[color=red]Actually this thread is getting locked anyway, it’s hit the 20 page limit 😀 But yes, if you want to talk about Iraqi immigrants and tax burdens, take it to the GD forum.[/color]
And where are those files you were going to send me? 😀
Does not look like AESA type to me.. :confused:
BTW, how do you guys read AESA? Is is something along the lines of [:aeeesah:] of do you just spell it? 😎
I usually read it as AYsah on this side of the pond.
This game is outSTANDING. WAY too much fun! I got the special edition, and the packaging of the game is hilarious.
Daz, get a 360, we can get on XBox Live and run a mafia crew in multiplayer 😀
This game is outSTANDING. WAY too much fun! I got the special edition, and the packaging of the game is hilarious.
Daz, get a 360, we can get on XBox Live and run a mafia crew in multiplayer 😀
The top set of images most definitely shows a FLANKER, but you’re right, the object in the bottom could easily be an F-15. The wing trailing edge looks straight to me, implying that it’s probably not a FULCRUM.
1.44. 1.42, if it was actually completed as rumored, is not known to have ever flown.
(nitpick mode off 😀 )
[color=red]1MAN and Jon James, this is your final warning. Your repeated back-and-forth name-calling and insult slinging will end as of this moment. The next person to act in a disrespectful and childish manner will be finding a new forum to call home.[/color]
Watched Cloverfield. The hand-held aspect was actually done pretty well. I’d like to see a sequel (which they clearly have in mind if you watched the making the monster featurette). I felt that the movie itself was forcibly toned-down. Add JJ Abrams and crew to the list of Hollywood sellouts sacrificing quality and realism in order to get a PG-13 rating. Come on, people. This was New York City. There is absolutely no way in hell that people aren’t at the very least going to be dropping the f-bomb because of a gigantoid monster trashing the place 😀 Any movie supposed to be a horror movie that isn’t rated R has something wrong with it in my opinion.
Watched Cloverfield. The hand-held aspect was actually done pretty well. I’d like to see a sequel (which they clearly have in mind if you watched the making the monster featurette). I felt that the movie itself was forcibly toned-down. Add JJ Abrams and crew to the list of Hollywood sellouts sacrificing quality and realism in order to get a PG-13 rating. Come on, people. This was New York City. There is absolutely no way in hell that people aren’t at the very least going to be dropping the f-bomb because of a gigantoid monster trashing the place 😀 Any movie supposed to be a horror movie that isn’t rated R has something wrong with it in my opinion.
Nice of them to catch on. Loot at what I wrote on my blog last December:
“Yulin
Yulin is the latest naval facility to be associated with the PLAN’s SSBN force. In December of 2007 images appeard on the internet of a Jin-class SSBN pierside at the Yulin submarine facility. Until this point Yulin had never been visited by nor been the home port to a Chinese SSBN. While it is possible that this represents a port of call by a new Type 094 SSBN making a long-distance sortie in Chinese waters, it is also possible that the vessel sighted there will now call Yulin home, giving China two separate operational SSBN port facilities, with both the North Sea Fleet and the South Sea Fleet having an SSBN contingent.”
😀
I wonder if the Syrians have gone to the expense of deploying AAA/SAMs around the new building just in case?
TJ
There is an SA-6 unit based just south of Dayr az Zawr to the southeast. They could have been moved to the site if it was felt they were needed, but then you’d still be left with SAM systems in a new position leading to questions as to why they were there.
If all this was true, the U.S. would have also used this oportunaty to say,” This nuke building, aslo proves that our reports in 04/05 that Iraq moved thier WMD’s to Syria are correct”
What does that have to do with Syria building a nuclear reactor? Absolutely nothing.
You don’t call the supplier every time you need a part. You maintain a stock of supplies to perform maintenance as required. Germany could easily have transferred spares to maintain one flyable aircraft without feeling the effects. Or, for that matter, the German expertise could have been used with leftover Moldovan spares acquired from either Moldova itself or enough of the Moldovan FULCRUMs to keep a solitary example airborne.
You guys might find this interesting. I’ve detailed Cypriot and Greek S-300PMU-1 facilities, as well as possible Cypriot Buk-M1 facilities.
http://geimint.blogspot.com/2008/05/cypriot-missile-crisis.html
According to this picture on a russian forum about PAK-FA (http://forum.sukhoi.ru/showthread.php?t=47703&page=54) – it is more like combined FB-22 and YF-23 (and something from Flanker of course) :dev2: :confused: :rolleyes:
PAK-FA will carry AMRAAM and AIM-9X?
😀
The S-300PS/PM was being exploited at Tolicha Peak as of November 2006 when components were captured on satellite imagery. The test pad is here: 37°18’49.18″N 116°47’33.77″W
As to the MiG-29s. Could the USA keep MiG-29s flying? I’d think so. You’d need a source of spares, and a bunch of maintenance documentation, preferably supplied by trained personnel who can aid you in learning how to maintain certain systems. The question would be whether or not these things could have been made available to the USA. What you need is a foreign supplier, going on the assumption that Russia wouldn’t be too keen on doing it. The question is then whether or not such a nation existed.
You guys are all forgetting that Germany was a MiG-29 user, aren’t you.