dark light

Maple 01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 151 Squadron Seat Type Parachute Harness #769404
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Your starter for 10,

    http://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=188451

    Flt Sgt, Listed as an observer rather than a Nav (EDIT – Because he was a RADAR Op…….doooh!)

    in reply to: Supermarine Swift move……. #784817
    Maple 01
    Participant

    yes but apart from that……

    in reply to: A rant about film credits #794283
    Maple 01
    Participant

    I’ve just had a flash-back to that episode of Dad’s Army where Captain Mainwaring had a hissy-fit when the Warminster-on-Sea platoon rushed out of the cinema instead of standing for the National Anthem…….

    Mind-you, we used to do that in the Astra and Jeboa cinemas in Berlin….. πŸ™‚

    Maple 01
    Participant

    Thanks

    Maple 01
    Participant

    Talking about scrap hardly worth attention in a modern, relevant, forward-looking museum, what became of Hendon’s RR Vulture engine?

    in reply to: Significant Memorabilia #795998
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Just before I left the mob I scrounged some bits from a T2 Jaguar that was being ‘reduced to produce’ which I eventually passed on to City of Norwich Aviation Museum

    The star item was a Jag undercart door well and truly ‘zapped’ internally with a large ‘Jesus loves Porn’ sticker – the understanding was that the hallowed item should go n display ‘as received’

    in reply to: Canopy DV Panels. Why? #798712
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Didn’t the Canberra gold-fish bowl have a habit if misting up during rapid altitude changes? Would make sense to have a small DV panel ‘just in case’

    in reply to: Lancasters crashed in Franconia in WW2 – Part 1 #805144
    Maple 01
    Participant

    According to an old post (which I’ve linked to below) 11A = Aircraft Bomb Gear

    https://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?127349-Aircraft-part-number-list-v6

    Whitley_Project credited as source

    Hope this helps

    in reply to: A couple of Plessey Breeze connectors wanted #805605
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Click on your chosen image three times, firstly you’ll get a small windowed version, click again and you’ll get a bigger image, click a third time and Bob’s your uncle

    in reply to: Generator (?) prop I.D. #805647
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Being ex-mob I have good reason to believe because they were relatively small they were easy to “souvenir” er “borrow” er “liberate”……I mean not that I would of course…..oh dear me no. Hence while there are a few more around. Believe be, I’d have ‘liberated’ the entire Jag that was being ‘reduced to produce’ rather than the few panels I did get away with (allegedly) if I’d had the space.

    in reply to: Generator (?) prop I.D. #806072
    Maple 01
    Participant

    I can only offer the view that it seems vaguely 0/400 or Vimy stylee wind generator

    in reply to: Argentinian Stukas #806365
    Maple 01
    Participant

    I’d go along with a miss-identification of F-4U hulks but anything’s possible, just check-out some of the’old junk’ you lot have horded just ‘because’ πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: RAF Celebrate The Anniversary Of Pacman #811700
    Maple 01
    Participant

    As I understand it, the design work was done for free by the agency – Apparently they then showed the logo to a focus group of their target audience who liked it. BUT, and this is the problem, they didn’t like it AND connect it to the RAF, they just liked the design – as a design. Without that connection, explanation and meaning it could be the new logo for Group 4 security

    in reply to: RAF Celebrate The Anniversary Of Pacman #812077
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Maybe she’s grumpy because you ignored the information in her first reply.

    She sent a PR puff about the RAF100 logo, not the green/yellow monstrosity, but maybe it’s SOP to answer the question you would like to have been asked rather than the one you were actually asked?

    The item in question is not something that the RAF Museum came up with so why ask them?

    They are the ones selling it, you’d sell something you had no idea about? Here’s some harmless white power for you to pass out……

    Hope this helps white knight πŸ™‚

    in reply to: RAF Celebrate The Anniversary Of Pacman #812124
    Maple 01
    Participant

    Got another reply from Hendon today…..she’s a bit grumpy

    “As mentioned in my first email, the green yellow and blue logo is the dynamic roundel, which is being used by all RAF Charities to mark RAF100, following the RAF’s brand guidelines.

    If you have any further questions about the branding of RAF100 you should contact the RAF’s Marketing department directly.”

    In other words, “I don’t know, and don’t care, go away and bother someone else”

    I have contacted them directly – the silence is deafening…..

    Meanwhile a couple of ex-RAF forums I belong to have everyone asking WTF? A serving officer is going to have a word with Media Ops – don’t expect anything good. I mean, OK, it’s to celibate (somehow) the RAF, but how? What’s the connection? What’s wrong with Red, white and blue? I feel a FOI coming on….

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 411 total)