dark light

bms44

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 309 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The reluctant Sea Hawks….. #1212810
    bms44
    Participant

    You’ve done it again David ! Excellent photos ; you mentioned a book could be a possibility : looks like you could have the makings of several books with your fantastic library, with many eager buyers queuing up to get a slice of history and nostalgia.(I know I would be, certainly!) Regards, Brian S. 🙂

    in reply to: Lightning pilot- Ian Black #1221613
    bms44
    Participant

    As far as I know he flies for an airline of some description and as Lindy’s Lad rightly points out he is now back current on the Lightnings at Thunder City in SA.

    John.

    ….it’s a hard life, but somebody’s gotta do it!…. 😉

    in reply to: Cold War intercepts #1229813
    bms44
    Participant

    This thread brings to mind the time when a Bear arrived for an airshow in the UK some few years back, great play was made of the escort of the RAF fighters who met and escorted the aircraft to the display base : when interviewed by the usual clueless tv pundit and asked some inane question as to how he found us, the Russian pilot intimated casually (and probably with a just a hint of surprise at the enquiry, that they had been coming over (to Britain) for years. (presumably he had little need of a Michelin map) 😉

    in reply to: A sad loss to the world of Historic Aviation enthusiasts #1230490
    bms44
    Participant

    Hi all, If you had seen the bedrooms you wouldnt want to stay there either. Stayed a couple of times when working at HFL. Pulled plug from sink and everything in sink ended up in the bath !!! very pleasent !!!!

    Steve

    Better than pulling the plug from the bath and everything ending up in the sink…..seems to be a lot of slanderous (or is it libelous?) stuff floating about this thread… :diablo:… but thanks for the heads-up guys.

    in reply to: Ugliest Warplane #1230498
    bms44
    Participant

    Well there’s two of us at least..

    ….three of us,thank you….might have to rethink my avatar…again 😉

    in reply to: 29 Squadron Mosquito? #1230651
    bms44
    Participant

    S..s…snap ! Northeagle…you w..w…win! :rolleyes:

    in reply to: 29 Squadron Mosquito? #1230654
    bms44
    Participant

    Knew I’d seen that badge somewhere!

    Mosquito at War, pg 49, FBVI of 613 Sqn.

    It says that it was in that a/c that Gen Browning, GOC British Airborne Corps was flown into Normandy in July 44.

    🙂

    Would say you’ve got it Jimbo : might even be General ‘Boy’ Browning in the photo. Try this link for confirmation.

    http://www.paradata.org.uk/media/509?mediaSection=Photos

    Denis, your photo might be more valuable than you thought!

    in reply to: 29 Squadron Mosquito? #1230724
    bms44
    Participant

    Both ties wrong colour for RAF : definitely army types, I’d say. 😉

    in reply to: 29 Squadron Mosquito? #1230742
    bms44
    Participant

    ‘The other bloke’…looks like an army officer to me.

    Side arm, a hint of pips on the epaulet, crisp collar and tie etc.

    If the beret badge is the same on both parties, and it is indistinct at low resolution, I would suggest that the other gentleman is also ‘Army’, perhaps going for a ride.

    Take a picture of me for the record.

    Mark

    I’ve had a little fun and have been trying to clarify the photo ; turned into negative, blown up a little, but without much luck. Mark, you just beat me to it on the ‘squaddie’ and I agree with all the clues you pointed out : the larger badge on the gent with the harness doesn’t appear to be RAF, and further clarification from the original photo might be needed, if possible to establish the regiment. Denis, is that the only info you have on the photograph? Any other clues ? Brian S.

    in reply to: FAA Skyraider AEW1. #1233255
    bms44
    Participant

    Incidentally do you know if the pilot was ok or was he killed.? Not sure if it went straight in or crash landed..

    Two killed sadly,and the third crewman seriously injured. Feb 24th 1960.

    in reply to: Ugliest Warplane #1234639
    bms44
    Participant

    ‘If it looks good, it is good’.

    The Short Seamew was definitely not. The Gannet was a thing of beauty compared to it.

    Saw a Seamew at Farnborough, so that gets my vote for pig-ugly!

    (A pic of this plane would be useful if anyone can post it).

    Anyone got a better one – or even uglier? 😉

    Bri :diablo:

    Thanks Mondariz, for the photos posted. Beauty (or ugliness,perhaps) is in the eye of the beholder. Bri,I could argue that the Seamew is not ugly, as a dear departed maiden aunt might have said, ‘That is a dear little aeroplane! It was designed to specifications that required simplicity and cheap overall costs to produce, and operate, ease of servicing and maintenance which necessitated among other requirements, its fixed undercarriage. Far less complex than the Gannet, it could have cross-operated with escort carriers of the then NATO forces and could also have carried depth charges and bombs internally and underwing armament or sonobuoys as required. It was also designed and flown in some 18 months, at a time, for those of us who remember, when we had an aircraft industry with many independent and original design teams to be proud of, and that meant something to the rest of the world. There are far more aircraft, in my humble opinion that would bear the ‘ugly’ appellation. I agree with aunt Agatha,(not her real name!) the Seamew is (was,sadly) a Dear Little Aeroplane. :p So I’m not going to submit any more entries (although I could, but it wouldn’t be fair, bearing the personal opinion aspect in mind) Good thread though, even if it is drawing we pedantic old grumps out of the woodwork! Harrumph, and Cheers Brian S.

    in reply to: Happy birthday, Winkle! #1235889
    bms44
    Participant

    Happy birthday, Winkle!

    Agree entirely with all the above : one of the most pleasant, unassuming gentlemen in the business, always willing to share his wealth of knowledge, with a modesty befitting a true hero of our time. God Bless you Sir, and thank you. Happy Birthday!

    in reply to: Newbuild airfields #1238064
    bms44
    Participant

    Possibly I’m being rather parochial, and it’s not a military airfield, but Dundee City Airport must have a claim to being a recent build. Built largely on reclaimed land along Dundee’s Riverside Drive, due in great to the foresight of several enthusiastic amateur flyers such as Tayside Aviation’s previous Managing Director, Lovat Fraser, who formed his company at Riverside Airstrip with one aircraft, a Tipsy Nipper. The airport , developed from these very humble but far-sighted beginnings, is now very busy, offers great ab-initio and upgrade training courses, as well as being home to a number of carriers for flights to UK and European destinations.

    in reply to: Concorde on Hudson River #1238421
    bms44
    Participant

    Yes it’s G-BOAD part of the USS Intrepid museum complex……..

    http://www.intrepidmuseum.org/

    http://www.intrepidmuseum.org/The-Intrepid-Experience/Air/The-Concorde.aspx

    And more info’ here….

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/search.php?searchid=1647472

    .

    Which strikes me as a little hypocritical considering the Concorde took so long to gain acceptance over the pond (if indeed it ever did) : they never managed to produce anything to equal it, (the Soviets tried and failed with very sad results when ‘Concordski’ had the horrendous crash at the Paris Air Show.
    (How well maintained is the Intrepid’s Concord by the way, does anyone have any update? :diablo:

    bms44
    Participant

    Many thanks Brian for the date, My interest stems from the fact that I was serving with Culdrose Station flight at the time of this incident. It was employed on Round Robin Flights which included Northern Ireland, Speke Roborough,Lee on the Solent, Yeovilton and Prestwick. I worked on this XR444as a visiting aircraft but couldn’t remember if the last time it had dry feet was at Culdrose. In any case there was always concern when an aircraft was lost that was until the BoI had made it’s findings public. Ground crews always get nervous when the A700 gets locked in the squadron safe!

    Cheers Ollie, that’s very interesting, but it would appear any suspicion or recrimination on your part would have been dispelled by the subsequent findings, but your concern at the time is wholly understandable! There may be evidence available but I would hesitate and deem it intrusive and maybe insensitive to dig any deeper ; the individual(s) at fault probably paid dearly for their mistake, if finger-trouble it proved to be. I believe there were a couple of injuries in the accident, but luckily no loss of life.

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 309 total)