I think it’s absolutely marvellous, Twin Otter. I misssed it yesterday for some reason and certainly would have posted a response had I seen it. I wonder how many other aviation museums know of Empedia or any other similar websites. Food for thought for a few, I would imagine, and I’m sure it will boost your attendances this year.
Thank you for bumping it.

Fantastic, Bomberflight!!:D I am very pleased you kept your promise. Thank you.

Having quoted my post, you seem to have another good old rant about why it’s all wrong and who’s to blame, but I asked people how they would deal with the problem. So far no one has responded.

It is good and proper to criticise and complain but I think that in doing so we also need to have some idea of how the problem shouild be solved.

Ah, ha! That’s for me to know and you to guess at!;) How’s the roof-rack?

Yup, it is the market. And the only “right” price is the price something can sell for, be it a banana, a car, a house or a movie star.

All of you, that’s why I said “you all”.

You will find that in order to build the 7,000 to 10,000 required they have to build both on land and out at sea. Like you they do not necessarily offend me aesthetically, but their offence is in their inability to produce electricity, so they are little more than staggeringly expensive installation artworks.

And so having made your points with great strength, what would would you all do? I know it’s difficult to exclude politics, but just taking the amounts of money involved, how do we reach a point where we are not continuously borrowing more than we earn, or at least, reducing the deficit to a point at which the interest ceases to accumulate so that we can at least service the debt, comfortably.