dark light

Dave Homewood

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,016 through 3,030 (of 4,847 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #373925
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Daz, as Yak139 says, there is nothing stopping you going to uni now, is there?

    When I left school most of my mates went to university but I joined the RNZAF. I learned a trade and was very good at it, but alas it doesn’t really transpose too well into the civilian workforce. Not many jobs call for packing parachutes and liferafts, etc. One area of the trade I did learn I thought would bode well, upholstery. But when I have applied for jobs in upholstery, they say I’m over-qualified (they want a pay-nothing know-nothing to machine that same thing hour after hour…) or under-qualified because though I was fully trained and had run the Fabric Section for a year and a half myself, the RNZAF didn’t give you a trade certificate so bosses don’t recognise pure experience.

    So when I was jobhunting I found it was like hitting a brickwall trying to do what I’d trained in and loved. I then got a job, a local guy gave me a break in a place making truck covers and shade sails, etc. It was short term over summer. I was paid rubbish money and I knew more than the foreman! I don’t mean to sound obnoxious when I say that, but I literally had more experience than him, and yet I was the ‘boy’. At the end of the contract the boss said, “You’ve done very well over summer. As you know, we are planning to take on a new apprentice, and I’d like to offer that apprenticeship to you.” I was fuming. Though he thought it was a kind offer, I really couldn’t see my way to spending three years on apprentice wages doing a job I was fully capable of doing just to get a slip of bloody paper saying I could do it! And by that time I’d had a guts full of it there as I didn’t particularly like the work on truck covers.

    So I said no and left. I kicked around in crap go-nowhere jobs for a while, and then after I’d had a time not working due to a severe wrist injury, i decided I’m not going back to that crap life. I decided to retrain. I went to university. I am still there and will hopefully complete my studies this year. I have learned all about making films and TV, a lot about computers and making websites and much handy stuff, I’ve also studied history and all sorts of bits and pieces. And I’ve had fun and met lots of great people.

    And as an adult student I and other mates have found we have such an advantage over kids straight from school. Life experience counts hugely and a mature attitude will see you doing very well if you put your mind to it.

    Apparently according to statistics, university graduates are in the top 15% of wage earners, and screen and media graduates (what I’m doing) have the best chance of securing a steady full-time high paying job in their chosen industry within 6 months of graduation. So I can only look forward I guess.

    We can learn from past mistakes and have regrets, but they’ll never change things.
    The biggest decision I made was leaving the RNZAF when I was doing so well in it. I wanted to see the world. Recently I’ve been in touch with several guys I was in with and they’re still in the RNZAF. I realise now I miss the lifestyle and everything. It was a great life and a much better job than any other I’ve had. But, on the other hand I don’t regret leaving because if I hadn’t set on the course of life I’m on now, I would never have met all the people here in Cambridge whom I now call my best friends. I have an amazing group of friends of all ages who mean the world to me. I had great friends in the RNZAF, but nowhere near as close as my mates now. If I had to live over I’d change nothing because no matter how bad life gets, it’s friends that count.

    My only true deep regret in life is that I did not start my research into people who were in the RNZAF from Cambridge ten years ago or more. So much has been lost in the intervening years as people have passed away, and I’ll never get those stories and memories now. But I guess what I have done since I began in August 2003 is much more than many have achieved and I’m extremely proud of my work on that project.

    in reply to: Whats happening with B-17D 'Swoose'?! #1434773
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks for that info Eric. Very interesting. So which ones are still flying? I see one is going up in May (despite Bush cancelling the shuttle programme apparently :confused: )

    You mention the runway barriers in case of emergency. A few years ago Dad and I went with a group from the Royal Aeronautical Society up to Auckland International Airport, Mangere, for a look around. We were told by the control tower manager on the tour that Mangere has one of those special barriers set up and a Nasa team comes to the airport during every launch because if a shuttle gets into trouble over the Pacific we might be the first emergency strip.

    Imagine the buzz if a shuttle landed at Auckland!! I guess they chose Mangere because it’s an ismith (sp?) in a harbour so the shuttle could be barged out later.

    Sorry about the off-topic stuff – B17D’s are interesting too. Thanks for the stories Jules.

    One last question, which of the shuttles was the one Buzz Aldrin and Homer Simpson went up in? 🙂

    in reply to: Racing and Civilian liveried Spitfires #1345703
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I’ll bet the Spitfire pilot shat himself when he looked in the rear vision mirror!

    in reply to: Airworthy Stuka?(2005 Zombie) #1345972
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    The Stuka had a lot of success in Greece and Crete too – the fear of the attacks having as much effect as the attacks themselves.

    I think the time is right for a flying Stuka, even if it is an exact replica. I don’t think in the past it has been so appropriate, many millions of people wouldn’t have appreciated seeing and hearing one again I guess. But now we have Fw190’s, Me262’s, Zero’s and now even Oscars flying again. They are more appreciated these days, the Axis aircraft, I think.

    in reply to: Aviation Art #1345982
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Thanks

    in reply to: Aviation Art #1348112
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    I am most impressed with the paintings by forumites here. Well done everyone.

    I am afraid I almost totally lack any artistic skill when it comes to painting, I wish I could paint like that.

    However recently I have been dabbling and experimenting with a much easier option, digital art. I have recently thrown together these “paintings” using several photos layered upon each other and manipulated. I don’t think they are very good at all but they are just a start and I have been experimenting really. Put it this way, my Mum liked them, so that’s al that matters.

    The theme is pilot training in the wartime RNZAF, Tiger Moth, Harvard and Kittyhawk. The places are real wartime ststions, Omaka and Woodbourne.

    The Harvards are actually just a segment of a much wider mural style scene, as I took the photos of Woodbourne in 1989 and found the three snaps overlaid perfectly when I scanned them last month.

    Some day I’ll do better versions of these piccies.

    in reply to: The Flying Leathernecks #1348283
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Well, I didn’t find it particularly disjointed really, I thought it was ok. I never noticed any European war footage either. Is there some? Perhaps this was edited for the DVD release??

    And I didn’t see any P-47 footage either, unless that was the planes that carried the gun cameras? I did see a few fleeting shots of SB2C Helldivers in the attack scenes but they fitted right in there anyway. You cannot expect just one squadron to be making a large scale raid in the Pacific, they usually mixed in many types in one raid.

    In fact I was just reading about the NZ Fighter Wing’s involvement in Allied bomber missions on Rabaul. As we were flying P40’s they had to stay with the bombers in “close cover”, glued to protecting the bombers. Then above would be Hellcats in “low cover”, and above them Corsairs in “medium cover” and then in “top cover” were Corsairs or P38 Lightnings. That’s how they stacked them, so in any attack you can expect a few types to be seen. Don’t forget the P47 did play a role in the Pacific too so if they were there they are not really out of place.

    I also thought that while they used T6’s as Japs, they did use them quite cleverly and were usually in long shot. For closer shots of Jap aircraft real footage was used, and I think the director did a very good job.

    One thing that struck me about this film is how many films I’ve seen now about a squadron that gets a tough commander that they all distrust, over the second-in-command that the men all love as a brother and feel should be boss. It’s a real classic scenario really, and not very original. I can think of The Flying Leathernecks, Command Decision and Twelve O’Clock High where the tough boss making the men extend themselves plot theme is used. Any more?

    Still it’s better than the standard used in all aviation flicks these days, two pilots in love with the same woman…

    in reply to: Stunning fire-fighting Neptune #1348360
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    WOW!!

    Great photos.

    Now I REALLY want to see ‘Always’ again. That first shot reminds me of John Goodman copping the load! I wish I could track down that film.

    in reply to: Warbirds and women #1348520
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Wasn’t it Richard Shuttleworth’s mother that started the Shuttleworth collection in his memory too? She has had an amazing impact on warbird and vintage aviation then

    in reply to: Forum member escorted from Aus by security troops #1348524
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Never seen water ‘run’ anywhere, it lacks any kind of solid stucture to do so, not to mention will power…..now FLOWING is a whole different matter….one could say it FLOWS down the drain the wrong/right way, depending on where you’re from…

    M

    Well Mark, since you’re American I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt for not having an Oxford Dictionary of English, but among the many variations that the word ‘run’ can mean, included are
    “…spread; flow; exude liquid; function; travel or convey from one point to another; …” so I believe water can run 😉

    Hence the expression “I’ve got the runs!” 😮

    in reply to: Warbirds and women #1348726
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Who was that lady that owned an A26 and a few other planes in the UK in the early 1990’s? They were all black with nose art of a lady on

    in reply to: Warbirds and women #1348733
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    How about Lynnette Zuccoli in Australia, doesn’t she fly?

    There used to be a lady based at Ardmore, NZ, who wingwalked – Rusty Butterworth I think – while her husband flew their Tiger Moth. Not quite the same though.

    And a few from history… Jean Batten, Amy Johnston, and that American one who crashed in the Pacific – forgotten her name

    in reply to: Whats happening with B-17D 'Swoose'?! #1350231
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    There is a photo in an early 1990’s issue of New Zealand Wings of The Swoose, taken by the RNZAF while she resided in New Zealand for a short time. It said in the caption that the reason it became a transport was it was the only survivor of a raid – the rest of the squadron was shot down. That link Peter posted doesn’t mention this.

    Which Space Shuttle is that? Is it the prototype? The space programme is on again I see, they may need it back at NASA soon!

    in reply to: Steveyoug-vonperthes-seafuryfan RAFM Feb05 #1350241
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    Dave, the marine merlin was a boat powerplant. I think someone’s tongue might be firmly embedded in his cheek to suggest that the marine merlin was installed in the Seagull.

    Thanks re the Merlin – and I was pretty sure he weas joking about the Merlin on a Walrus. It could have been a bigger disaster than when HMNZS Leander launched their Walrus with one of the tie-down strps still attached! 😮 😀

    Another RNZAF Walrus was lost when the pilot forgot the wheels were down and landed like that on the sea! 😮

    I’ve often wondered if any poor erks were killed trying to attach the crane strop. They used to climb on the top wing right beside the spinning prop. Not nice in choppy sea!

    in reply to: Steveyoug-vonperthes-seafuryfan RAFM Feb05 #1350263
    Dave Homewood
    Participant

    But Paul McSweeney said the yellow on the Merlin was thought very seriously to be the original colour. The aircraft was bought by the RAAF during the war and never used. It sat in a crate for about 50 years before being sold on, and has only flown 400 hours since it was built. He said the engine hasn’t been repaineted by a wrbird operator.

    That is why I asked about this marine Merlin, I wondered if there was a connection. I guess not.

    Please, someone explain seriously – is the marine Merlin for boats or for sea-going aircraft? Or both?

    Seafuryfan, are you seriously suggesting a Merlin was fitted to a Walrus variant? I’d be verydoubtful mate. It would completely change to c of g for a start. It’d rip the top wing off!

Viewing 15 posts - 3,016 through 3,030 (of 4,847 total)