dark light

Scouse

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 725 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Whatever happened to civil STOL? #549251
    Scouse
    Participant

    If the airline demand had really been there, then we would have seen STOL being adopted on a large scale. The 54-seat Dash 7 probably came nearest to true STOL, but production ended 19 years ago with just over 100 built.
    Wherever you site an airport, be it somewhere like London City or Liverpool (five minutes from my house), it’s going to be in the wrong place for many if not most people. The samed applies to the main line railway stations.
    I recall all sorts of wierd and wonderful VTOL (not STOL) offerings from Hawker Siddeley in the 1970s which were never the same again after the oil crisis, and the Wilson government of the day did the aircraft industry a (rare) favour by pulling the plug on them, IMHO.

    William

    in reply to: slides #456668
    Scouse
    Participant

    Tom,

    It might be a statement of the obvious, but a great many inexpensive flat bed scanners have slide adapters. They might not be up to the quality of a dedicated professional film scanner, but for images to be posted on the web and forums like this they are easily good enough.
    As an example, the attached picture (from the 1968 Biggin Hill air fair) was scanned in on an Epson 2480 that cost me about £60 a couple of years back. The original image of about 222kb has been reduced to 36kb or so for posting, and I’ve retiouched most of the dust out, but otherwise it’s straight out of the box, so to speak.
    Looks like they’re going for £40 or so on eBay now.
    If you want a full-resolution copy of the scane let me know in a PM.

    William

    in reply to: photo editing #456789
    Scouse
    Participant

    Depends on how much editing you want to do. The image organising programmes discussed in an earlier thread nearly all have some basic editing function, but if you want to go further then GIMP that RobAnt has suggested is one of the best free ones around.
    I’ve had http://www.photofiltre.com suggested to me s a pretty good one too, but I’ve got no first-hand experience to go on.
    A full-feature image programme like Photoshop CS2, which I have access to, can be pretty daunting to a home user, to say nothing of expensive! However, I feel very comfortable with Photoshop Elements, which is £69 in its latest version, and you can download a free trial from the Adobe website to have a play around with.
    Try looking for Photoshop Elements in eBay and there seem to to be plenty of legitimate copies available for considerably less than the official price. I’d go for any version from Elements 3 onwards, as these have the incredibly useful spot healing tool for getting rid of blemishes from, particularly, scans.

    William

    in reply to: The oldest AIRWORTHY jet???? #1277197
    Scouse
    Participant

    It’s an EKW C-3605 – built during WWII and used in a similar role to the Battle.
    Re-engined to Lycoming T-53 turbo prop power for target tugging in the late 1960’s.

    I really must go to bed…a vision of a turboprop Battle has just swum in front of my eyes:cool:

    William

    in reply to: unusual air combat encounters #1277198
    Scouse
    Participant

    When Ezer Weizman used his Spitfire as a personal hack in the Six Day War in 1967, was the Spitfire equipped for combat?
    Obviously it never happened, but Spitfire vs MiG-21 would have been, er, interesting. Certainly if it had happened, Weizman was the kind of guy who’d have gone down fighting to the end.

    William

    in reply to: unusual air combat encounters #1277941
    Scouse
    Participant

    Gloster Meteor(s) versus Fieseler Storch in the final days of World War 2. Storch pilot bottled out (so would I!), landed in a field and legged it, thus depriving the Meteors of a proper air to air ‘kill’.

    William

    in reply to: unidentified turks #1279459
    Scouse
    Participant

    My last amendment crossed with John’s posting. I reckon he’s cracked it.

    http://www.vinar.cz/mitte/s31.htm

    William

    in reply to: unidentified turks #1279466
    Scouse
    Participant

    Are you sure it’s a roundel? To me the aeroplane in the first photo seems to have the Czech civil register “OK” on the fuselage and on the bottom of the wing.

    I still think it’s a roundel, although I’m quite open to being convinced otherwise and the letters on the fuselage could well be OK.
    The braced horizontal tailplane set quite high on the fuselage and the fairly wide-chord cabane struts should be a help in identifying it. The wheels seem to be set well forward, which is what sent me off looking at later model SPADs.
    There seems to be some sort of marking on the fin and rudder. Difficult to say if it’s a tricoloured flash or not, though.
    I had at first thought the second plane was a monoplane of Fokker-type layout, but on closer inspection you can see an interplane strut far left, and come to think of it the elevated group on the right of the engine have to be sitting on something. Silly me.

    (Change added later) Definitely not a Letov S19. Have a look at this:

    http://www.hajnalkax.host.sk/letectvo/csa/galeria_csa.htm#

    Wrong interplane struts, slab-sided fuselage, wrong fin and rudder, etc etc

    William

    in reply to: unidentified turks #1280515
    Scouse
    Participant

    Look closely at the roundel under the wing of the biplane, and you can see that the outer ring appears darkest. As nearly all film then had blue-sensitive orthochromatic emulsions which endered reds un-naturally dark, this suggests to me that it is probably French as well as the monoplane.
    Plenty of things it almost looks like. It did cross my mind for a moment it might be a Gloster Gamecock, but see above. Besides, the exhaust stubs and the fin and rudder outline are wrong for this.
    It’s not a late model Bleriot/SPAD as these had single interplane struts. Hmmm….puzzled.

    William

    in reply to: Fuji Finepix S7000 #457013
    Scouse
    Participant

    I’ve already got a Fuji 2800Z as the backup, so I reckon I can’t be running a stable of three cameras!
    The new one’s a Fuji S9600 – more of an incremental advance on the S7000than a quantum leap. but they’re as low as £255 on Amazon at the moment, and the first signs are that it’s a useful advance, particularly with its ability to track a moving object and all-round faster responses.

    The Olympus, which I hadn’t clocked, looks impressive from its spec. I’m a long standing Olympus loyalist, and I’m still wrestling with myself over whether to get the shutter fixed on the trusty OM-2 I’ve had for 20-odd years. Decisons, decisions….

    William

    in reply to: TSR2s anywhere? #2512622
    Scouse
    Participant

    Did any names for the bird ever surface?

    There was a thread on this some time last year. Eagle seemed to have been the most likely, as the RAF was quite fond of birds of prey for naming its fast jets at the time.
    The ordered-then-cancelled F-111s were pencilled in as Merlins, apparently, and the aborted supersonic VTOL P1154 would have been the Harrier.
    The Harrier name, obviously, was reallocated to the P1127 (RAF), and the Merlin name is now attached to a helicopter…

    William

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1297844
    Scouse
    Participant

    When I worked at Filton in the early 1970s, the veterans all talked in awestruck tones about a legendary beat-up from a Folland Midge. Tales like this tend to grow in the telling, I know, but the way it was put to me had it that the Midge flew down each and every aisle between the factory sheds below rooftop level.
    I imagine this would have happened some time in the 1950s. Chances of a photograph are more or less non-existent, but does anyone know more about this?

    William

    in reply to: General Discussion #326571
    Scouse
    Participant

    Good job Flares didn’t come in til the 70’s!! 😀

    Even a more modern bike and flares don’t mix. On a 1970s BMW flat twin it was possible to get a trouser leg hooked over the carburetter top preventing a foot from touching the ground, resulting in the bike toppling over.
    Don’t ask me how I know this….:D

    William

    in reply to: Not many of these around #1936320
    Scouse
    Participant

    Good job Flares didn’t come in til the 70’s!! 😀

    Even a more modern bike and flares don’t mix. On a 1970s BMW flat twin it was possible to get a trouser leg hooked over the carburetter top preventing a foot from touching the ground, resulting in the bike toppling over.
    Don’t ask me how I know this….:D

    William

    in reply to: General Discussion #326572
    Scouse
    Participant

    ….. Did any other aero manufacturers produce other automotive thingy wotsits

    Plenty on the engines side…Rolls-Royce, BMW and Daimler-Benz to name but some.
    Not so sure about airframes. I know Austin built a few fighters in the Great war, and Fiat means as much in aviation as it does on the road. Plus, of course, the many British motor makers like Rootes Group who turned themselves into plane makers in the Second World war – think of all those Speke-built Blenheims and Halifaxes.
    The early French aviator Gabriel Voisin was as much a car man as a planes man. He was just about the last survivor of the really early days of powered flying (ie pre-1908) and in the 1970s he was asked whether he would rather be driving one of his cars or a modern one. He reply was along the lines of ‘don’t be silly – a Renault 5 is better than anything I ever made.’
    I’m sure I’ve left a few obvious names out, but you get the general idea.

    William

Viewing 15 posts - 541 through 555 (of 725 total)