dark light

wilag

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 562 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • wilag
    Participant

    Agree not that spectacular, but in the finical state we are all in I guess keeping cost down will be the main factor behind this. Also 95% of the travelling public really don’t give a hoot on paint schemes, it’s just the like of us lot who complain.:)

    in reply to: Bad week for Thomson #484197
    wilag
    Participant

    If the turn round was 75 minutes I very much doubt that any engine related components were changed. (Ten minutes to open and correctly close the cowlings, Half an hour for the red hot engine to cool enough to work on it, fifteen minutes to do the paperwork Ten minutes to drink tea etc, etc)
    Also doing an engine run to leak check or validate a component with passengers on is a no-no.
    I suspect the reason you were treated to the high power run was that it would have been full of fuel, passengers and luggage full of straw donkeys. I don’t know about the runway length at Cancun but it would have been hot so the aircraft would have been heavy and Biggles would have wanted to know that he could get full power before he let his brakes off.
    As for de icing the engine I have never heard of that procedure myself so I can’t coment.
    At full power a 767 will jump about a bit, GREAT WASN’T IT!!!!
    Rgds Cking

    It may remain a total mystery on why this happed, Cking just to let you know we were at Manchester heading out to Barbados so I don’t think runway was an issue. It was along blooming flight as well, was suppose to be 8.5 hours ended up just a tad short of 11.

    See the mistake Greyarea, “2010” it was indeed,

    in reply to: Bad week for Thomson #484371
    wilag
    Participant

    Ndege, Was thinking along those lines as we had to be de-iced, was Dec 2011I wasn’t to bothered by all this, was quite good fun holding the brakes as she was jumping around, but I think for the benefit o fall others maybe Mr Captain should of explained this, thanks for the update anyway.

    in reply to: Bad week for Thomson #484408
    wilag
    Participant

    G-PJLO

    Doesnt seem to be looking too bad inside these days -> Photo Here

    It looks ok in a picture, but when you get on board and start notice things are a bit different. Don’t get me wrong, the seat pitch and the 2x3x2 is very good, just the general cabin condition was woeful, seat back tables with missing clips were wedged in with paper, arm rest broken which pointed floor bound, flickering lights and much more without going into full detail. The other strange occurrence which someone with an engineering or pilot back ground might want to answer.
    Our 767 came in from Cancun, was on stand for a round 75 mins “we were already into a four hour delay”. We boarded and taxied to 25R at Manchester, lined up then a PA from upfront which went something like this “ ladies and gentlemen just to let you know we will be powering up the engines for 30 seconds and holding the brakes, the aircraft will bounce and twitch a bit, this is just to check the engine parameters. If ok we will continue as normal”
    I have never heard this before or experienced this sat there engines screaming and our 76 was jumping all over the place then 30 sec later we shot off. They were a few worried faces I can tell you.

    in reply to: Bad week for Thomson #484627
    wilag
    Participant

    PJLO is stuck in Cancun now too.

    What’s gone wrong with her now, as I said inside was grotty and panels were coming away from the roof, some of the lights inside were out or flickering, IFE was bust and had been for some time so we were told? Wonder if she is the Friday afternoon plane of the bunch? Funny I think I am correct but isn’t PJLO the only one without winglets.

    in reply to: When are Thomson's 787's due #484857
    wilag
    Participant

    Thomson Airways is the European launch customer for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which made its UK debut at the 2010 Farnborough Air Show. Thomson is due to get its first 787s in January 2012, several years late due to development issues with the new aircraft, which has a mainly carbon fibre construction.

    Quoted from one of their websites.

    in reply to: Thomson Or Thomas Cook #485052
    wilag
    Participant

    Hi,

    I have been looking on seat guru and review sites etc at the 2 airlines, i am looking to go book a trip to mexico and travel in October. I have flown long haul with thomson but not thomas cook.

    In your oppinions who would you recomend? i have read many bad things about thomas cooks seats being cramped and the IFE being very old and not working.

    Thanks in advance

    Flew with TC in 2010 to Bridgetown A330, excellent flight, clean plane good crew, as far as in-flight entertainment was ok, didn’t have issues with the on demand IFE, last year flew with Thomson again to Bridgetown, 767 ex First choice, plane was dirty, IFE didn’t work, food was poor and staff were horrendous. I would chose Thomas cook, it’s a shame as Thomson “old Britannia” used to be first class, a real shame.

    in reply to: Bad week for Thomson #485055
    wilag
    Participant

    I think the first was slated for Jan 2011, so I would of thought they should of had a few by now if they were on time!.

    Flew on G-PLJO ex fc 767 late last year to Bridgetown, was very shabby looking inside to say the least, fellow passenger commented that he had found “Amy Johnson’s sandwiches on the seat”

    in reply to: Another 2011 737 at NWI 19/4/11 #492655
    wilag
    Participant

    Hi .. Cheers mate , managed to find a pic of that new thomson sky interior.

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5103/5635385507_8397fc505b_b.jpg
    Thomsons New Sky interior by FlyingAnts, on Flickr

    FlyingAnts

    Ohh I say, that’s a bit posh looking, just unreal to think of the 737 on how long it’s been around can look so fresh and modern.

    in reply to: Bad week for Thomson #485062
    wilag
    Participant

    Just been watching this myself, think there are need now of the 787s. those poor old 76s are tired now.

    in reply to: Another 2011 737 at NWI 19/4/11 #493001
    wilag
    Participant

    I do like the Thomson 737s I believe that the last few delivered have got the new sky interior? has anybody got a pics of it.

    Cracking shots as per normal.

    in reply to: Manchester – 12th April – Jet2 in smart scheme #493405
    wilag
    Participant

    Doesn’t half remind me of the old Airtours color scheme, the sun bit in the tail is very similar?.

    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Airtours-International/Boeing-757-225/1629898/L/&sid=9159f1d2fef209011bcb2c10d08c6e6b

    in reply to: Crikey! #488030
    wilag
    Participant

    Is it true that topless women get free drinks at that bar? 🙂

    Tis true, the wife was paralytic, 😀

    in reply to: Crikey! #488042
    wilag
    Participant

    Very good, I have been Lucky to visit the airport for the past two years running whilst on a p&o cruise, was quire surreal when I first stepped foot seeing all the vids and pic of you tube and such like, cant think of anything better, planes,beech and a cracking bar with all the arrivals for the day, pure heaven.

    http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc312/dreamweaver767/DSCF1989.jpg

    http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc312/dreamweaver767/DSCF1979.jpg

    http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc312/dreamweaver767/DSCF2115.jpg

    http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc312/dreamweaver767/DSCF2113.jpg

    in reply to: Large Post From Norwich …. #502127
    wilag
    Participant

    Top notch as per usual mate, guess the Monarch 757 came out all shiny then, nice to see her still with the original owner, looking might fine at 23 years young. Credit to Monarch engineering I guess.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 562 total)