dark light

Sky High

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,081 through 7,095 (of 7,143 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What Type Of Aircraft Did You First Fly In? #1153158
    Sky High
    Participant

    Dragon Rapide – London Airport ( as was ) circa 1949/1950 aged 5 or 6, with my father. Second flight two years later with my younger brother and father and this time the long flight downriver to Tower Bridge and back.

    in reply to: Combat Flight Simulator 3: A New Era #220718
    Sky High
    Participant

    It rather depends on how old your grandson is.

    There is no doubt that the IL2 series ( IL2 Sturmovik, Forgotten Battles & Pacific Fighters) stands head and shoulders above all others for authenticity. But that authenticity is bought at the cost of a very steep learning curve that requires a bit of dedication to master.

    Moggy

    He is nearly 7 and has been “flying” FSX for well over a year. If the IL2 series is too demanding is there an alternative – preferably WW2?

    in reply to: Combat Flight Simulator 3: A New Era #220720
    Sky High
    Participant

    None of the above really helps me to decide what to buy for my grandson. Can someone offer some objective advice on combat simulation to run on a PC?:)

    in reply to: An end to flying at Duxford? #1154516
    Sky High
    Participant

    Maybe I should have set “get your specs on” – the part you failed to include in the quote was rather small – “That will be the view of some tossers in the local council…” and my erroneous spelling of aeroplane was explained a couple of posts later.
    Maybe you missed that in your rush to chastise me?

    And just for the record it’s not my view. I fully appreciate the role of museums, maybe why I am a volunteer at Duxford.
    I also have a grasp of the whole Global Warming argument, having read quite a bit on the topic. So, if it’s OK with you, I’ll devote the time reading something new…

    I am suitably rebuked!! And feel free to read as the mood takes you.:o

    in reply to: ROC Recognition Cards #1154583
    Sky High
    Participant

    I’ve got a few I can scan on the PC and post, if everyone else does the same we should all end up with loads :D:D:D:D:D

    Good grief, are there that many out there….?:eek:

    in reply to: James May And Spitfire #1154588
    Sky High
    Participant

    Thank you, Bob and Martyn. 🙂

    in reply to: James May And Spitfire #1154684
    Sky High
    Participant

    James May clearly realised that rather than being another middle aged bloke (like me) grumbling into his real ale that the ‘kids just don’t get it’ he’d do something about it, reach out and try to explain. Furthermore, he’d do it on national television. Surely this is a GOOD THING.

    If only one kid asks mum or dad ‘What’s a Spitfire? Why is it famous?’ then it’s worthwhile (assuming they get sensible answers..)

    I’m another who built them 1/72 when little, and build them full-size now (as well as 1/72 every now and then) – that’s what Airfix (and Matchbox, etc, but mainly Airfix) did for me, and, indirectly, for our heritage. Sorry to sound so grand about it, and being British we don’t like that kind of talk, but it is an elephant-in-the-room fact.

    Regarding the gay thing – Mr May is one of those blokes who occasionally forgets to apply the ‘grown-up, and on telly’ filter. Its not big, and not clever – but hey, it’s also nothing major. It was mildly offensive to some, yes, but no-one died. And you should hear what TV personalities say about redheads to get a laugh. My Missus has to deal with that pretty much every day.

    Good programme!

    I like this post, Beermat and I totally agree with you – I just wish I had seen the programme. I like May and his programmes. He really is an enthusiast and wants to share it, he is nicely non-PC but inoffensive, except to the ultra-sensitive, although clear in his opinions. Rather him than many other TV presenters who grace our screens weekly. 😀

    in reply to: An end to flying at Duxford? #1154718
    Sky High
    Participant

    Get a sense of humour……….:rolleyes:

    Well actually, I have or so my friends tell me, so I apologise for missing the “joke” in your post.:p

    in reply to: ROC Recognition Cards #1154723
    Sky High
    Participant

    :diablo: That’s him for the high jump then!!

    I saw the cards on Tuesday – they have been taken off sale and are sat on the Shop Managers desk waiting for your call – sorry that she’s not working today!

    Sounds like it! I appreciate your help. I am getting quite excited – it is years since I have seen any and I have already been taken back to the mid-fifties gazing skywards with my father ” doing the recce cards”.

    in reply to: ROC Recognition Cards #1154737
    Sky High
    Participant

    Twin Otter

    I have spoken to the shop and the Curator who tells me that Roz Blackmore is she who must be obeyed and she will be in the shop on Monday, so I will phone her then to see what she can arrange. I’ll let you know when it reaches a happy conclusion.:)

    in reply to: ROC Recognition Cards #1154739
    Sky High
    Participant

    Sky High,

    I spoke with the Shop Manager this morning and she still has 400 -500 ROC Profiles in stock – but these are mainly with aircraft photographs on and cost a ‘pocket money price’.

    There was a few of the silhouette style cards amongst them as shown in G-ASEA’s post and I have asked the Shop Manager to put these on one side to await your call. 🙂

    Just seen this. Many thanks, Twin Otter. I have just phoned but the line is engaged and I will keep trying.

    Thanks again.:D

    in reply to: General Discussion #298699
    Sky High
    Participant

    Hearing more depressing rubbish from the EU summit about Lisbon and Copenhagen. The only news to lift the spirit slightly was that the arch-greaser Blair might be out of the running for President. Every cloud has a silver lining…….:mad:

    in reply to: What made you (want to) Swear Today? #1889223
    Sky High
    Participant

    Hearing more depressing rubbish from the EU summit about Lisbon and Copenhagen. The only news to lift the spirit slightly was that the arch-greaser Blair might be out of the running for President. Every cloud has a silver lining…….:mad:

    in reply to: An end to flying at Duxford? #1154984
    Sky High
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Bob;1478497]Houses are more important than a few dusty old airplanes. People have to live somewhere and the flying airoplanes for pleasure is all helping to destroy the planet with global warming.

    What a fatuously naive contribution. The real arguments are about the need for housing and its planning. Our population is growing through immigration not through indiginent family growth. And anyone still with an unblinkered objective view of the MMGW debate can see that the scientific basis for it is slender if not unjustified. And “a few dusty airoplanes(sic)” will have no affect whatosoever in destroying the planet. Read some books old chum and you might learn something.

    in reply to: General Discussion #299256
    Sky High
    Participant

    “I’m afraid I, for one, cannot agree.

    It is clearly of the right, however hard you may wish it were otherwise.

    That aside, do you think that Mr Griffin would agree with your description of his party as “national socialist” given his claim about being loathed by Nazis?”

    We will just have to agree to disagree, Grey Area. As to your second point Naziism was a just one form of national socialism as was Franco’s and Mussolini’s.

Viewing 15 posts - 7,081 through 7,095 (of 7,143 total)