stunning photos guys, I love the pigeon shot!
I’ll let you guess what this is. Should not be too hard.
Le Louvre! 😀
‘New York, New York’; clever shot.
🙂
stunning photos guys, I love the pigeon shot!
I’ll let you guess what this is. Should not be too hard.
Le Louvre! 😀
‘New York, New York’; clever shot.
🙂
wow, thats a very tame bird. How did you get it on your arm?
wow, thats a very tame bird. How did you get it on your arm?
The photo has been accepted after an appeal. it took two uploads and two appeals but persistance pays off!
one of my all time favourites:


balls! my favourite game! :diablo: :rolleyes: :p


and for a laugh…
one of my all time favourites:


balls! my favourite game! :diablo: :rolleyes: :p


and for a laugh…
thats what i think, but he is determined to get the photo on – especially after seeing that this equally nice photo was added today –
I didnt start the thread to make a ‘i’ve got more than you’ competition. i want to see how far peeps on here take their hobby.
It makes me wonder; we visit airports quite frequently, judging by the number of threads in this forum, but what do we go there for? To take pictures, or watch planes? If we spend the hours staring down a viewfinder, then we miss out on just being able to stare at and admire the aircraft as they go by. But, don’t get me wrong, i love photography.
An example was when i first saw the An124 at East Mids. It came down the taxiway that was no more than 50 metres in front of us. This enormous aircraft rolled past, and i spent the time photographing it. 66 photos of this one aircraft – trigger happy but it was the first time i had seen it. I realised that i had actually missed the aircraft. i was looking at it through a screen/viewfinder and not with my own eyes. So i felt like i had missed out.
Do i share that feeling with just myself?
What about the 767 a few years back that ran out of fuel and landed on a disused airstrip. I think it was in the USA.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider
another great example of airmanship and skill from the pilots.
I thought they were RAMs :confused:
No, they are ‘RATs’ – Ram Air Turbines. 🙂
All modern commercial passenger aircraft have a ‘RAT’
Thanks Sam! 🙂
i think its the same aircraft. the satellite (or whatever it was) that took the images takes one image, has moved a set, uniform distance, and taken another shot of the next piece of land in sequence. each image has captured the same aircraft – and each 747 is slightly larger than the previous becuase the aircraft is climbing.
they certainly can’t be different aircraft, taking off one after the other, because the distance between them is just ridiculously close, unless the delay between each photo is longer than just a few seconds – i.e. a few minutes and the photo taker has moved slightly less. separation between large, departing aircraft has got to be atleast a couple of miles and the separation between each view of the 747 definately doesnt look like a couple of miles.
a similar view was once possible on google earth at LHR – an Air France Airbus was visible a number of times at different moments in its landing roll along the runway – the aircraft/satelite that took the images has just moved/changed what it was looking at and taken an image at every x second interval.
thats how i see it anyway. 🙂
bring it back to EMA
no, please don’t. it would mean that i would find it very hard to resist the temptation of making another trip to the airport, when i really should be getting on with Uni work. 😀 😀 😉 :diablo: