Why is this qualified as being stealth?
Also more a mustache than a canard. Could be retractable.

Lol the ink isn’t even dried on the document of understanding to build a stealth aircraft and we already have people questioning the stealth of said currently non existent aircraft.

Longer range (+150 nm combat radius). Internal carriage of anti-ship/anti-radiation missiles. E-2 support.

With the Delta Flight Path, carrier landings have been greatly simplified as well.

F-35’s New Landing Technology May Simplify Carrier Operations

But the better technology has also made SVTOL landings and takeoff simpler

sure it can MoonCat,

it will probably be more or less, stealth airframe with MiG-35 guts. Similar to how Turkish TFX will end up being a stealth airframe with EF Typhoid Guts

the UAE peeps need something stealth to penetrate Iran’s defenses and F-35 seems to be off the table (but why they don’t want the Pak-fa or Chinese lockmart clones is beyond me).
So this route is the lowest risk

at least we know if MiG is designing it, it won’t look hyperboring like most of the 5th gen aircraft out there

I am assuming that Iran will buy Pak Fa’s eventually. Or maybe FC 31’s. I just don’t see how Russia or China can get away with arming both sides.

Can you more clearly explain why you think it’s stupid ?

It’s the only one with TVC so by default..

No i don’t. As usual you are trying to push your misunderstanding as fact. In this case it is even worse because anyone who can speak/listen English properly can see that you are wrong. The video even have caption. If you can’t understand to what he said then at least turn it on.

Alright, open the video on full screen, turn on the caption. Between 5:56 and 6:25 , he literally said F-15 with wing tank dominate clean Su-30. No one sneak anything in. It is just you either having very poor English ( which is acceptable, but turn on the caption next time) or trying to troll.

I talked about fuel tank and pilots because that is literally what he talked about in the video. You are just embarrassing yourself now

Alright, open the video on full screen, turn on the caption. Between 5:56 and 6:25 , he literally said F-15 with wing tank dominate clean Su-30.

I said that the col was comparing the su 30 to the Raptor. You replied by making it look like, to someone who didn’t watch the video, that I posted the wrong video or something because you made it look like the F 15 vs the su 30 was the central topic of the video. When clearly it wasn’t.

The subsequent obscurantism that the col went on to say about fuel tanks, F 15’s, pilots and tactics does not take away the main point and reason why I posted the video. Which is, that the USAF col said that an su 30 can do anything that a Raptor can do at an airshow. (Indian pilot in a su 30. Not Russian pilot in an su 35)

Please…… His entire premise is wrong from the start. The F-22 may have issues with software upgrades, premature fatigue stress on tails, and inlet ramp damage, but people seem to forget that early blocks weren’t even supposed to be serving as combat coded aircraft in 2017. The commonly repeated myth that F-22 production was discontinued due to: “design faults”, “too expensive” are repeated on this forum often without any supporting documentation or reports. The last proposed production block had a procurement cost below 150 million in TY$.

Those comments just don’t correspond with the actual reasons stated by Gates, JCS, or Congress. The F-22 was cut, quite simply because Gates prioritized weapons that could be used in Iraq and Afghanistan, Congress and the President sustained him. Gates stated that 187 F-22’s would suffice to meet any threat then foreseen (and history has shown his foresight to be flawed).

Agree to disagree then.

I think the reason that Gates gave is the BS answer and the expense of the aircraft is the truth. You think the exact opposite.