Yes – I wonder……:(

“Also, let’s not play into the hands of these protesters and tar all people who share their faith with the same brush”

That is a very important point. Extremists prevail because of the publicity they get. If only the media could agree to play down or virtually ignore their activities. A vain hope because the media thrives on news and the more scandalous the event the better.

This is not of the most enlightening threads on this forum…….:(

Yes, in essence, I believe in the “charity begins at home” approach. I am not opposed to overseas aid per se, but I am opposed to indiscriminate and arguably worthless overseas aid, where the money could be better spent at home.

Yes, I would accept that, in principle. No benefit after the second child and a reduced benefit for the second. And for the rest, much is covered by IDS’ proposed reforms, which should be applauded. Beveridge would be proud of him.

You are right and the targets were openly committed to by our previous Prime Minister and his predecessor. Education, education, education…I think not!

I agree with your first and second paragraphs but do not follow the link you make in your third.

In terms of money available I would massively reduce the overseas aid budget to put that money at the disposal of our needs at home. And, more contentiously, or as contentiously perhaps, stop any further payments to the EU until the accounts are signed off and expenditure reduced. A total of £10 billion or so. That would help a few towards serious degrees in further education.