You appear to be trying to make a distinction without a difference, it doesn’t really matter which particular system they use to do the job.
No, that particular part was dealing with many of the inaccuracies in the reporting. I said more than once in there that all of them were partially at fault over the whole mess, the point of the article was not to decide who was right or wrong but to illustrate how the media has managed to foul up the reporting of the entire incident by eliminating standard practices such as fact checking.
Phantom,
You could as easily say though that the F-4 had no sea-skimming antiship missile whereas, in the timeframe, Viggen had Rb04E. Does one capability trump another?.
When did they start using ASM-1 in Japan and Gabriel in Israel?
WTF. What is with all these idiots doing things purely to antagonize the Russians? The Ukraine is an S-300P and S-300V user, they don’t need to be worrying too much about Russian SS-21 and SS-26 strikes. They’re going to be covered by the ABM network split between Poland and the Czech Republic. Why would they want to make this kind of announcement right now? Do they want to see if Putin’s Army has enough gas in the tanks to make a left hook and ford the crossing between Russia and the Crimean?
Read the next line of that article, and then the interview with the BP exec stating that they are not aware of any bombing in the area. That line also says 51 missile strikes. That suggests either an SS-21 or MLRS attack. That is not a bombing raid by an aircraft, is it? Ergo, based on the actual evidence at hand and not the asinine reporting, there were NO bombing raids on the pipeline.
Note that I never said that the pipeline wasn’t attacked at all.
It does beg the question though why didn’t the Russians use PGMs when operatiing in proximity to civilians.
How close were they really dropping bombs to civillians though? We know the oil pipeline and airport attack stories were totally false, what else has been fabricated or at least confused with artillery or missile strikes?
I won’t admit to being FULLY objective, I did ignore the whole “who started firing on August 1st” issue to get to the main points I wanted to cover dealing with the media’s treatment of Russia during the entire affair after 7 August.
The US intelligence services are overtaxed by the Middle East already or overrated.
Not exactly overtaxed. Each command (EUCOM, CENTCOM) has its own intelligence branch responsible for monitoring that area. This was handled by EUCOM, not CENTCOM, who handles the Middle East. I wouldn’t exactly say overrated either; if you watch Russian CBW facilities for decades and then see something similar in Iraq, what would you think? It’s not Hollywood, satellites and sensors cannot see through buildings and take samples of whats inside. Yes the intelligence community managed to dork up Iraq in more ways than one, but it wasn’t a deliberate fabrication of evidence. And at any rate those people wouldn’t be the ones primarily responsible for monitoring the Georgian situation either.
Here’s my take on a lot of the (primarily Western) media foul ups regarding the Russia-Georgia thing:
http://geimint.blogspot.com/2008/08/russia-georgia-disinformation.html
The Bank Job with Jason Statham, on Blu-ray. I’ll watch anything with Statham, he’s one of my favorite actors. This one was a really good film I thought. The way they twisted a bunch of historical events together to come up with an interesting and plausible plot was very well done. What’s really amusing is the historical featurette looking at the story. You have scholars talking about how MI5 would never do anything like that, countered by an ex-5 employee saying they sure did operate that way sometimes 😀 Anyway, a really good heist flick.
The Bank Job with Jason Statham, on Blu-ray. I’ll watch anything with Statham, he’s one of my favorite actors. This one was a really good film I thought. The way they twisted a bunch of historical events together to come up with an interesting and plausible plot was very well done. What’s really amusing is the historical featurette looking at the story. You have scholars talking about how MI5 would never do anything like that, countered by an ex-5 employee saying they sure did operate that way sometimes 😀 Anyway, a really good heist flick.
US says there was no evidence of any Russian buildup prior to the conflict:
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gj_jyRnqBYekXz2MyszBj6k_ZMtw
Russia is, therefore, really smart or really stupid. They’re smart if they effectively utilized their resources to get the proper forces to the region quickly, or stupid if they decided to have a war but failed to plan and prepare for it. Which one is more likely, I wonder?
Libya fired a number of S-200s in 1986 at US aircraft during ELDORADO CANYON. Don’t recall that having worked out very well.
I told you, Arabs aren’t so smart in using a sophiscated obselete weapons.
Then how would your obsolete S-200 have changed any situation.
Libya fired a number of S-200s in 1986 at US aircraft during ELDORADO CANYON. Don’t recall that having worked out very well.
2 decades of experience means he started around ’88, so he wasn’t able to get any experience over Afghanistan. Plus these were BACKFIRE crewmembers, meaning that they weren’t going to be seeing any real time over Chechnya either. So it’s not like they had the opportunity for any significant combat experience until now. Also, as they were on a recon mission it was likely a Tu-22MR. There are very few of those around and you’d therefore want a more senior crew aboard, especially going into hostile airspace.
They probably used the most senior and experienced pilots, who would naturally be the oldest.
[color=red]20 pages, start over![/color]