dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,521 through 2,535 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Heinkel shot by 9mm Luger #1382235
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Melvyn, there is a place called Sainte Véronique [or Sint-Verone], in Flemish Brabant, Flemish Region, Belgium. As Dunkirk is in Belgium, perhps this is the place? It is not on the coast though, it’s just east of Brussels.

    in reply to: WWII Colour film – downloadable #1382345
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Yes, maybe some of their photos are from the postwar era, but it is still a very good collection of shots. It is easy enough to distinguish the genuine wartime shots from modern ones.

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk26 first flight #426838
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Agreed Daz, and don’t get me wrong, the plane itself looks great. Just the paint work does not look right. I’m just picky about these things I guess through being involved with painting aircraft in a past life and knowing the right way is just as easy as the wrong way.

    in reply to: "ACME" Quiz #1383160
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Perhaps a ballast weight from a flying boat?

    Or a tie down, maybe for an airship?

    in reply to: The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress being looped #1383346
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Didn’t the Dutch Air Force used to have a display for airshows where they rolled a Friendship? Did that ever loop too?

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk26 first flight #426856
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I agree with you Janie – the paint scheme looks as bad as Charles Church’s Spitfire did, or the CAF Wildcat

    in reply to: Other stars of the Memphis Belle #1384611
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    There was also the professionally made programme at the time called “Belle and the Glory Boys” which was the official behind the scenes promotion. It was pretty good, but mainly concentrated on the main actors. However they were very clever in pairing up the actoes with the real crewmen they were supposedly playing from the real Memphis Belle. I was unfortunate in missing about the first half as it was on one Saturday afternnon and I hadn’t seen it advertised, but I taped the end. It too has footage of the Binbrook crash. I was bitterly disappointed that this programme was not included as an extra on the DVD I bought. It was made by the same company so I can’t see why not.

    in reply to: Heinkel shot by 9mm Luger #1384623
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Sorry Melvyn, I think everyone was trying to think of constructive angles on this but there’s not a lot to go on. I asked if he was British or otherwise for the very same reason you just mentioned, that maybe the place was known as different titles to different people.

    As far as time scale goes I would think it most likely that you can narrow it down to after May 10th. In fact at what date did the BEF start gathering at Dunkirk beach? Surelythey fought for several days before the retreat toi the beach?

    in reply to: Heinkel shot by 9mm Luger #1385662
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Was this chap British that owned the compass Melvyn?

    I wonder since he says 500M which I assume refers to metres, indicating perhaps he was French or something? Odd for a Brit to use metres in those days rather than yards.

    in reply to: General Discussion #389222
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    This thread is perhaps a little ill-conceived, but it does raise a very valid question. Yes, we all want to smash Brad Pitt… but I am sure Ian is not the first person to receive physical threats via PM – and I can say that because I have received a physical threat and a heap of abuse from another member in the past myself. People need to know where they stand I think, in case it happens again. The moderators and webmaster need to make the rules perfectly clear.

    In my case this occurred before the days of moderators, when that psycho freak Kenneth Williams was posting abusive messages all over the place about members of this forum because many of us were sceptical that he’d seen Doulas Bader home on holiday from a German POW camp. I had not even made a single attack on him in the thread unlike most people, but I made a witty remark he was too daft to get. It was not an attack on Williams and his ill-conceived fantasies. Itwas related to another person’s post, not his rants. He thought my joke was a genuine offer of assistance to his daft cause. It wasn’t.

    When I had to explain that I’d made a joke – something he couldn’t see till it was spelled out – that was when he PM’ed me and went bollistic, saying he knew where I lived and he regularly comes to NZ so would track me down and hurt me bad, etc.

    I have to say, it really was a shock. There were still people following his ridiculous thread who thought he was a nice old man and a caring veteran of the war, so I thought buggar him, I’ll expose what he’s really like, a nasty twisted violent old git. I posted his PM’s contents to the thread, so others knew he was threatening violence and ranting like a nutter at me. He never contacted me again thankfully, but I got some abuse from one or two members for breaking the privacy of a PM. Who cares, people like him need to be exposed and stopped.

    If moderators were around then I’d have handled it differently and hoped they’d step in and do something. Can we hear what the clear plan of action will be when this occurs again please? Is it a warning or a banning?

    in reply to: Question for Flood. #1951127
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    This thread is perhaps a little ill-conceived, but it does raise a very valid question. Yes, we all want to smash Brad Pitt… but I am sure Ian is not the first person to receive physical threats via PM – and I can say that because I have received a physical threat and a heap of abuse from another member in the past myself. People need to know where they stand I think, in case it happens again. The moderators and webmaster need to make the rules perfectly clear.

    In my case this occurred before the days of moderators, when that psycho freak Kenneth Williams was posting abusive messages all over the place about members of this forum because many of us were sceptical that he’d seen Doulas Bader home on holiday from a German POW camp. I had not even made a single attack on him in the thread unlike most people, but I made a witty remark he was too daft to get. It was not an attack on Williams and his ill-conceived fantasies. Itwas related to another person’s post, not his rants. He thought my joke was a genuine offer of assistance to his daft cause. It wasn’t.

    When I had to explain that I’d made a joke – something he couldn’t see till it was spelled out – that was when he PM’ed me and went bollistic, saying he knew where I lived and he regularly comes to NZ so would track me down and hurt me bad, etc.

    I have to say, it really was a shock. There were still people following his ridiculous thread who thought he was a nice old man and a caring veteran of the war, so I thought buggar him, I’ll expose what he’s really like, a nasty twisted violent old git. I posted his PM’s contents to the thread, so others knew he was threatening violence and ranting like a nutter at me. He never contacted me again thankfully, but I got some abuse from one or two members for breaking the privacy of a PM. Who cares, people like him need to be exposed and stopped.

    If moderators were around then I’d have handled it differently and hoped they’d step in and do something. Can we hear what the clear plan of action will be when this occurs again please? Is it a warning or a banning?

    in reply to: DH 86 Express #1385880
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    According to the Putnam book it was De H NZ that did the rebuild and it “reverted to the original owners” which I assume were Union Airways of NZ? Does that help?

    That is interesting. I wasn’t aware of this at all. I thought Union Airways was wound up at the end of the war when the Governemnt formed National Airways Corporation (now Air New Zealand). There are a few books on Union Airways, if I rememebr when in the library I’ll see if the aircraft and its fate are mentioned.

    in reply to: DH 86 Express #1386042
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Just a point Dave., the engines were Gipsy Sixes not Gipsy MOTH Sixes

    I thought it didn’t sound right, but that’s what the book said. Cheers for the correction.

    Who rebuilt the DH86 after the war? Was it De Havilland New Zealand that did this? If so, who for? Did it fly here after the war? I had not heard this.

    in reply to: DH 86 Express #1386112
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Other details that may help you…

    Span: 64 ft 6 in (19.66 m)
    Length: 46 ft 1 1/4 in (14.07 m)
    Maximum speed: at 1000 ft (305 m) 170 mph (272 km/h)
    Cruising speed: 140 mph (224 km/h)
    Range: 750 miles (1,197 km)

    One of the RNZAF Express’s was destroyed in a crash in 1940, the other two received bomb racks in 1941 when invasion looked likely. Later they spent some time in Fiji with their little cousins, several DH89’s of the RNZAF, in the GR role. Later returned to NZ and trained wireless operators, navigators, etc till 1944.

    in reply to: DH 86 Express #1386123
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    “Engines: Four by 200hp DH Gipsy Moth-Six Mk I & 116 cylinder air coolled”

    according to a book I have

Viewing 15 posts - 2,521 through 2,535 (of 4,847 total)