Is this museum which has a unique Polikarpov I-16 UTI ?
Thanks all for your replies 🙂
It would be nice to get a pic of this F-5E at this museum, as this Tiger looks to have a very nice color scheme.
No, it’s a standard two-tones dark green Storch, with a swatiska on the tail.
I recorded quite big pictures of this aircraft, but as already said lost it in the HD crash ! I remember the pictures had been taken under a grey sky.
Hi all,
Can someone help me ? 😉
I’ve had a PC crash and I lost some of my files of the past three months, and, in the circumstances, some pictures of a very recently restored Fi-156.
This aircraft wears a Luftwaffe green camo, it’s painted with a swatiska on the tail.
I’ve searched for it on some of my usual aviation forums, but found nothing !
So, any help, greatly appreciated.
What a beauty in its matte black, stunning !!!
And looking at the engine cowl, I do hope it will inspire some plastic kits producer to make a correct F4U-5.
Yes for sure ! Correct cowl, correct position of the exhausts but no wingtip radome. We have some pictures where you can see the bird without (!!) wingtip radome, so everything is perfect. I cant wait the rollout on Friday …
Hiha:D, just great, as some kind of symetry obsessed guy on aircrafts or cars, this is just great !!!
Btw, the Corsair just looks amazing in its black livery with red markings.
Congrats to the owner and the team for this choice !
Thanks Mathias for your quick and extensive answer 🙂
Interesting, a very clever alternate way to cool the engine !
A question which interests me for a long time : are the shapes of the Flugwerk 190A engine and guns cowlings different from the real 190A for some mechanical reasons, because of the different engine ?
“We use commonsense instead.”
Great, you are lucky to live there, in this beautiful country.
We used to be like that too, in Switzerland, until a few years ago.
Now, it’s almost finished, as our society is getting changed very fast 🙁
P.S. if the owner of this Venom repaints one day his aircraft and still wants to keep a colorful scheme, he should try a “Lindi” 😀
“…well plus the knowledge for the future of our Aerospace Industry ?…”
Without forgetting the F-35 as a mass destruction weapon against European defence industry.
It reminds me of someone saying something about a nation “building its own funeral pyre” !
Yep, you must choose : either to keep an airforce or to fight the US wars, but both, not possible in the current economy. Sad but true.
There are many paradoxes in this discussion.
People defending strongly the RAF actions against Dresden defend it because of a nationalist feeling, which is in reality not very different that what they actually reproach to the Germans of that time.
Also, the argument for bombing Dresden is because the German government of that time was evil (of course, it was, evil), but killing civilians in masses is also by nature an evil action. By the way, Churchill who ordered the Dresden bombings is also the man who organized the gas bombing of Iraki villages, killing this way many civilians too, so it’s not so easy to say “we are the good guys, the others ones are the bad ones”, it’s much more different levels of bad, instead of a clear separation of good and bad.
Just curious, as I don’t really know this subject, who began first to bomb civilian areas, Germany or Great Britain ?
Wikipedia extract is not very clear on this question :
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Targeting cities and civilians was viewed as a psychological weapon to break the enemy’s will to fight. From 1940–1941, Germany used this weapon in its ‘Blitz’ against Britain.[9] From 1940 onward, the intensity of the British bombing campaign against Germany became less restrictive, increasingly targeting industrial sites and eventually, civilian areas…
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_bombing_during_World_War_II
Towards the end of the war, the winning nations began to realize there were netherless some political problems with the fact of killing civilians without any real clear military reasons. Frankly, one could ask : “why killing civilans on the ground is a war crime, while killing civilians from the air is ok ?” or “arent’ we supposed to be the good guys of the story ?”
Look at this document :
