dark light

Austere

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 106 through 116 (of 116 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mirage 2000-5Mk2 vs Gripen-C/D #2369354
    Austere
    Participant

    That’s depend of what version of APG 68 or RDY we are talking about. When the F 16 blk 52 (or 50?), Mirage 2000 and Gripen C competed for the Polish contract, the RDY had the longest detection range, followed by the APG 68(V)9, and the Gripen’s radar was the last.

    This is very, very intersting, and confirms my estimates.

    What’s your source?

    P.S.: The radar should have been the RDY-2, though…

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2369922
    Austere
    Participant

    MICA IIR is an all aspect missile with LOBL & LOAL modes and datalink updates for BVR engagements. MICA IIR can also be used as an extra sensor by Rafale’s weapon system.

    MICA can be used as a FLIR, not IRST… and the same is possible for the Typhoon with its IRIS-T 😉 (source: RID)

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2369975
    Austere
    Participant

    Thank you TR1 😉

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2370038
    Austere
    Participant

    Thank you guys… 😉

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2370051
    Austere
    Participant

    First batch was for 30, and it looks like it is almost complete, which nice because the first 2 took forever.

    Regarding MiG-1.42, gents, I think there is too little info on the program, coupled with the fact that it never gestated, to say if it was more or less advanced than F-22.

    So, as of now, how many MiG-31 has the VVS decided to upgrade? 30 in total?

    in reply to: Nice MMRCA News and Discussion 9 #2370057
    Austere
    Participant

    Yes. But as I said, Gripen etc. can guide missiles with their radars switched off.

    Western designers all seem to have realised that one of the advantages of active radar missiles is that the launching aircraft doesn’t need to use a radar, if it can get targeting information from elsewhere, so provided their aircraft with separate data channels for communication with AAMs. Gripen makes a big thing of it. And, of course, it works equally well for IR homing missiles.

    So… could a Typhoon uplink an AMRAAM without switching on its radar?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2372044
    Austere
    Participant

    Anyone can shed some light on this bird?
    IAPO Su-30, Bort No. #05. Features canards, SAAB AVITRONICS suite and IFF bird slicers..

    Is that the Su-30MKI #05 prototype reworked to Su-30MKM?
    Or first Su-30SM for RuAF?

    http://cemichael.livejournal.com/345903.html

    I think it’s a Su-30SM… the airframe seems to be new

    in reply to: Chinese HQ-16 (LY-80) Surface to Air Missile System #1795853
    Austere
    Participant

    Whats the reasoning behind the land based version being cold-launched? http://cheesebuerger.de/images/smilie/konfus/a050.gif

    I think it’s due to the position of launchers… there’s no space between them and the ground so extremely hot exaust gas could damage the vehicle and its wheels.

    Austere
    Participant

    Thanks guys! 🙂

    Just one question… Does anyone know how many russian Su-27UB/30s are involved in their respective update programs?

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2373965
    Austere
    Participant

    Thank you Toan ; )

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News & Discussions Thread V #2374207
    Austere
    Participant

    Will the AESA RBE-2 have a NCTR capability?

Viewing 11 posts - 106 through 116 (of 116 total)