Interesting Geoff, I wonder why they have been missed. they’re not exactly unknown.
There’s a good possibility that they may still be sitting there, rotting away along with many other treasures in the Pacific. I wonder why more aircraft haven’t been recovered from some of the islands – when you see what they have done with some of the wrecks from Russia, surely many of the aircraft there could be used as a basis for restoration. And perhaps recovery of wrecks could be a good moneyspinner for the impoverished Pacific economies. I know the climates are different between Russia and the pacific, but there have been a handful of successful recoveries of wrecked Pacific aircraft that have been put back into the air – including those associated with Charles Darby and his team (several P40’s and a soon-to-fly P47). So why are so many rare Japanese and Allied aircraft still left to the elements?
Does ‘War Prizes’ mention the ME109E that the RNZAF had? Or the Albatross that NZ got after WWI. Sadly both were destroyed after WWII when the Canterbury Museum decided they wouldn’t house them. Absolute idiots. The Albatross had been in the museum there for some time but the current management were apparently pascifists after the war and decided to burn the extremely valuable aircraft 😮 🙁
These aircraft were surrendered at Rabaul, but they were all flown to Jaquinot Bay where the RNZAF had a base. An RNZAF pilot flew the Jake, while the rest were flown by Japanese pilots.
The RNZAF only brought the one Zero (and the engines, propellors and instruments of the Dinah) home because there was a lack of shipping space for the rest. Apparently the Jake sank at its moorings a month or so after arriving there, but one book I have says that Dinah and the Kate, along with two Zeros that were owned by the RAAF, were still at the same place as recently as 1972. The fate of the RNZAF’s second Zero isn’t known.
Does anyone know which Zero is pictured above? Is it the A6M3 or A6M5 – they all look the same to me. 🙂
here’s the last shot of the Jake with a Catalina.
Just for your interest this is a scan of the inside cover page of an RNZAF Air Gunner’s log book – which was issued to Flight Engineers too as they had to train first as an Air Gunner. The book itself is smaller in width than a pilot’s log book, perhaps just 3/4 of the width.
This chap, the late Jim Ross, was first a Flight Mechanic, then he decided to become aircrew and became a Flight Engineer on Hudsons and Catalinas in the Pacific.
Daz,
You may find this link of interest which has scans of an RNZAF pilot’s log book. The RNZAF book was much the same as the RAF one it seems.
http://www.burrowes.org/FamilyTree/E.F.G.Burrowes_LogBook/
One thing I want to mention is that from what I’ve been told by several pilots, the entries in red ink are night flights, not missions as mentioned above. However if the pilot were on RAF bombers or night fighters this equates to much the same thing which may be where the confusion arose.
Also I understand that when pilots or crews were awarded medals they got an endorsement thing to slip inside their log book at the appropriate page.
The log books are an absolute treasure of recorded history and it is superb when you look through a well detailed one. A lot of the information that I’ve been gathering for my Cambridge project has come from old logbooks.
It is also interesting to note that people other than pilots also had their own logbooks, airgunners, navigators, flight engineers, etc… anyone who flew I guess
I popped into Southwards’ Museum in February this year and I don’t recall seeing any aircraft other than the Vampire and the Tiger Moth , but according to their oficial website they do indeed have the Vickers 22 Monoplane. No mention of any other aircraft though.
The museum has a very interesting collection of cars, motorbikes, bicycles, and numerous other small collections of this and that. Sadly not well endowed on the aviation front.
Thanks Mark, I didn’t realise their was an earlier 1986 ediion of the book. It is quite possible that Johnnie himself picked up on the mistake (if it were one) and it was noted for the second edition.
Whoever the pilot was, I think that they were indeed very lucky. This is an amazing piece of footage, and thank goodness it didn’t end in tragedy. I’ve seen too much footage of classic aircraft hitting the deck at air displays, the Rolls Royce Spitfire, the RNHF Firefly, the BAe Mosquito, the Chipmunk at Wanaka 1994 and also a Tiger Moth with wing walker (all of which were fatal).
However my view is aerobatics are the principle part of a warbids of classic aircraft display, and they should continue. Otherwise it’s like owning a classic car and only pushing it, rather than driving it! Aerobatics keep the history alive for future generations to see what these planes could do.
I think rather than idiocy it was probably a genuine mistake. Everybody makes them – the best pilots included. Thank goodness it wasn’t a BIGGER mistake.
I’m keen to find out if the aircraft was ok after a maintainence check.
Lynn (Lonestar Merlin), I couldn’t get that link to work.
I must excuse myself…….I should have said P-40 pilots AND crews. Without the maintenance guys no airplane would ever fly and it’s obviously only right to give them some credit too.
Indeed Phantom II, I have spoken with many of the Kiwis who were up in the Pacific, and read many books by others, and the conditions the groundcrews were under was simply awful compared with those fighting in Europe. In the daytime the aircraft would heat up so much in the sun that to touch the aluminium surface would burn the skin so bad it would come off apparently, and you couldn’t leave your tools out of the shade or they were also too hot to pick up. And they were expected to maintain full squadrons of aircraft for readiness each day. At night they were bombed so often by ‘Washing Machine Charlie’ they spent more time out of bed than in, running to the slit trenches. The food was disgusting, the living conditions rancid with rats and snakes and insects in the tents, etc. Trying to eat with the insects round was near impossible. One guy told me he was eating a can of bullybeef when he accidentally swallowed a fly. He began to throw up, and due to the poor health state most were in including him, he couldn’t stop vomiting and he became so dehydrated he had to be hospitalised. I could see as he told me he really thought he was a gonner – he began to cry as he told me, 60 years later. That upset him more than anything else he told me about. Amazing.
And then there was the disease and constant threat of it – and the medication needed such as salt tablets and anti-malaria pills which turned the skin bright yellow: this colour apparently leached from the skin for years later and after they’d return from the Pacific for some time they always found their white sheets had turned yellow overnight – another legacy of the Pacific war.
There was the lack of recreation too (except swimming with sea snakes or if brave, sightseeing amongst the Jap-sniper riddled jungles.
It amazes me how these chaps managed to do such a valiant job. All those who served, the US Navy and Marines, the RAAF, even the Japanese were under similar conditions. I dear say even the RAF chaps in the SEAC area had similar problems to deal with. But I especially admire the kiwis in the Pacific.
In a very short space of time against huge odds the New Zealanders shot down 100 enemy aircraft confirmed with their P40’s, for a much smaller loss ratio themselves (a few of which were shot down by Allies by mistake). And the groundcrews kept them flying, using all the skills could muster, and by scavaging from dumped US P40 airframes, etc. To make matters worse the US Government didn’t want the New Zealanders there, but the NZ Govt insisted so there was also politics going on behind it all. On the ground however many US units helped the kiwis out very generously, even if their Govt didn’t want them there.
Our bomber crews in the Hudsons and later Venturas also carried out extraordinary duties and they were doing work that no-one else was doing.
I would love to see your B25 film someday Corsair, and also one about the P40’s, whether US, RAAF or Kiwi. Personally I hope to make something about an RNZAF Hudson crew, maybe based around the tagedy that was survived by only Flight Sgt Trevor Ganley, who came from my home town. Now that’s a story and a half of survival.
PS – sorry for straying so far from the topic of this thread which I am also finding fascinating.
Cheers ATC Pal, yes that was the film I had a vague memory of. And interesting to see the skip bombing technique. Was this a developement of Barnes Wallis’s bouncing bomb or a totally independently thought-up technique?
Flood – so did the USN fly all those FAA types in US schemes then? Maybe the photo I recall seeing of Wildcats were actually Royal Navy Martlets in US markings? Could be an interesting area for the modellers.
Also. did the French shoot at them?
I’m sure I have seen a coloured photo of US Navy Wildcats on a carrier somewhere in the Meditearanean conflict, but I don’t know where. Maybe around the time of Anzio, Sicily or Operation Torch?
What’s this about Americans skipping bombs along the water to sink Jap ships? Is this true or just a fantasy of yours Corsair? (not meant as a jibe, I’m simply curious, as I have not heard of this sort of thing before). I agree it is high time a decent Pacific film was made too – all those made so far include either Lee Marvin, a lot of girls and gay sailors singing and dancing or even worse nonsence as in the case of *#$%@ Windtalkers, which was bordering on worse than Pearl Harbor for cheesiness and a waste of a big budget.
The Thin Red Line was good, but a bit wacked out for the average viewer. The best Pacific film’sTV shows have all been from a non-US angle, and include the BBC’s ‘Tenko’, Auusie’s mini-series ‘Heroes’ and ‘A Town Like Alice’ and the more recent mini-series ‘Changi’, which was superb. The Aussies film war stories very well. And of course the Aussie drama series The Sullivans was very very good for its time and managed to include both the Pacific, and Europe, and the home front as well. I wish they’d repeat that series here. I’s like to see a film or mini-series on the NZ efforts in the Pacific, which are as important to us as as these others to their respective countries. Maybe I will do it someday.
Oh yeah, hasn’t Mel (never mind the truth) Gibson already done a film where he flew B25s?
Very sad news indeed.
But at least he is one of the very few who will always remain immortalised and remembered. We’ll never forget him and all the others he stood for.
I have seen the footage that you refer to also at the IWM in London. When i was there in 1996/97ish they had it playing in a simulator type thing so it was on a big screen right in front of you and you moved with the action.
I am sure that from memory the blurb for the simulator claimed that the film was taken from the leader’s aircraft, Group Captain Pickard. But he was shot down and killed so I doubt the film was from his plane unless the Germans recovered it and kept it for posterity. Either way it was extremely dramatic. I am sure I have scene a piece of it in a documentary too but I don’t remember where. I think a video was released of the footage around the 50th Anniversary, but i can’t be certain of that. I know several paintings were done then too, and a lot was in the press. It was one of the glory raids of the RAF like the Dam Busters ilk.
One of Cambridge’s (my home town) airmen was killed on Operation Jericho too. Richard Webb Sampson (NZ401465) was a navigator in a 464 Sqn (RAAF) Mosquito FB.VI MM404/T and after they bombed the target flak hit the aircraft killing **** outright. The pilot was wounded and belly landed in the snow at Freneuville, to be taken prisoner.
The RNZAF operated P40E’s, K’s, M’s and N’s. From what I’ve read in several books the RNZAF personnel referred to all the models only as the Kittyhawk, despite the Americans calling them Warhawks. Perhaps because our first batches of P40’s came from RAF orders (?).
Yet I have a contemporary source, Contact magazine (the RNZAF’s official magazine) from 1943 in which the article about them calls them Warhawks. So perhaps they were called both here in NZ. A neat article it is, with lots of photos of a P40 squadron making the journey from NZ to the forward area in the Pacific, and they make a comparison to it being like migrating birds.
I prefer Kittyhawk.
This websitelists ten Americans who flew in the Battle of Britain, and gives a little about each.
I know one of them appeared in the series Hunters In The Sky, interviewed about his part in the war. Can’t recall which one now. I think he was in a few episodes including International Squadrons about the Eagle Sqns.
Thanks all, and particularly you Cees for the very interesting replies. And I second the thank yous for your efforts and those of your fellow team members. It is a great shame that you do not get more recognition. Perhaps you should write an article for Flypast to make others aware of what you do and raise interest in the group.
When the remains of aircrew who have been missing are recovered and buried properly, are their names then taken off the existing ‘missing’ memorials such as at Runnymede?
I did see the twisted prop memorial on the news item. A very nice gesture for that man to erect such a memorial.
I first heard about the Stirling recovery story many months ago when it featured on the Holmes show (a current affairs programme) because it followed a NZ Policeman who’s uncle was one of the two Kiwis recovered and he’d gone over to assist in the recovery. I found the story fascinating and moving, and I salute the guys who carry out these recoveries – both military and volunteer civilians.
Here in New Zealand we seldom hear of such stories because there are so few men missing in air crashes within the country itself in comparison to Europe and the Pacific, etc. However a missing Hudson that crashed into the sea on the west coast was discovered only a few weeks ago when fishermen pulled the engine and prop up in their net. The engine has now gone to the RNZAF Museum. i don’t know if they intend to recover anything more, such as the crew.
Oh yes, and according to Heartbeat, if a crashed wreck has a body in it, it is considered a war grave and mustn’t be touched by anyone without a special licence. Not sure how accurate this is though.