Tuskegee Airman is another goodie,..great Stearman, T-6 and P-51 scenes. Good storyline and with real credibility as based on a true story (obviously).
But yes always is good, esp when John Goodman gets covered in Red dye from the ‘119. Just about wet myself laughing. That guy is a true comic !!!
I have to agree and say Air America is great !!
Also another good flick is “Always” starring John Goodman & Richard Dreyfuss…some great A-26 and Catalina flying as well as a C-119 dropping fire retardant…sure the love story is a bit gooey but the flying scenes are worth the effort !!
But if you love B-36’s & B-47’sget get get get Strategic Air Command !!!
A worthwhile classic !!!
The takeoff scene with the B-36 still leaves me with goosebumps everytime I see it :p
Cheers
Chris
you know, no-one has done a replica Spitfire floatplane.
That would really be one to talk to the lads down at the pub about !!!
(pic from http://www.supermarine-spitfire.co.uk/spitfire_floatplane.htm)
Originally posted by Firebird
The rest of us just seem to be lamenting the fact that the chances of seeing the La-9 in UK skies again is probably nil……
I thought the La-9 was only on loan from OFMC ?
BTW Daz, I went into your Spitfire4T website the other day for the first time.
Really fascinating !!!
Didn’t know there were so many “replicas” around !!!
I sincerely hope you are going to supply us pics with your “Spit coming out” party, Daz !!
hey, this has developed into a little bit of a flame thread of East vs West.
😡
I only started it for appreciation of the beautiful aircraft called an La-9 which I (and many thousands of others here in NZ) are going to have the rare priviledge of witnessing first hand at Eastertime in Wanaka.
Please……..less cr*p and more piccies of the beast !!!
🙂
Chris
Yes, but as Nermal touched on, why bother modifying the Defiant to a great extent, when the Hurricane and Spitfire were doing a fine job already.
Anyway another aircraft I mentioned in an earlier thread was the He-119. Showed a lot of promise and flew really well but was never followed up.
(I’m referring to the single (mid) engined recon aircraft that looks similar to the He-111.)
wow, what superb photos.
You can almost hear the Griffons rumbling…
Thanks, Laharve:)
not very long ago, these were our main strike force……
When flown properly, the Skyhawks were amazing to watch.
I hope this pics helps….all I could find, sorry…
Cheers’
Chris
(from the warbird stealing country of NZ)
yup …’tiz our gain;)
I think the P-40 looks absol briliiant in AVG markings.
We do have some great aircraft here in NZ at present,…but you ppl’s in the other hemisphere have certainly got some great ones still….I mean to say BBMF to name just one, taxi-ing Lanc as well…
Very interesting, Tom.
At the risk of jeering here,…I believe the Whirlwind is every bit as good looking as a Mossie..:p
originally posted by dhfan
I suspect duxfordhawk’s right, by the time they found out it was a dog, all available Merlins had been allocated.
Just quoting William Green’s “Fighters Volume 2” (bible !!)
He says of the Whirlwind…..”for a twin-engined aircraft it was highly manoeuvrable; its handling characteristics were frequently referred to as delightful, and it’s performance at low altitudes was superior to that of contemporary single-engined fighters”
But he does mention the poor maintenance characteristics and nasty Peregrines as well as the landing speed problem.
Apparently, the latter restricted it to only a few airfields with long runways. Still, could have been sorted though.
I reckon if Packard came to the rescue (like for the Mustang)….could have been turned into a great aircraft ’cause it packed a punch and a half with 4 20mm cannons
I agree about the Whirlwind. From what I’ve read, they had a very high landing speed which resulted in a lot of accidents which was probably why they only built 112.
The Defiant, IMO, was initially given the wrong role by the RAF. It excelled as a night-fighter against bombers.