dark light

Scouse

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 725 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Luftwaffe Raid Liverpool 1940 #1138019
    Scouse
    Participant

    No hesitation in bringing this back, but with a question.

    Does anyone know numbers of wounded and numbers trapped in the November 1940 bombing of the BSA Birmingham works? Some discussion here: http://airminded.org/2010/11/19/tuesday-19-november-1940/ and relating to the Liverpool Blitz.

    I’ll dig up my dad’s diaries from the attic. He spent most of the war in Birmingham where he was in the Home Guard, and he also kept a diary for over 60 years – more Mr Pooter than Samuel Pepys, but at least it’s contemporary material.

    in reply to: Birmingham Airport Closed – CRASH #520738
    Scouse
    Participant

    You’ve got to smile a bit at the Daily Telegraph website report this morning, or failing that just give up!
    Alongside the main story is a panel of ‘related articles’ – which include such gems as the Qantas engine incident at Singapore and a history of Cuban air crashes.
    Just shows the perils of allowing a computer to take over editorial decisions, in this case by automatically lumping in everything with the appropriate key words.

    in reply to: Birmingham Airport Closed – CRASH #520912
    Scouse
    Participant
    in reply to: Fieseler Fi 156 "Storch" #1143058
    Scouse
    Participant

    Your best starting point would be here: http://www.preservedaxisaircraft.com/ and then navigate to the Fi 156 list via the German button on the left.
    And then go to this: http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=101327&highlight=Storch

    in reply to: What SLR would you recommend? #530077
    Scouse
    Participant

    A lot depends on your budget, as you say, but in general you can’t go too far wrong with the offerings from Nikon or Canon.
    People can get hung up on the detailed specifications, but you should always remember that it’s the photographer that makes a good and memorable picture. But you know that anyway, I’m sure!
    I’ve always reckoned that there’s a lot of sound advice on this site. He’s obviously a Nikon man, and Canon users may beg to differ, but it’s still worth a browse.

    http://www.kenrockwell.com/

    in reply to: Where's this Hurricane factory? #1148403
    Scouse
    Participant

    does it not resemble something more like a Whitley/Stirling crossbreed?

    Definitely meant to be a Stirling, but it does have the nose-down ‘sit’ of a Whitley and those cowlings look far more like an early Whitley’s Armstrong-Siddeley Tigers than a Stirling’s Hercules. I can see what contrailjj is getting at.

    Scouse
    Participant

    There used to be a B-26 fuselage section in the scrapyard near Warrington back in the 70s – I assume it’s long lost now. Anyone know for sure?

    in reply to: Engine Remanufacture #1153222
    Scouse
    Participant

    As near as dammit plus/minus a tenth of a thou for the main bearing.

    in reply to: Bristol Type 138 A #1155317
    Scouse
    Participant

    That would be the first of the Fairey Long-range Monoplanes, J9479, crashed near Tunis.

    in reply to: Engine Remanufacture #1156189
    Scouse
    Participant

    I understand that tolerances on the crank were to five decimal points!!!

    Me109G4, are you sure? Five decimal points on a millimetre is a hundredth of a micron, which is seriously tiny, probably considerably less than the hills and dales left after precision grinding. Even if you take your starting point as a metre, it’s still 10 microns, about the size of a human red blood cell, or about half a thou for those still thinking Imperial.

    in reply to: Piston Airliners Converted to Turbine Power #1156799
    Scouse
    Participant

    My Constellation book (M J Hardy, David and Charles, 1972) has it that Lockheed wanted to go ahead with a turbine-powered L-1449 in 1953/4 but were held up by delays in the PT2F engine, a civil version of the T-34.
    A number of alternatives were looked at including the Tyne and Bristol Orion from the UK and civil versions of the T-52 and the T-56.
    The two British engines were in their early stages and the T52 never saw production, so it came down to the T-56, or more accurately the civil 501.
    By this time the 501-powered Electra was taking shape and the jets were coming. Lockheed pulled the plug on the turbine Constellation in early 1955 and instead went ahead with the piston-powered L-1649, which had the new wing originally designed for the L-1449.
    Strictly-speaking we’ve drifted off-topic here: the L-1449 was a turbine version of a Constellation, but it was not a conversion of an existing airframe.
    Boeing did re-engine a few C-97s, btw, as the YC-97J with T-34s.
    As far as later conversions are concerned, like the Basler DC-3, another driving factor is the more limited availability of avgas in remote areas as opposed to jet fuel.

    in reply to: Piston Airliners Converted to Turbine Power #1157721
    Scouse
    Participant

    Fuel burn and conversion costs as suggested, plus the fact that to make the best use of turbine power, an airliner needs to fly high, ruling out unpressurised types such as Dakotas.
    I’ve always felt that a turboprop Constellation might just have been a goer, but as a new-build rather than a conversion. It would have needed the right engine at the right time and the necessary investment in the mid-1950s, though, at a time when Lockheed’s thoughts on big turboprops were on the C-130 and, a little bit later, the Electra.
    Don’t forget, too, that the Boeing 367-80 was flying by then and Lockheed could possibly see the writing on the wall for propeller-engined long-haulers.

    in reply to: A Spitfire extracted from the mud – Normandy #1158717
    Scouse
    Participant

    Bit of thread drift I know, but can someone with good colloquial French (as opposed to my ancient O-level!) tell me why the Ouest-France report refers to the distance the plane was dislodged by the tide in miles rather than kilometres? Yet the water depth is given in metres.

    in reply to: W.W.II aircrew still flying? #1088865
    Scouse
    Participant

    Going ever slightly off-topic, who was the last active pilot from the previous world war?
    Air Commodore Harold ‘Daddy’ Probyn flew a BE2C with 34 Squadron RFC and was still flying until days before his death in 1984. But was he the last of his breed?

    in reply to: FACT or FICTION: "Amiens Raid: Secrets Revealed" #1089369
    Scouse
    Participant

    After all,they were the architects of the industrialisation of slaughter.

    Those who know what happened in the Soviet Union in the 1930s may want to dispute whether this dubious honour really belongs to the Germans, but in the scheme of all-out war disposing of 200 prisoners is, unfortunately, neither here nor there.

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 725 total)