dark light

Cherry Ripe

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 480 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: U2 over UK? #2221839
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Interesting idea!

    Also four or five of the FlyBE Dash-8s are in the new livery, with a dark purple fuselage and white tailcone. Underside of tailplanes remains white.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231969[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: U2 over UK? #2223345
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Out of interest what colour are these aircraft being seen as and does it match the colour we see on the ground?

    In flight they almost disappear into the background, a very flat non-specular dark grey paint I think. Usually it is only a contrail ( descending through lower alts ) that gives them away.

    Interestingly the Rhodesians discovered something similar with their Canberras back in the 1960s; a light-coloured underside actually cause more prominence, a bright white cross in the sky, and it seemed contrary to comon sense but a dark-earth belly caused them to disappear up at 45,000 ft.

    in reply to: U2 over UK? #2223373
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Current rotation of U-2s through Fairford is roughly fortnightly. Another one arrived in from Beale yesterday. They take a northerly Atlantic route and then head south over western Scotland at ‘in excess’ of 60,000 ft. Descent into Fairford is quite rapid.

    Glasgow has a good view, usually. Those in Liverpool should catch them contrailing at about 45,000 ft.

    Perhaps the Scottish Defence Force will dig-out a few old Lightnings and dust-off the U-2 interception profile 😉

    in reply to: Which is the best anti ship aircraft #2223679
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    My guess is the Super Etendart with Excocet. AFAIK the only combat proven system.

    A few others that come to mind:

    A-6s with Harpoon off the Libyan coast in 1986. Same again against Iranian craft in 1988.

    Lynx and Sea Skua in the Gulf in 1991.

    in reply to: SCOTTISH AIR FORCE #2224416
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Forget fast air? …
    So, who do you suggests patrols all that airspace? The RAF?

    No-one. There is no realistic air threat to Scotland in the next 20 years. They need to provide MPA and SAR cover up to the Shetlands, nothing pointier than that in my opinion.

    Anyhow, the RAF haven’t patrolled the GIUK in nearly two decades. They do occasional point-QRAs closer to the mainland.

    in reply to: SCOTTISH AIR FORCE #2224507
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    I am sceptical that operating 12 Typhoons is by any means cost-effective. The Austrian example appears to apply.

    Cherry Ripe’s proposal: forget fast-air and QRA. Scottish military operations would / will be in-theatre and primarily in aid of civilian powers, at least for the first decade.

    Buy a dozen CN235 MPAs in the Irish configuration and some CN295s in transport / passenger config.

    Add medium helicopters for airlift and SAR and call it a day; bonus points for AW139s with commonality with Irish Air Corps, or NH90s for Benelux compatibility.

    in reply to: Airforce One at Boscombe Down #2226781
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Four V-22s followed by two Super Stallions (I think)

    Good catch! That’s actually a Merlin ( you can see the BERP rotor tips,for instance ).

    Mr Obama was in a VH-60 that slipped-out ahead of the Ospreys. He doesn’t travel in the tilt-rotors, those are reserved for press and security.

    Correction: motorcade for POTUS. Security via the Ospreys.

    in reply to: UAE air force in action #2229585
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    And no one would buy AMRAAM if they will only be sent via Fedex 2 days after a war started

    Incredible though it is, that is fairly common with AMRAAM.

    Taiwan, for example, bought AMRAAM in 2000 but they were stockpiled in the USA until a batch were released about five years later when the PLAAF received BVRAAMs.

    Thailand and Singapore similarly ‘bought’ missiles but only received batches years later when the USA determined that local tensions demanded it.

    in reply to: C-130 60th! #2230227
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    I will never understand why EADS went after the same niche without any breakthrough in hand (stealth, VTOL or whatever)…

    Do you mean the Transall? Although it was about the same size as the C-130, the Transall was a pure tactical airlifter more comparable in mission to the C-123; able to operate into short, soft strips out of bounds to the C-130.

    The An-12 was probably the closest rival to the C-130’s mission but suffered from Antonov’s lack of consideration for proper full-cabin pressurization, which stemmed from a rushed rear-door design.

    To be fair to Antonov, they did eventualy develop an excellent rear-ramp / platform / pressure-door design for the An-26 and subsequent, but never went back to rework the -12. But Lockheed did it right first-time.

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2231374
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Think for instance of a small charge in the M-1’s ammo compartment that can be detonated from a distance.

    Awesome! Now imagine the layers of information security and physical security that you’d need around that, and the processes associated. A splendid new target for Chinese hackers

    Easier, cheaper and safer just to plink it with a Paveway.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2231790
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Does the Indian Air Force need every transport aircraft to be tactically capable?

    If not, an A330F will move the same payload as a C-17 at half the cost. A 777F will move 100 tonnes. Air India has a few 777LRs sitting looking for a buyer… same airframe as the freighter.

    Focus the tactical assets where they are needed and move the bulk stuff on pallets. Just because the USAF lost the plot in the 1980s doesn’t mean every air force has to do logisitics like they do ( and they had to spend huge $$$ on leased pallet capacity in the 2000s ).

    in reply to: 120mm vs 125mm #2232664
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Which is best? I have heard of 120 mm is more stable than 125 mm, 125 mm suitable for tanks loaded automatically?

    An advantage of Soviet 125mm ( shared with British 120mm ) was separate loading of projectile and charge.

    But Soviet 125mm ordnance traditionally suffered from manufacturing defects / limitations / economics that rendered overall performance below that of Western 120mm equivalents.

    So ‘best’ in terms of performance and consistency would be a Western 120mm ordnance, assuming autoloading wasn’t required. Exercise for the reader to determine between rifled / smoothbore and bagged / integrated charge.

    in reply to: Kurdish air force #2232901
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Why should the U.S. give Iran anything? The Iranian government hates the U.S. To them, we’re the “great satan”, why should we give them ANY help? That doesn’t make sense.

    To the contrary, it makes a great deal of sense.

    No nation ‘likes’ or ‘hates’ any other nation, any positive relations are based on mutual benefit. Internal PR ( ‘great Satan’, ‘axis of Evil’ et al ) has nothing to do with real politics.

    Iran is assisting Iraqi and Kurdish forces in fighting IS, which is a greater threat to US interests in the region, and globally, than Iran. Iran is the backstop that will prevent IS spreading eastwards and encircling Baghdad in a pincer, so Iran will be supported.

    We in the West mock Iran for keeping 40-year-old F-5s flying with local ‘modifications’ and making rip-offs of Chinese copies of M16s, but today those weapons are what will check IS.

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2233555
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    B-58 with 4 mk83 nuclear bombs and its usual underfuselage pod :

    Those look a little too curvaceous for 83s in my opinion; their usual case was a bluff-ended, parallel-sided cylinder:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231028[/ATTACH]

    Also they entered service with TAC in the early 1980s, long after SAC had retired the Hustler.

    I would say B61 or Mk28-RI for that Hustler.

    in reply to: US led coalition against IS #2233743
    Cherry Ripe
    Participant

    Apples to oranges. Iraq have a decent army capable of kicking out the insurgents with help from NATO air power.

    The Iraqi army was operating under conditions of complete air dominance. Supporting air power could pick-off IS convoys at will – there are plenty of videos on YouTube of Mi-35s destroying technicals and supply vehicles without a single return shot being fired.

    Thousands of tons of supplies have been fed quietly from Iran. Iranian officers are assisting the Iraqis in the field.

    Yet the Iraqi army broke and fled any time they werer pushed. Why do you think they’d do any differently if there were stars-and-bars on the aircraft?

    Unfortunately the Iraqi army has become a political play-thing for various factions in power. Capable officers have been removed because they don’t align with a particular sponsor’s tribalism – when Mr Hussein did that we tut-tutted and said he was a blinkered fool.

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 480 total)