RE: The Alamo

Thanks for the explanation. So I suppose the “Embassy at London is simply a festive thing, more than real revindicative intentions. Does the same conditions apply to other states of Union or only to Texas?.

RE: Iraq; a question of oil.

I mean, that Israel and Iraq should fullfill UN resolutions. Glad we agree on that.

RE: Iraq; a question of oil.

>>i do agree with the US droping the nuke on japan,

Under any circunstance, and under any moral consideration a nuclear attack over civilians is justified. It´s an attrocity. I feel it´s extremely obscene and cruel. I won´t accept the argument of saving soldiers lifes, with civilians soul. Life is life and even more children, woman and elderly.

RE: Iraq; a question of oil.

>
>>>16 UNSC resolutions. UNSC is irrelevant.
>
>
>
>16 UNSC resolutions, if Iraq can get away with it and so
>many people sympathize with Saddam, the US can get away with
>one non-resolution right? Afterall there was no UNSC
>resolution telling the US NOT to attack Iraq.

How many UNSC resolutions have Israel unfulfilled?. Superpowers vetos have made UNSC irrelevant. Nobody sympathize with Saddam, but his people shouldn´t pay for the consecuences.

RE: UN security council

UN forces should have real power to make UN resolutions to be fullfilled.

RE: How old are you?

I was 25 at the time of the French Revolution. Blood makes me feel young.
“A man is as young as a woman wants to” 🙂

RE: EUROCORPS holds exercise in Germany

I´ll be happy to have more news about it.

RE: The Alamo

Vortex, I have a question about Texas. Having travelled there I wasn´t able that anyone could explain to me, why it´s called a “free state”. Having lived in London and seeing that there´s a Texan Embassy just off Trafalgar Square, I wonder if there´s a kind of independence movement in the State, or simply the “free state” title refers to El Alamo events?.