Next up is Phoenix Squadron by Rowland White.
Curlyboy
I toiled through that, with a growing suspicion that at its heart the fundamental core of the story was too weak to justify such a windy account.
No doubt nostalgic, for anyone actually involved, but I nearly called ‘Abort! about three times, and on conclusion wished I had.
It is sobering how many of those performers are no longer flying for our enjoyment.
At least 8 ( just looking at ‘revisited 2’ ) 🙁
Owl Racer accident report.
http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources.cfm?file=/5-1974%20G-AYMS.pdf
The only bit not salvaged was the 12 inches of propeller, which was not found.
In any case it is so awfully, awfully uncomfortable, what with the noise, vibration and cramped conditions.
Not a problem. I used to have an Austin Allegro.
How many of our intrepid forum members would actually take a Mosquito ride?
I have a hunch a significant number would refuse out of fear…:D
I have concerns about the accident rate of twin-engined historic aircraft.
I would only feel safe to fly in it if they did the flight on one engine.
If you like this aeroplane, you will enjoy this 4 page thread on PPRuNe
http://www.pprune.org/military-aircrew/317100-hunter-xl573.html
Tis a Kate, not a Val. sorry, can’t seem to amend thread title.:o
Probably a naive question but where do the operators of these lovely old Hawker biplanes get the spares for the Kestrel engines from? It’s not as though one can nip down to Quikfit for a new exhaust is it? Is there much commonality between the various marks of Kestrel?
I think it is pretty much fair to say that the Kestrel engines are effectively new build- there are people machining new blocks and pistons these days, and heaven knows what else.
Quite wonderful- it really looks the part in the new colour scheme.
After a little while , with some oil stains and exhaust residue, it will look even better ! It is always a dilemma, to make it look clean and loved, or worn and authentic.
The Revi sight seems very surprising indeed, but I am wondering if it is associated with some for of gun camera for training in gunnery principles rather than having been fitted, per se, with live weapons?
They certainly DID have guns. I remember a documentary, where two ME 108’s shot up a squadron of Mosquito’s on the ground, somewhere in Hertfordshire I believe.
Here is a still, though sadly the guns do not show up very well
Bit better in the 2nd shot
Had I been there, and had the aeroplane had flaps, I would have used one stage of flap for enhanced lift, and perhaps not deployed them until near rotation ( or in this case, plunge down the hill) to reduce airframe drag whilst gaining speed on T/O.
No egress from the aeroplane, but one part of the total, instant disintegration of the machine and all items on board.
The parachute was perhaps the only bit which could not smash.:(
Such dreadful luck- in a nine mile course ( or whatever ) the trimmer had to break whilst approaching the grandstand, and then the aeroplane had to roll right. So many ‘chances’ could have lessened this tragedy. Just too sad.
Sorry to strike a grumpy note, but that the paint job on that Tiger is, what’s the word now… horrible.
I know G-ANMV of old, when it was based at Booker with Tigerfly, and it used to look very authentic, in correct colours. This new paint scheme seems very odd, and the colours in the roundel are more like those seen in WW1.
It was a sad day when she crunched, whilst in the hands of Mark Walden ( not his fault ) The engine stopped in a stall turn just north of Henley on Thames, and the subsequent arrival in a field was rather on the firm side.
On reflection, the colours look quite different in the various photos ( in hangar, outside) , so perhaps the digital colour balance is making it look worse than it is.
This was posted on the Stinson forum.
”Oh dear… Have to ‘fess up. Things do come back to haunt one, don’t they? This was me, Selina, in GYYF. Of course I have already received this video a few times in the last couple of days. I think it was 1999 or 2000.
What can I say? It was hot, I had 2 passengers and thought I knew more than I did about short field takeoffs. This little field is just outside of Victoria B.C. and once we were in the air we headed straight to Nanaimo’s LONG runway to land and assess damages. The only victims, other than my pride, were the gear fairings as I did a bit of landscaping on the way out.
What was I thinking? I sure didn’t use correct short field procedures and quickly ran out of room. I knew I was in trouble and also knew I was committed to the takeoff. As we lifted off my right seat passenger, a more experienced pilot (as was the second passenger in the back), was quick enough to yell at me to push the nose down and was ready to do so himself if I didn’t. That instinct to pull up is strong especially with the tops of the trees coming at you.
Just about the best learning experience I’ve every had… And probably the scariest.
Coincidentally I met the owner of this little field this past weekend at a fly-in and we had a little reminisce about my “incident”. The field is still in use although I think they have removed a few more of the trees at the end. I don’t think I’ll be tackling it again although a little voice inside says perhaps I should go back without passengers and do it properly”
Here’s the prelim report.
NOW you can speculate..
”NTSB Identification: WPR11MA454
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Friday, September 16, 2011 in Reno, NV
Aircraft: NORTH AMERICAN/AERO CLASSICS P-51D, registration: N79111
Injuries: 11 Fatal,66 Serious.
This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed.
On September 16, 2011, about 1626 Pacific daylight time, an experimental North America P-51D, N79111, impacted terrain following a loss of control while maneuvering at Reno Stead Airport, Reno, Nevada. The airplane was registered to Aero-Trans Corp, Ocala, Florida, and operated by the pilot as Race 177 under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91. The commercial pilot sustained fatal injuries; the airplane sustained substantial damage. Casualties on the ground included 10 fatalities and 74 injured. As of the time of this preliminary report, eight of the injured remain hospitalized, some in critical condition. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident, and no flight plan had been filed for the local air race flight, which departed from Reno Stead Airport about 10 minutes before the accident.
The airplane was participating in the Reno National Championship Air Races in the last event of the day. The airplane had completed several laps and was in a steep left turn towards the home pylon when, according to photographic evidence, the airplane suddenly banked momentarily to the left before banking to the right, turning away from the race course, and pitching to a steep nose-high attitude. Witnesses reported and photographic evidence indicates that a piece of the airframe separated during these maneuvers. After roll and pitch variations, the airplane descended in an extremely nose-low attitude and collided with the ground in the box seat area near the center of the grandstand seating area.
Investigators from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the Federal Aviation Administration examined the wreckage on site. They documented the debris field and identified various components of the airplane’s control system and control surfaces. The wreckage was removed to a secure storage facility for detailed examination at a later date.
The airplane’s ground crew noted that the airplane had a telemetry system that broadcast data to a ground station as well as recorded it to a box on board the airplane. The crew provided the ground station telemetry data, which includes engine parameters and global positioning satellite system data to the NTSB for analysis. The onboard data box, which sustained crush damage, was sent to the NTSB’s Vehicle Recorder laboratory for examination. Investigators recovered pieces of a camera housing and multiple detached memory cards from the airplane’s onboard camera that were in the debris field. The memory cards and numerous still and video image recordings were also sent to the Vehicle Recorders laboratory for evaluation.
The Federal Aviation Administration and the Reno Air Race Association are parties to the investigation.”