dark light

AMB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 508 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ARG Vampire Projects #1025766
    AMB
    Participant

    Considering XG743 was only on loan to RAE as a Buccaneer chase aircraft, I doubt if any special scheme was applied. The solid orange dayglo scheme shown here was applied in the early ’60s, around 1961-62 I would guess and the aircraft was operated by RNAS Brawdy’s Station Flight right up until it was retired around 1970 when it went to Kemble for storage, being delivered to Duxford in this scheme in June 1972. Not sure what period it was on loan to RAE, but I would guess it retained this scheme and Brawdy codes as seen here.

    in reply to: ARG Vampire Projects #1039370
    AMB
    Participant

    Considering XG743 was only on loan to RAE as a Buccaneer chase aircraft, I doubt if any special scheme was applied. The solid orange dayglo scheme shown here was applied in the early ’60s, around 1961-62 I would guess and the aircraft was operated by RNAS Brawdy’s Station Flight right up until it was retired around 1970 when it went to Kemble for storage, being delivered to Duxford in this scheme in June 1972. Not sure what period it was on loan to RAE, but I would guess it retained this scheme and Brawdy codes as seen here.

    in reply to: Any news on the HP42 replica's ? #1025780
    AMB
    Participant

    …and perhaps a Beaufighter at Duxford that seems to be going nowhere!

    in reply to: Any news on the HP42 replica's ? #1039379
    AMB
    Participant

    …and perhaps a Beaufighter at Duxford that seems to be going nowhere!

    in reply to: Shuttleworth uncovered 22nd Sept 2012 #1026610
    AMB
    Participant

    The Albatros was flown by a Shuttleworth pilot. Many people didn’t seem to need a close formation to get all four in the frame.

    You asked ‘many people’?? I got all four in the frame, but only in a head-on shot, not a nice formation side-view as hoped and doubt if you did?

    in reply to: Shuttleworth uncovered 22nd Sept 2012 #1040310
    AMB
    Participant

    The Albatros was flown by a Shuttleworth pilot. Many people didn’t seem to need a close formation to get all four in the frame.

    You asked ‘many people’?? I got all four in the frame, but only in a head-on shot, not a nice formation side-view as hoped and doubt if you did?

    AMB
    Participant

    I was at the excellent Shuttleworth event on Saturday and while the RE.8 and Albatros were flying, the announcer clearly said ” Make the most of this, you will never see it again”. I was also told that the RE.8, Albatros and Sopwith Snipe would be dismantled today(25th) and taken to Hendon.

    As for the DH.88 Comet, I photographed it in the workshop with engines dismantled and undercarriage in pieces – no way will it fly on 7th October. I feel sorry for those that have bought tickets already, expecting to see these aircraft, as they will not appear.

    AMB
    Participant

    I was at the excellent Shuttleworth event on Saturday and while the RE.8 and Albatros were flying, the announcer clearly said ” Make the most of this, you will never see it again”. I was also told that the RE.8, Albatros and Sopwith Snipe would be dismantled today(25th) and taken to Hendon.

    As for the DH.88 Comet, I photographed it in the workshop with engines dismantled and undercarriage in pieces – no way will it fly on 7th October. I feel sorry for those that have bought tickets already, expecting to see these aircraft, as they will not appear.

    in reply to: Shuttleworth uncovered 22nd Sept 2012 #1026726
    AMB
    Participant

    The show highlight for me was the Bristol Fighter, SE5A, Albatros, and RE8 in the air together. As always, Shuttleworth did not disappoint.

    That was my only gripe – yes they were in the air together but at no time did they formate together. It was RE.8 & Albatros followed by Bristol Fighter and SE-5A. I suspect Shuttleworth pilots are not allowed close-formating with non-Shuttleworth pilots?

    in reply to: Shuttleworth uncovered 22nd Sept 2012 #1040430
    AMB
    Participant

    The show highlight for me was the Bristol Fighter, SE5A, Albatros, and RE8 in the air together. As always, Shuttleworth did not disappoint.

    That was my only gripe – yes they were in the air together but at no time did they formate together. It was RE.8 & Albatros followed by Bristol Fighter and SE-5A. I suspect Shuttleworth pilots are not allowed close-formating with non-Shuttleworth pilots?

    in reply to: Shuttleworth uncovered 22nd Sept 2012 #1041866
    AMB
    Participant

    Great event and a very surprising one too. The usual ‘do not touch or get too close’ policy went out the door and everyone was trusted to get intimate with these precious machines. A great event held in beautiful weather and very worthwhile attending, not least to see the RE.8 and Albatros fly for the last time and also the RAF Museum’s Sopwith Snipe, which were the stars of this event. Shame the Demon never flew as it was down to fly, but pleased several pilots used this event to get some hours in on various types, so there was plenty of flying during the day.

    Now how about Shuttleworth doing this again, but with the types that never ventured outside the hangars this time?

    in reply to: Berlin So Expensive!? #531810
    AMB
    Participant

    Your company clearly has to economy measures and is probably like mine in that it books through an Agent like Hotelscene, who have deals they do with the airlines which aren’t necessarily the cheapest but they get a cut out of it!

    Go to the Easyjet website and you will see their lowest rate from Gatwick to Berlin is £35.49 !!! Their most expensive return fare is £189.49,so someone needs to seriously address this with whoever is booking your flights as no way would I pay £500 to fly back from Berlin!!!

    in reply to: Crowd barriers in airshow static parks #1045607
    AMB
    Participant

    I think it’s a combination of factors, security, Heath & Safety and cost:

    1. Security – in the ’60s there was not the terrorsim threat there is today so there was little chance that someone would sabotage and aircraft, basically we were indeed trusted more.

    2. The Heath & Safety Act has a lot to answer for! If anyone got injured examining an aircraft at close quarters, there would be claims going in right left and centre!

    3. In the 60s, most aircraft were ‘roped off’ if there were operational, although at USAFE Armed Forces Days, they never seemed to have any barriers right up until they finished. The production and cost of hiring in metal barriers must be horrendous and they only really came in after the ’60s.

    The best solution, although photographers hate them, is to use cones such as at RIAT and place security personal at strategic locations to ensure no one steps over them.

    in reply to: New Comet Web Site #1048220
    AMB
    Participant

    Great to see this finally making progress. I recall seeing “Black Magic” as a ‘basket case’ at Staverton/Gloucestershire Airport several years ago, but it all went very quiet afterwards despite the group’s enthusiasm to rebuild her.

    in reply to: Falklands Wessex paint codes #1048227
    AMB
    Participant

    Pity it has to be in the Falklands scheme as I always prefered the earlier sand and spinach camouflage colours worn in the ’60s

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 508 total)