dark light

Propstrike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,846 through 1,860 (of 3,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Airshow tragedies in the USA #1037886
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Perhaps at the end of the day I am just an uniformed forumite wishing to start up trouble :diablo::diablo: so i’ll leave it for you to ponder on.

    I really wouldn’t know where to start.

    Traffic Warden ? Park Keeper ? Postman ? Dictator ??

    You’re going to have to give us some kind of clue.

    in reply to: Airshow tragedies in the USA #1038372
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I have read Bomberboy’s mangled post three times, and still cannot really distill much sense as to what point is being made- a lot of heat but not much light :rolleyes:

    You seem a bit hasty ( not to mention belligerent) to dismiss the input of S.W, whose position seems both reasonable and reasoned. He had/has a certain public profile, and perspective based on experience, that I do not believe should be so quickly shouted down.

    in reply to: Bbmf #502988
    Propstrike
    Participant

    A bit of background info-

    The flypast was part of an evening in memory of Jim Beagley, who had been a White Waltham ground-handler (Dongler) until he got a flying job at Coventry.

    ”James Beagley was 34 when he was killed in a mid-air collision on August 17th 2008 near Coventry Airport. He was one of 5 people who died that day

    There was a period between James getting his PPL and the day he made the decision that he would be, not a pilot, but an excellent pilot, a committed career pilot. From being a humble PPL to becoming an outstanding commercial pilot is a daunting undertaking that demanded absolute dedication, unwavering confidence that despite the set-backs, and there were set-backs, success would be his provided he practised a few disciplines every day. James challenged himself, consistently setting himself greater goals; his self-discipline was his bridge between a goal and achievement.

    He valued above all else the warmth of friendship and the advice of his mentors, those that he had identified could teach him aeronautical excellence, Paul Bonhomme and Bruce Hutton were both mentor and inspiration. James chose to do even the most ordinary things extraordinarily well and when things didn’t go well he didn’t complain. ”

    James Beagley Memorial Scholarship Blog

    in reply to: Dornier 17 – RAF Museum Recovery From Goodwin Sands #1049811
    Propstrike
    Participant

    When the Wellington came out of Loch Ness, the lifting jig badly deformed as the full weight came on it, and the nose and tail section separated during the lift, though as we know, they came up later, and were reunited with the fuselage centre section.

    At the time there was a degree of dismay that a complete Wellington did not emerge. The Dornier is 25 years older, and could have a lot of sand in it, so a whole aeroplane coming up in one lift must be something of a long shot. It might be wise to keep expectations low, as it may well come to the surface in kit form.

    in reply to: THE BOMBER..WW II Film ? #1050039
    Propstrike
    Participant

    If you like dodgy graphics, implausible visual effects and brutish violence, you’ll LOVE this .:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Spitfire in blast pen RAF Harrobeer #1050993
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Is the tail up on bricks ?

    in reply to: T-6 F-AZRO #1052081
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Perhaps it was configured for the movie ‘Empire Of the Sun’ (1987) which used ‘Zerards’, and given that some Nords were also used, perhaps France was used to source the airframes.

    pics here.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/nigelblake/sets/72157626907763866/detail/

    in reply to: Miss Helen AAIB Report Update #1054375
    Propstrike
    Participant

    What I find interesting is the fact that many of those who are involved with airshows, flying warbirds, and correct R/T procedure, severely admonish those who stand in fields adjacent to DX airfield, branding them irresponsible, and potentially endangering the lives of the pilots, yet a known problem within the airfield boundary is ignored, on the basis that A/C aren’t meant to be there?

    Very good point !

    in reply to: Miss Helen AAIB Report Update #1056407
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I will try not to stray too far off topic here, but the BA incident illustrates that aeroplanes do sometimes come down in places not neccessarily intended for them to be.

    Your point about various detritus in the undershoot is true ( all of those things are installed at airports as a matter of course ) but , as seen in the photo, the stricken aeroplane needed, and had available a CLEAR level area upon which to flop, and the injuries incurred were due to a high rate of descent, rather than hitting anything.

    At Duxford, these incidents have happened before, it is quite possible they will happen again. DC-3 ‘s fly in with 30 odd pax, what if one performed a leap like the Mustang, dropped a wing, and cart-wheeled ? How will that affect ongoing operations ?

    Why plane the surface, why not fill in with soil, roll, and grass over ? It is not about moving mountains, just flattening an 18 inch lip.

    Which part of THIS to you take issue with ? ( ICAO Annex 14 )

    ”Runway End Safety Areas (RESA) are a formal means to limit the consequences when aeroplanes overrun the end of a runway during a landing or a rejected take off, or undershoot the intended landing runway.
    They are constructed to provide a cleared and graded area which is, as far as practicable, clear of all but frangible objects. It should have a surface which will enhance the deceleration of aircraft in the overrun case but should not be such as to hinder the movement of rescue and fire fighting vehicles or any other aspect of emergency response activity.
    Minor aircraft runway overruns and undershoots are a relatively frequent occurrence. Most data sources point to significant occurrences on average once a week worldwide and suggest that runway excursions overall are the fourth largest cause of airline fatalities. It has been stated by the FAA Airport Design Division that approximately 90% of runway undershoot or overruns are contained within 300 metres of the runway end. The contribution which RESAs can make to a reduction in the consequences of such over-runs has frequently been demonstrated as has the avoidable hazardous outcomes where they have not been present. ”

    in reply to: Miss Helen AAIB Report Update #1056525
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I think you’ll find that ‘the bump’ is way outside the required distances for smooth surfaces required by the CAA. 24 ‘

    I do not understand this complacent attitude.

    The existing terrain has caused problems for a number of aeroplanes ( we know of three ) and is easily and cheaply remedied.

    Duxford is a hub for old aeroplanes, and many perform test flights, and their operation is such that they may, on occassion ,have need to touch down at the earliest opportunity- witness the Mustang limping in on a failing engine.

    Even British Airways had cause to belly-flop a Boeing 777 400 metres before the threshold at Heathrow, and if BAA had adopted the Duxford mentality and filled the area with obstacles and obstructions, then the fatality free outcome of that incident may have been quite different.

    The pilot did indeed put the Mustang down where he had few options, but the fact he ‘walked away’ is by no means a happy ending, seeeing as the fighter was launched into the air, and subsequently severely damaged. Had the aeroplane turned into a fireball, I wonder if the same ‘Ho -Hum ‘ attitude would still prevail.

    It seems to me astonishing that such a hazard remains, after 25 years of intensive historic aircraft operation on the site.:mad:

    in reply to: Miss Helen AAIB Report Update #1057996
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Ten tons of top soil and a morning’s work would sort that out.

    Make a scalloped transition between the two levels, and smooth out the sharp lip.

    A reminder of what we are talking about.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XuMylC7gSc

    in reply to: General Discussion #295293
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I don’t recognize my country.

    We elect, and pay for a government to protect us. That contract has been broken. The policy seems to be appeasement, ie don’t upset ‘them’ and perhaps they will go away. That has never worked, and will not work now.

    London has not burned like this since the Luftwaffe last came.

    in reply to: Tottenham Riots #1842352
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I don’t recognize my country.

    We elect, and pay for a government to protect us. That contract has been broken. The policy seems to be appeasement, ie don’t upset ‘them’ and perhaps they will go away. That has never worked, and will not work now.

    London has not burned like this since the Luftwaffe last came.

    in reply to: Dutch make B-24 Liberator(2002) #1065057
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Pretty sure it was in this book- Aviation Archeology

    http://www.flyingbooks.co.uk/acatalog/Aviation-Archaeology.html#a3371

    It was a cockpit section, in an orchard in the 1960’s. Scrapped, I believe.

    in reply to: Heavy Spitfire landing ca 1944 #1065062
    Propstrike
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 1,846 through 1,860 (of 3,488 total)