I’ve not said anything about this yet as for the most part I have no idea what it’s all about, but as a casual reader of the forum, all this stuff is getting very tedious indeed. Is every person who wishes to leave going to start a thread to announce it now?! :rolleyes:
Yes, a young Lancman was astonished at seeing the Lanc lose an engine at RAF St Athan in ’83, and immediately land on three right in front of him- the first time he’d seen it land- with AJ-G on the side. Scott Anderson was at the helm I do believe.
Saw the Vulcan from a distance today- it was doing it’s thing at Sunderland, I was working on Bluebird!
‘Showing it’s age’ indeed! That’s almost insulting!
I also recall buying a very good booklet about ‘Sugar’- listing missions crews etc.
‘A Very Special Lancaster’ by any chance? I still have a copy!
Fame at last! Myself (oh, and the project, LOL) are in today’s Mail On Sunday!
Plus I’ve heard from several separate and reputable sources that Rolls Royce withdrew most/all of it’s support for legacy engines after an instruction from ‘on high’, as someone very high up didn’t want a certain tin triangle to fly again.
Just rumour, of course!
Wow, look at it there, even in bits, out in the sunshine- what a contrast to the stygian gloom it usually has to lurk in!
Bravo Graham- I’ve loved following this project of yours!
My feelings on returning Just Jane to flight are quite simple at the moment, she should stay as she is, this is a unique place to re-live our past and offer the most unique chance (in the UK) of a taxi ride in her, we have an airworthy Lancaster on the airshow curcuit and should the worst happen to her then JJ is the best candidate to replace her.
My thoughts too!
Maybe you’re thinking of when the boat’s frame went to PDS Engineering, in Lancashire, to be put back together? That was in 2007.
She’s still in the North East Pete- she’s not finished yet! We’re doing well, though.
Thanks to everyone for al the support via PMs- far too many to answer individually- but all very much appreciated!
I’m just back from the Lake District National Park Authority meeting, to which the whole team went, all in our best project team wear, to be there for the vote. It was 11-4 in favour, and the news crews were everywhere- BBC, Sky, ITN, locals etc. Exciting times- guess I’d better get back down to the workshop then- we’ve got a boat to finish!
Huge, huge thanks for the offer, though if it is just a standard Lucas switch we want, we can at least, for once, buy any number we want brand new! What bliss that would be compared to sourcing some of the parts for the old girl!
Hmmm. I wonder why someone would go to the bother of drawing a square on an instrument panel with a scriber. Perhaps, maybe, it is a temporary bodge? Could it be that the switch was occupying a previously drilled hole and it’s threaded portion is a smaller diameter such that the securing nut would pull itself back through the hole on tightening?
Any good bodger would drill the right sized hole in a bit of sheet metal and cut a square around it. Perhaps then what you see in the photo are the bright edges of what is effectively a square washer?
Regards, Aerial
Quite possible- there’s a fair degree of ‘bodge’ to be found in Bluebird! Half the time in her rebuilding, we’re having to build something ‘wrong’ for it to be ‘right’! 😀