dark light

hunterxf382

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 924 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Falklands we told you so ??? a vintage deterrent #1050628
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    Of course we still have ‘558 and Martin Withers to have another go 😀

    in reply to: Falklands we told you so ??? a vintage deterrent #1050777
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    Running with the humorous ‘scramble’ from the world of preservation – I’m sneaking along to the Museum and prepping Hunter XF382 for combat then… Should be easy as the guns already work, just need a few hundred rounds of 30mm please;) Source the missing pylons and it’ll be ready to receive underwing tanks & stores… Simples 😉

    Neil McCarthy is ready for the northern flank with the JP undergoing the mods to bring it up to Mk52 spec with weaponary – and the current servicing schedule of the soon-to-be seen reappearance of the well known Hunter T7 “G-FFOX” has been hastened to get it ready to have a go 🙂

    Team Viper are gonna get the call to muster crews too – we’ll have a force to be reckoned with taking us back to the 80’s alright…

    Seriously though – I do know that on the Falklands we are far better equipped now than we ever were before. Equipment levels are sufficient – just need the manpower on the ground (a few trooping flights) and get whatever airborne forces we can get there quickly…. Obviously it’s not that simple but the reality is not that far from the above.

    in reply to: No1 TWU Raf Brawdy, Hunters #1051218
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    I couldn’t agree more with increased exposure of Brawdy’s Hunters, in whatever scheme – but then I could be biased having been lucky enough to work on them and still have one to look after 😀
    I would post loads of photos on here but as they’re built up on my personal archives from all sources with copyright uncertain on a few I don’t tread on toes…. My own website covers them all anyway – but would always remove any that the copyright holder didn’t want on there etc. As far as I’m concerned, airing them is done without any profit making or the like, just to share amongst other enthusiasts 😉

    in reply to: No1 TWU Raf Brawdy, Hunters #1052168
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    Er – its in my post above!

    I know but the pic you attached won’t enlarge so I couldn’t tell which serial number it was….. thanks for the updated info on reg’s.

    And to think I pass by the Cosford one without realising it was the same ‘yellow’ example 😉

    PS: I meant ‘find’ as in looking for a photo of it on my pc as I have extensive Brawdy archives to look back at my days there 😀

    in reply to: No1 TWU Raf Brawdy, Hunters #1052307
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    Have you considered either Winston or Clementine (Meteors) in the picture instead of a second Hunter or even a JFACTSU Jet Provost?

    Ooo I like that idea indeed – agreed!!! 😀

    Whilst having a look round I found an online image of the dreaded Dayglo Hunter 😉

    Click Here 😀

    Must admit I would like to find the yellow one too – it’s rather elusive online it seems?

    in reply to: No1 TWU Raf Brawdy, Hunters #1052342
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    I remember them 🙂 never saw the alleged “Dayglo” example though, just the Red and yellow ones… Their role was not something I am familiar with as groundcrew on them – but by the time I arrived in ’78 they were probably just part of the ‘fleet’ and could have been seen with any number of other Hunters on a sortie. The markings didn’t survive much longer after I arrived, mind you neither did many of the Hunters as they were in the middle of replacement by Hawks by then.

    In answer to the original question – for artistic purposes a painting could include any of the other Brawdy Hunters to be honest 😉

    Here’s XF418 at Brawdy whilst still adorned with the Red 🙂

    in reply to: Watched 633 Squadron last night.. #1052939
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    299 was having maintenance at the time IIRC. It did appear for the film “Mosquito Squadron”

    in reply to: Hunter XL578 #1052958
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    PM sent to the copyright holder – replied to and PM sent to you!

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1052997
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    Lower than a Snake’s Belly in a Wagon Rut

    I stumbled across THIS link whilst searching for something else, and I know some of the photos have already appeared on here, but some I haven’t seen before :eek::eek:

    Apologies of it has already been posted – I couldn’t find it and thought it might be worth sharing for the sheer amazement 😉

    in reply to: Watched 633 Squadron last night.. #1053118
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    TW117, the only T3 used in the movie – now in Norway on display at Bodo:

    Pic Link

    Previously on display at Hendon: LINK

    in reply to: Hunter XL578 #1053273
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    Found one shot on my pc but I don’t have the copyright – hence the small version uploaded. I do have contact with the owner if required….

    in reply to: Hunter XL578 #1053295
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    Miss D underwent some repairs including a wing replacement whilst based at Kemble after an incident departing another airfield some years back. For some time the same wing appeared at the back of Delta’s old hangar (the old Red Arrows one)…

    That’s why the removed wing appears with the other ‘bitsa’ parts making an almost complete Hunter in that photo 😉

    Also – Tail Code “87” was XL592 when at Brawdy – I have pics of it, and currently looking for any of XL578?:)

    in reply to: Shoreham Airshow Glider Incident #494177
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    I couldn’t get the AAIB link on their website to open the .pdf file by left clicking it. I right clicked and “saved link as” onto my pc instead. Once downloaded, it opened no problem from my pc. I don’t know why it’s been an issue, but it has happened to several of their report files recently for me.

    in reply to: Shoreham Airshow Glider Incident #494183
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    Anybody read the report ??
    I cannot get it to open from the AAIB website
    http://www.aaib.gov.uk/publications/bulletins/july_2011/swift_s_1__g_izii.cfm

    Hi Baz, I “saved link as” and opened the pdf file from my pc with no problems…

    Makes interesting reading.

    If you’re stuck, I can email you a copy if you want?

    in reply to: Set Square #1056847
    hunterxf382
    Participant

    Moore & Wright are still going – founded in 1906. As suppliers of the tools of choice within the engineering trade, it’s a name I’ve heard of before but not sure if it was during my RAF career or not?

    Found THIS image on a google search – seems to be identical to how you describe yours?

    Quite likely to have been a standard procured tool for the Air Ministry – we tended to have the best available, although that was no guarantee that erks like us could always use them to their best during training;)

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 924 total)