dark light

Sky High

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,851 through 5,865 (of 7,143 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1128717
    Sky High
    Participant

    As for the first comment you are entitled to your opinion. Cleary hundreds of thousands of people are excited by the Vulcan as they were by Concorde, for example. As for your other comments your perception of the saga is probably about right.

    in reply to: RAF Netheravon #1128763
    Sky High
    Participant

    What a coincidence! I am tre-reading First Light after a very long interval and have just reached Geoff Wellum’s final cross country exercise when he missed Netheravon in poor visibility and landed at Upavon. As it turned out most APOs made the same mistake in training!

    in reply to: General Discussion #328735
    Sky High
    Participant

    That’s intriguing and just so that I understand your good news. Under certain circumstances the tax payer ( that’s nearly all of us ) pays a percentage of compensation to a bankrupt’s creditors?

    in reply to: What Made You Smile Today? (Part 2) #1907433
    Sky High
    Participant

    That’s intriguing and just so that I understand your good news. Under certain circumstances the tax payer ( that’s nearly all of us ) pays a percentage of compensation to a bankrupt’s creditors?

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1128932
    Sky High
    Participant

    The key difference being, of course, that in a country where people melt at the image of a bent puppy, the method works. It does not at the thought of a big tin triangle being grounded.

    No, Kev and others are right. The methods are wrong and counter-productive, but no one seems to have the solution, other than to hope another big benefactor will be moved to save the day – yet again.

    in reply to: Junkers 88 & The "Battle of Graveney Marshes" #1129361
    Sky High
    Participant

    I don’t think it was on the mudflats was it? I think it made a “gentle” crash landing on the grassy marshes and remained well exposed despite some slight sinkage into the marshy grass. If it had crashed on the mudflats it would have been swallowed into the mud and then been covered by the incoming tide, leaving little for immediate recovery.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain BBC2 last night #1129474
    Sky High
    Participant

    Fair enough – I take your point.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain BBC2 last night #1129503
    Sky High
    Participant

    Maybe, but it certainly won’t stop the debate which has been raging for decades…………;) And in any case they were, together with the Hurricane, the three aircraft involved in fighting each other during the Summer of 1940. So, different or not, they were tasked to fight each other so comparisons are inevitable.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain BBC2 last night #1129519
    Sky High
    Participant

    But that’s a debate that goes round and round and round. In any case he was drawing conclusions from a number of 1st hand sources, not they form an objective assessment of the pros and cons – only how the pilots recall what happened to them.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1129532
    Sky High
    Participant

    Isn’t the problem that unlike many other charities the Vulcan needs periodic large shots in the arm to avoid cessation. Other charities continue to support whom or whatever it is with greater or lesser funding.

    Unless you genuinely do not want to see her fly anymore it seems sad to withhold your cash because you disagree with the methods. Although it is, of course, your right to choose. I too have shelled out rather a lot but will continue to help, in a smaller way than before as funds are tighter these days, in the hope she might make it through at least another season or two. But I am not optimistic, I have to say.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1129549
    Sky High
    Participant

    Whilst agreeing with you about the RBL I would disagree fundamentally about the RSPCA. Over the years many of their ads have been aggressive and designed to engender guilt.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1129685
    Sky High
    Participant

    I wouldn’t disagree with that – not dissimilar to the “hard sell” in normal trading. One instinctively turns away from that approach.

    in reply to: Junkers 88 & The "Battle of Graveney Marshes" #1129696
    Sky High
    Participant

    It links with this old thread rather neatly…………

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=95156&highlight=graveney+marshes

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1129708
    Sky High
    Participant

    TwinOtter –

    IMHO the fairest assessment would be to say that some charities raise some income from donations!

    Very fair, indeed.:)

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1129712
    Sky High
    Participant

    It is none of the three. It is about choosing what we all do with our money and how we judger the value of how we spend it.

Viewing 15 posts - 5,851 through 5,865 (of 7,143 total)