dark light

SOC

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,471 through 1,485 (of 10,347 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Flanker maintenance issues #2470607
    SOC
    Participant

    Has Russia had a problem with aircraft tires for a while? When I saw the MiG-29 at Farnborough in 1988 the tires were damn near bald.

    in reply to: What if: Su-47 and Mikoyan Project 1.44 #2470608
    SOC
    Participant

    I’ve seen that before, that’s a hilarious image, Ken 😀

    WRT internal bays on a MiG 1.44, there appeared to be revetments for semi-recessed weapons the size of an R-77.

    in reply to: General Discussion #339926
    SOC
    Participant

    Today, I watched Predator and AVP:R on Blu-Ray. Predator is just a classic, and the HD version is awesome. There is a little graininess in the grey background sky at the very beginning when the helo comes in to drop off Arnie’s team, but overall it looks fantastic. AVP:R, on the other hand, is pretty much flawless. Ignoring the movie itself, the picture quality is the best I have seen by far by anything HD-related. Pause the movie, count the raindrops. It’s awesome. Whoever was responsible for the transfer of the film to Blu-ray did leave the brightness turned way down, so it appears a little too dark, but if you jack up the brightness then it’s fine. Normally jacking up the brigthness too much can wash out your picture and result in a loss of clarity, but not in this case (as like I said, the brightness was obviously too low on the disc). Apart from that minor nitpick, it’s a really excellent example of what HD videos can do. Plus, the movie is just a great slag-fest of fun, and there’s at least one new scene in the unrated version that makes it obvious why it was deleted to make sure they got no higher than an R rating.

    in reply to: The Last Film You Saw…. 2!!! #1911015
    SOC
    Participant

    Today, I watched Predator and AVP:R on Blu-Ray. Predator is just a classic, and the HD version is awesome. There is a little graininess in the grey background sky at the very beginning when the helo comes in to drop off Arnie’s team, but overall it looks fantastic. AVP:R, on the other hand, is pretty much flawless. Ignoring the movie itself, the picture quality is the best I have seen by far by anything HD-related. Pause the movie, count the raindrops. It’s awesome. Whoever was responsible for the transfer of the film to Blu-ray did leave the brightness turned way down, so it appears a little too dark, but if you jack up the brightness then it’s fine. Normally jacking up the brigthness too much can wash out your picture and result in a loss of clarity, but not in this case (as like I said, the brightness was obviously too low on the disc). Apart from that minor nitpick, it’s a really excellent example of what HD videos can do. Plus, the movie is just a great slag-fest of fun, and there’s at least one new scene in the unrated version that makes it obvious why it was deleted to make sure they got no higher than an R rating.

    in reply to: Fulcrum Questions #2470775
    SOC
    Participant

    The original K was based on the original M. The new Indian K is based on the M2. Note how single-seat Indian Ks have the same two-place cockpit canopy as the M2, kinda like the single seat L-159s.

    in reply to: What if: Su-47 and Mikoyan Project 1.44 #2470779
    SOC
    Participant

    Electro-optical.

    in reply to: Long Range Infared Guided Missiles? #1787397
    SOC
    Participant

    Was that the ARMIGER HARM replacement?

    in reply to: F-22A Pics, News & Speculations Thread #2470816
    SOC
    Participant

    RCS 1/1000th of the F-15. But whether it is just frontal or all aspect not known.

    Probably frontal, where you’ll get the lowest figure. It won’t be all-around, that’s for sure. Point a radar directly at the top of a Raptor and I bet you get a big fat return.

    The value of the F-15 RCS taken whether it is either the minimum frontal RCS of RAM employed F-15 or a normal one F-15 carrying 4 AIM-9, 4 AMRAAM and 2 drops tanks is also I guess is also not given?

    Probably frontal, and clean. In my experience these figures are usually for clean aircraft, as different weapon fits will have different effects.

    As for the rest, I don’t think there have been any definitely officially confirmed figures released? And that includes any RCS figure, those are classified and likely to stay that way! Your best bet for getting a good handle on the specs is to find the Aerofax volume on the F-22. It apparently caused quite a stir when it was released due to an impression that too much sensitive information was given to the author for publication, including some of the photos. If you want a good starting point, that’s the place to look. And it’s a pretty good book at any rate.

    in reply to: What if: Su-47 and Mikoyan Project 1.44 #2470820
    SOC
    Participant

    It could have been capable of taking on AMRAAMS but what about low observable air breathing HAVE DASH IIs or dual-band semi-active AAAMs both of which had EO or IR terminal seekers?

    LO missiles like HAVE DASH II would have been irrelevant if they had active seekers; the system would have detected the seeker emissions, not the missile itself. The reason behind the LO missiles, IIRC, was to allow for external carriage.

    A SARH seeker would have been fooled the same way as an active one. There are systems that can counter IR seekers, but an EO seeker would have been another story.

    MiG-1.42 would have at least 3 PESA radars

    The quoted avionics fit was two radars, the primary system in the nose and the secondary system in one of the two tail fairings.

    But they couldn´t make the “thing” work, it was a failure, by late 2002 the work was abandoned.

    I doubt it was a total failure, they claimed to have mastered the first system and were moving on to perfecting a second and developing a third. One of the latter two could have been an attempt to produce a sustainable all-around plasma cloud (i.e. IR seeker source!), which is probably beyond the realm of possibility at this point.

    in reply to: What if: Su-47 and Mikoyan Project 1.44 #2470905
    SOC
    Participant

    The Keldysh Plasma Stealth was a technological dead end,

    That depends on what you believe I think. Was it going to be some huge cloud hiding the aircraft from radar all the time? I think not. It is more likely that the system was intended to serve as an active ECM system to defeat tracking radars and active radar weapons. There was a JDW article around the time that the 1.44 was unveiled that talked about the Keldysh device and IIRC there were some British (BA I believe) scientists who validated the concept but couldn’t quite figure out how the Russians made the thing work. The Keldysh system was likely an offshoot of or the same system that was to mask the Meteorit missile system from radar. In theory it is a sound concept, as long as you aren’t expecting the total stealth I described above. RWR detects missile seeker emissions, Keldysh activates to fool the seeker, and pilot executes a high-g maneuver to escape the missile’s FOV to avoid reacquisition. As a reactive system it does make a lot of sense, if they got it to work. At one point they were even offering a related system for export.

    and i´m trying to figure out what exactly the Mig 1.42 brings to the table that the original Typhoon tranche 2/3 Eurojet 230 (that engine was tested in 1998) equiped didn´t have…

    Superagility. While the Eurocanards are very agile aircraft, it would appear that the Russians went almost overboard in some of their aircraft with respect to aerodynamic performance. They seemed designed to dominate the WVR arena. The Keldysh system would have forced opponents into the WVR arena after it negated the radar-guided BVR threat. Alternatively an intermittent Keldysh signal could irritate an attacker’s radar long enough for the MFI to get within range for a BVR shot. Then close on the target while it’s busy evading an R-77 salvo and go WVR for the kill.

    in reply to: General Discussion #339986
    SOC
    Participant

    I haven’t the slightest idea, so I’ll forward your question to the Webmaster.

    in reply to: Image size 300kb for all excepted JPG – WHY? #1911087
    SOC
    Participant

    I haven’t the slightest idea, so I’ll forward your question to the Webmaster.

    in reply to: Sukhoi 30 armament? #1787407
    SOC
    Participant

    so do u think introducing some other WVR missile is going to reduce ability of aircraft to carry R-73 follow on? pretty illogical.
    does it mean Mica integration with Mirage-2000 will become difficult due to R-73.

    That’s not what I said. Now you’re taking my statements out of context to fit your argument. If they carry the R-73, they’ll have no problems carrying a follow-on designed to use the same interface. So why waste time finding a weapon that may or may not be more effective than the R-73.

    u havent understood the context of the statement untill this point.

    You haven’t understood weapons acquisition and development procedures.

    in reply to: What if: Su-47 and Mikoyan Project 1.44 #2471010
    SOC
    Participant

    That one labeled Red 57 is pretty damn close to what it would’ve looked like. You can see why it wasn’t a true LO aircraft, but from a frontal aspect it should’ve had a pretty reduced RCS compared to modern 4th generation fighter designs.

    As for my artwork, I’ve got a lot of projects of that nature that have been sidetracked for various reasons 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #340057
    SOC
    Participant

    I’ve been playing guitar for a while now. Most of what I play probably falls into the death metal category, much to the dismay of my neighbors :diablo:

Viewing 15 posts - 1,471 through 1,485 (of 10,347 total)