Come on guys…..at least have a guess!….frank-where are you?
I like this! It stands out against some of the relentless all white fuselage and web address stuff.
TTP. Yes the IL76 does have an overhead crane system as does the AN124. The flooring on these aircraft varied as far as I recall. Most versions had the so called “ball matting” floor system with locking points for pallets located at strategic points on the freight deck floor. On all versions there was seating that folded out length ways along the cabin walls, there was also what looked like attatchment points down the centre of the cabin floor for additional lengthways seating for military use when required. These additional seating points were usually only present on the converted military examples that had the faired over rear gun poition and the aft gunners glazed cabin at the base of the fin. Pure “civil” versions have an entirely different tail cone section minus rear turret.
TTP Hi mate….I’m afraid that my only experience with the C141 is seeing them overfly my house going into Mildenhall air base, and they are one of my favourite heavylifters. By what you say the rear door systems on both types seem very similar. The inner door on the IL76 also takes a long time to close and locks with a thud that you can feel through the floor even if you are at the front of the aircraft. I was told by an Aeroflot loadmaster that it can be opened in flight providing the main cabin was not pressurised at the time, the same for the C141 I suspect. One really good system on the IL76 was the electrically operated winch! This was a real boon for the onload of tricky cargo and it ran the entire length of the freight deck, I’m not sure if C141 has this. My own opinion on this incident is that the aircraft may be one of many badly maintained specimens that are flying these days. We used to see one through Stansted that was based in Sudan quite often and its state and appearance made your “toes curl”!
Great pic!…..Not keen on the livery though, well past its prime and its replacement not much better. Welcome to the forum.
Sad news. I seem to remember that when we used to ramp the IL76s at STN that at the rear of the main deck situated just inside the ramp area was a huge swing down door with massive hydraulic locking pins which formed a bulkhead between the freight cabin and the rear loading ramp. Now the closure of that bulkhead door was an integral part of the ramp closure process, at least it was on the Aeroflot and Uzbek examples. I’m pretty sure that you can’t close one securely without the other so goodness knows what went wrong here.
Luv it!………………….anymore like that?
Aw OK! But I may need a day or two to research….Stay tuned!
Well done guys!!! yes its the Shanghai Y-10 or Yun 10 depending on the publication used. I inderstand that it now rests in the Datang-Shan Aviation Museum near Beijing.
I never claimed that it was pretty! And it DID fly.
Don’t give up Mongu!………Keep going.!
Hmmmmmmmmmmm…..No sorry Andrew.
OK Frank, I’ll donate the prize elsewhere. I’ll do my best to dream up another puzzle so stay tuned!
Well done Frank……you’ve got it! Yes its all that remains of the 2nd prototype of the VEB/Baade 152. Built in the German Democratic Republic, first flight was in Aug.1960. First prototype crashed due to fuel starvation caused by the collapse of the internal military spec “bladder tanks” in the wings. As you said it was based on a Luftwaffe wartime design for a bomber and used that monotrack landing gear-although on this second airframe the u/c config was changed to conventional multiple units mounted aft of the engine pods. Developement ceased following a directive from the USSR that only licence built Soviet types could be built in the GDR (ie: the VEB/IL14. I understand that an exhibition concerning this aircraft has recently opened in Dresden.
Yep! and they can “kneel” so that the foreward loading ramp is almost level with the tarmac. You should see the towbar for this thing!