dark light

Sky High

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,146 through 2,160 (of 7,143 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IL2 Cliffs of Dover Trailer #1085186
    Sky High
    Participant

    Thanks – that seems to concur with what I’ve been hearing – so just in time for Christmas, perhaps!!:)

    in reply to: General Discussion #319469
    Sky High
    Participant

    I think the truth was that Patricia Routledge was an acclaimed and successful actress well before the sitcom and she felt she had done enough of it and simply wished to continue her diverse career before getting stuck in a rut. Like others of its genre I thought it was very predictable with odd moments of fun.

    I echo the comments about Waiting for God – brilliant!

    Last of the Summer Wine left me cold. I never saw anything funny in it – the characters were simply caricatures.

    in reply to: Dad's Army! #1859229
    Sky High
    Participant

    I think the truth was that Patricia Routledge was an acclaimed and successful actress well before the sitcom and she felt she had done enough of it and simply wished to continue her diverse career before getting stuck in a rut. Like others of its genre I thought it was very predictable with odd moments of fun.

    I echo the comments about Waiting for God – brilliant!

    Last of the Summer Wine left me cold. I never saw anything funny in it – the characters were simply caricatures.

    in reply to: IL2 Cliffs of Dover Trailer #1085322
    Sky High
    Participant

    Interesting that the reviews of the sim in the professional press when it was released, have been very poor. On the basis of these previews it was on my shopping list, but I am waiting to see if it is refined.

    Check in the Flight Sim forum for more news.

    in reply to: General Discussion #319553
    Sky High
    Participant

    “Gents, We are way off track here, the question I posted was simple,”

    This doesn’t seem to have made much progress overnight….I refer you to my first post in the thread…No, is the simple answer to the question.

    in reply to: N.H.S. #1859259
    Sky High
    Participant

    “Gents, We are way off track here, the question I posted was simple,”

    This doesn’t seem to have made much progress overnight….I refer you to my first post in the thread…No, is the simple answer to the question.

    in reply to: Nostalgia #1859492
    Sky High
    Participant

    Now you have come up with something for which I do feel nostalgia – i.e. I want it back!!

    in reply to: General Discussion #319873
    Sky High
    Participant

    Now you have come up with something for which I do feel nostalgia – i.e. I want it back!!

    in reply to: General Discussion #319875
    Sky High
    Participant

    We have only gone off-track because your question is too simplistic. And as many of us have pointed out you cannot separate injuries into those for which the individual is responsible and the rest. I like your phrase “inconvenience to NHS staff”.:rolleyes: They are there to treat ill and injured people however inconvenienced they might feel!! In fact if they do feel inconvenienced they are in the wrong job.

    Sorry, Linc, you will not drag us away from the can of worms you have opened.:)

    in reply to: N.H.S. #1859494
    Sky High
    Participant

    We have only gone off-track because your question is too simplistic. And as many of us have pointed out you cannot separate injuries into those for which the individual is responsible and the rest. I like your phrase “inconvenience to NHS staff”.:rolleyes: They are there to treat ill and injured people however inconvenienced they might feel!! In fact if they do feel inconvenienced they are in the wrong job.

    Sorry, Linc, you will not drag us away from the can of worms you have opened.:)

    in reply to: N.H.S. #1859597
    Sky High
    Participant

    I refer you to Arthur’s post above.

    in reply to: General Discussion #320074
    Sky High
    Participant

    I refer you to Arthur’s post above.

    in reply to: General Discussion #320119
    Sky High
    Participant

    I hope I’m not being silly, but rational. Yes, I do know what you are trying to say, but it wouldn’t work. Which is the question you asked us. And my answer, again, is no.

    in reply to: N.H.S. #1859632
    Sky High
    Participant

    I hope I’m not being silly, but rational. Yes, I do know what you are trying to say, but it wouldn’t work. Which is the question you asked us. And my answer, again, is no.

    in reply to: Justice #1859637
    Sky High
    Participant

    Home Secretary – but has he got the shoes?;);):p

Viewing 15 posts - 2,146 through 2,160 (of 7,143 total)