dark light

Propstrike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,876 through 1,890 (of 3,488 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: FJ Fury in the weeds at Oshkosh… #1079741
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Seriously unimpressive response by the emergency services 🙁

    If I were in a burning aeroplane ( ie a more serious incident than this) I would hope they could be there before almost 2 minutes had elapsed.

    Surely they should be suited up, in their wagons, beside the runway, and rolling within 10 seconds.

    in reply to: FJ Fury in the weeds at Oshkosh… #1080037
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Ah yes, the thing like a cousin of the Sabre, not a variant of the Sea Fury.

    in reply to: Fournier Boy Finally Gets A Fournier! #1082124
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Stumbled across an Aeroplane Monthly from 1989 ( B17 on cover- Memphis Belle filming) .

    There is 2 page article on the Skyhawks team by Joy Fraser, with some nice air/airs.

    Have you seen/got this ?

    Propstrike
    Participant

    A moment to remember the late Paul Portelli (much missed member at West London Aero Club) who commissioned the rebuild of his cherished Spit, and sadly never got to fly in it.

    He would have been very proud at yesterdays celebration.

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I P9374 #1082236
    Propstrike
    Participant

    If the idea grows in the public consciousness that this aeroplane is in some sense suspect, and that prejudice in time becomes received wisdom in the ‘industry’, then its value (ÂŁ) will be down-graded commensuatly.

    I do not suppose the project was instigated purely with a profit motive, but if the value of the article is driven down by public disdain, this surely erodes the motivation to make any more, and that would be a great shame.

    This is not ’emperor’s new clothes’ syndrome, and nobody need pretend anything is other than it is, but too much ‘putting the boot in’ may have unwanted consequences.

    in reply to: Douglas Boston wreck found in Italy #1084305
    Propstrike
    Participant
    in reply to: New Aircraft At Shuttleworth #1084491
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Nah – Henlow of course 🙂

    in reply to: Duxford, Again…. #1084968
    Propstrike
    Participant

    You’re only making it worse.

    in reply to: New Aircraft At Shuttleworth #1085851
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Or why not sell the Spitfire and commission a 2nd Hind as well as the Demon- that makes even less sense :rolleyes:

    The foremost concern of the Trust is, I imagine, to maintain commercial viability and keep the public coming, as without sufficient revenue, there can be no airworthy collection.

    The views often reflected here ( hard-line Hamas of the aeronut movement 😉 ) are not neccessarily those of the broader public, and whilst we might wail about the loss of Jean Batten’s Gull , to many people it is a boring silver Proctor, and by no means a crowd puller.

    Sure, they have some sort of a broad collection policy, but they are not entomologists pinning butterflies to a board, to be classified and arrayed according to nomenclature.

    The whole point is that it is a living collection, and they should be supported in their endeavours to run it as a evolving, dynamic enterprise. There is a great British tradition of giving people what you think they should have , rather than what they want, and over the last 30 years our industry and commerce have been crucified for it.

    A final thought, the summer season seems to get windier by the year, and whilst the ‘flimsies’ are cancelled and hangared ( yet again ) the Wildcat can be blattering round the sky,able to provide an airshow, that keeps the money coming.

    FLY NAVY !

    in reply to: Super Corsair Race #74 has flown…. (vid) #1086269
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Never has a film so needed editing :rolleyes:

    Still, jolly interesting.

    in reply to: Help understanding METARs #411256
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Visibility is not restricted.

    Don’t expect to see that very often 🙁

    in reply to: Booker Airfield Mega-Stadium Plan Booted Out ! #411361
    Propstrike
    Participant

    This is the stuff we like…….:)

    ”This evening sense prevailed and the plans for the unwanted stadium at Booker have finally been stopped.

    No more of our hard earned Council Tax will be wasted on the ridiculous scheme and the countryside and area of outstanding natural beauty surrounding the Booker aerodrome is now safe.

    Tonight it took just four votes in a unanimous decision in the Council Chamber to end the scheme which has blighted the people of Booker since July 2008.

    Its unbelievable that this farcical charade really has been going on for three years but thankfully now the scheme is consigned to the dustbin of history hopefully we will hear no more of it.

    When you look at the plans it amazes me they got this far indeed in tonight’s debate one councillor was reported as saying “There are more holes in this plan than in Swiss Cheese”.

    In recent times I don’t think there has been a project that has draw such outrage and disgust from the people of Wycombe.

    So what will happen now?

    Well, a few days ago a spokesperson for the rugby club seemed to imply that they would consider leaving Wycombe if they did not get the new stadium. Personally I think this is the best option.

    After causing so much upset and anguish for the residents of Booker and Wycombe the last thing we need is for them to be festering away over at Sands.

    Tonight’s decision was a great victory for democracy and it shows that if enough people speak up and protest on the streets then their voices will be listened to.

    I would like to think that through this blog I played my part, however small, in highlighting the stupidity of the scheme and in stopping this unwanted stadium.

    Every time I see a “Booker bomber” flying overhead I look up and think to myself how lucky we are to have such a marvellous facility as the Booker aerodrome so nearby.

    Let’s hope tonight’s decision sends out the signal that Wycombe will not give up its green belt for any tin pot scheme no matter how ludicrous and wacky it may be.

    We value the green belt that surrounds Wycombe and the townspeople will rise up to defend it if needs be.

    Ivor’s Blog- Bucks Free Press ”

    in reply to: Seafire SX336 #1034695
    Propstrike
    Participant

    A 2nd thread was started and again locked, today.

    I think the perceived wisdom is that there is little further to say just now, apart from rather circular, uninformed and sensitive conjecture. What happened is now well known, and how/why will emerge in due course.

    In general terms, I think the forum should not be gagged, but if members will not self-moderate at sensitive times such as this, then a bit of external prodding is to be expected.

    in reply to: Bristol F2b left handed prop #1035858
    Propstrike
    Participant

    I have sympathy for your position, and I too would feel a bit miffed. It reminds me of the individual who donated his airworthy DH. 60 Moth to the Shuttleworth Collection, who sold it some years later. No doubt the reasons were valid, but somehow not quite in the spirit of the gesture.

    The propeller is no doubt a beautiful and desirable item, but what it means now to present day cadets is questionable, it may as well be from the ark.

    Wherever it ends up, it will be with someone who cherishes it, and the funds will go to the squadron. If it helps buy a new minibus, which enables participation in valuable, character building activities, then its legacy is real, and it will have made a difference.

    The RAF of today is vastly different to the one 40 years ago, and as an ex- cadet, I have seen how much that has changed also. The history and tradition is preserved elsewhere, if you seek it out, but if they choose to let go the trappings and artifacts of last century, I suppose we have to allow them that.

    in reply to: Duxford, Again…. #1036524
    Propstrike
    Participant

    Forgive my ignorance but is the Red Bull P38 the one that used to race at Reno called White Lightning?

    If you want a bit of background info on this aeroplane, and the recent history which brought it to Europe, this is a very interesting extensive interview with Ladd Gardner, his training on flying warbirds, and the day he force landed it, thus ending its flying days in the USA.

    Just a little bit here-

    ”As soon as I hit I remember going kind of uuaahh.. when I hit, thinking, ‘man that was hard!’ I hit the ground hard! I remember, actually before that, I remember coming along, the ground was coming up, and I remember it felt like I was hauling ass, I was going way too fast. I remember there was a power line ahead of me and beyond that, a whole line of trees, it was thick woods from that point on. I thought, ‘man I’m gonna go crusin right across this field right about a foot above the ground and just go sailing right into those trees underneath those power lines!’ So I reached and grabbed the flap handle and thought ’maybe this’ll slow me down’ and the flaps didn’t come down but that’s OK, it worked out better. I just kind of nosed the airplane over a little bit and just kind of forced it onto the ground.”

    http://www.aafo.com/racing/history/white_lightnin-1/index.html

Viewing 15 posts - 1,876 through 1,890 (of 3,488 total)