my fellow travellers – I will be coming round the M25 anti-clockwise – the AA website recommends leaving the M25 at Jct 11 and heading to Brooklands via the A318. Do you agree, or am I better on continuing to Jct 10 (the A3 jct) and making my way to Brooklands that way?

    Don’t know if anyone has replied yet, but the website provides this small map:
    http://www.brooklandsmuseum.com/images/mainmap_large.gif
    I’ve never used jct 10 to get to Brooklands, but it does look like a shorter distance from the junction to the museum. So if the M25 isn’t doing its usual carpark impression….

    Personally I would take jct 11 and the A317, but that’s just because I know that route.

    in reply to: Help photos needed #1359004
    Archer
    Participant

    …if taken after 31 Dec 1954…

    Shouldn’t that be ‘before’? :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Racing Seafury of the 1970's #1359772
    Archer
    Participant

    Extending the history forward a bit, I’ve always wanted to do a caption competition with this photo, but as aircraft and owner are no longer with us never did.

    (I’ll remove the photo if this offends anyone!)

    in reply to: Stupid question time…. #430368
    Archer
    Participant

    Height is usually to the highest point when parked, but the conditions should always be specified!
    A proper diagram should look something like this:

    http://www.airtractor.com/drawings/dimensions.jpg

    If not specified I would assume that the gear is shown in the position ‘on ground’ for nominal oleo-extension. If a taildragger is drawn in ‘flying attitude’ then the oleos will probably be drawn fully extended.

    So… depends on the drawing and the purpose thereof I would say! Figures in a book can therefore be confusing since the diagram that should accompany the figures is usually missing.

    in reply to: B25 Mitchell question #1376335
    Archer
    Participant

    Good question. While that is the most prominent difference, they also added a firing position in the tail, added waist guns in the back and lost the bottom (retractable) turret. Keeping the turret in the rear fuselage would have concentrated the firing power on that end of the aircraft, so my guess is that it was part of a major redistribution of firing power around the airframe. Another reason could have been weight and balance. With the tail position you had added weight in the rear end, necessitating moving some weight forward to compensate.

    in reply to: Wings and Wheels Show: preview #1376887
    Archer
    Participant

    Something greenish and twin-tailed perhaps?? 😉

    in reply to: Brooklands Clique? #1394673
    Archer
    Participant

    Brooklands is a bit messy these days, with Mercedes building alongside and a complete Concorde spread around the place, but is still a great place! Won’t be able to join you guys but enjoy!

    And well done to Kev!

    in reply to: Yak-11 in Kansas City (2005 Zombie thread) #1398716
    Archer
    Participant

    Nice photos Steve! Looks like a great restoration!

    There’s something un-Russian about that third shot though! 😉 😀

    in reply to: I'll take the Mustang in the back of this photo! #1400038
    Archer
    Participant

    To make up for it, I’ve found a different pic!

    This had better be it!!

    That is indeed the unfortunate CAF example, you can see the difference in appearance between Kermit’s polished aluminium and the CAF’s ‘silver paint’ finish.

    To get back to the start of this thread: Kermit’s Fantasy of Flight hosts an event called Mustangs and Mustangs where he assembles examples of both the cars and the aircraft. I’m guessing that is where the photos were taken! It makes sense then that both his Mustangs are used as backdrops.

    in reply to: I'll take the Mustang in the back of this photo! #1400555
    Archer
    Participant

    You can recognise Kermit’s P-51 by the level of shine :p

    http://www.vc10.net/florida/images/week5_8/shiny51.jpg

    in reply to: OK then, I'll fess up. #1403269
    Archer
    Participant

    Congratulations on a job well done!

    No time to sit back and enjoy though, get some more air under those wings!! 😉

Viewing 15 posts - 1,111 through 1,125 (of 1,614 total)