Quick Google appears to indicate that the Bezu 260 Sight was part of the system to fire the AS.12 Missile from, amongst other types, the Wasp, Wessex, and Nimrod aircraft?
I believe you Tony – serving in the RAF at the time etc…
http://www.helis.com/database/cn/419/
Burnt well….:eek:
Well it’s closer to home than Burma….. oops :diablo:
Thirded by another Pete – what the hell….. it’s sooo nice to see this progress! 😀
http://www.jetprovostheaven.com/jpteams/imgswords.html – team formed by Flt Lt Clive “Bob” Thompson after the Gemini Pair finished.
Also found a thread on FC forum with a couple of other shots:
http://www.fightercontrol.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=53864
Spotted a photo taken at Elstree in 75 which may be of interest:
http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/photo/000651906L.html
I’m curious now – what sort of “Bristol Engine Conversion” was this example then?
but at least a Turbo Porter could land on a carrier…
😮 Would you care to explain what on earth is going on with that last shot of the Skyhawk on the Sub? 😮
Mustang Jumping Jaques called into Cotswold Airport today – photos popped up on their facebook page earlier…
Stunning work 😮
Moved to Brize Norton and still on display looking rather well kept 😉
You might be interested to know that this particular airframe was on display at Farnborough Airshow back in 1970 complete with it’s UK serial of G-AYHS alongside it’s Singapore Air Force ‘314’ codes:
http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/340077
or:
http://www.airliners.net/photo/BAC-167-Strikemaster/1221201/L/
I had not long been at Brawdy when this happened….
I remember sitting at a relative’s house at nearby Tenby and heard the news that one of ours had ‘gone in’. Felt a bit uneasy until I heard the pilot was ok, but what a spectacular end 😮
In brief response to the questions of accuracy amongst press reporting of any incident such as this – well yes it should be reported accurately with any reference photos used showing the actual example where possible rather than another similar one….
My reason for saying that is related to the owner of a certain aircraft with which I have had some involvement. Photos showing this particular one were used in error when reporting an incident involving another, resulting in a few needless enquiries to the owner which had the potential to have a negative result on show bookings for one thing? I don’t doubt that the inaccurate use of ‘stock’ photos was not intended to mislead, but lost earnings as a result of some assuming the wrong identity can be financially damaging as well as hitting the reputation of those owning the wrongly used examples.
Typos and inaccurate wording are another issue altogether of course.