Home Secretary – but has he got the shoes?;);):p

Linc – I think the difficulty of your position on this is where to draw the line at refusing treatment to someone who requires it for anything for which they are responsible.

Most accidents happen in the home and all are the individual’s responsibility. Unless you are blaming the faulty ladder for which the manufacturers’ deny responsibility.

It would be a minefield and totally unworkable.

That sounds very unusual. Is it?

No – I agree. However I do think that there are things for which people should pay, as is common almost everywhere else.

We always agree to disagree about what we have agreed to disagree about, therefore we end up agreeing to agree – even if we have disagreed, we finally do agree – err to agree…….:eek::eek:

You missed the point, Linc. I was reminding you of your thread in which, so far as I recall, we agreed, as did many other members.:)

I think there is a worse problem, whereby someone famous or well known is suspected of a crime or misdemeanour, which is legitimately reported but subsequently the charges are dropped or worse found innocent but the “public” can’t accept the judgement and wholly irrationally regards the individual as “lucky to have got off”. Or whatever the context is.

It is as though a swathe of the public feel cheated of their salacious yearning for scandal.

Nor me.