H_K posted this interesting link
http://pogoarchives.org/labyrinth/09/08.pdfno need to read all 159 pages, he basically says:
F-86: whoops the derriere of all century fighters, only F-5 comes close
F-104: great aircraft except for crappy turning. could’ve been best fighter until the 1970s
Mirage III: like F-104 with poorer thrust and less acceleration. French engine sucks. With a J79, could’ve been like a half size F-106 or a F-104 thats more balanced
F-5: most effective a2a aircraft in 60s to early 70s, could generate more sorties than f-16s. problem is poor visibility and acceleration. combat persistence on par with F-15A. F-14 and F-15 can’t convcingly dominate the F-5 still. F-5 still has problems with F-86
Kfir: Mirage III with J79 but got too heavy and sucks
Draken: better acceleration than Mirage III, F-4, and F-100. great maximum turn rate since F-86, better dog fighter than century fighters and even F-14. Swedes regret getting Viggen. F-16s have a hard time with the Draken. its only flaw is the Falcon fcs and missile.
F-16: could’ve been great until they added multi-role features and made it fat. one F-16 may not be able to defeat as many enemies as 6 F-5s (sortie issue mentioned above). Still, can kill as well as the F-15
His opinions on BVR combat are likely out-of-date and the last gun kill was in 1999 (Ethiopian-Eritrean War) and before that probably Falklands War if you discount the A-10’s helicopter kills in Desert Storm. He does make good points about quantity, availability and operating costs though.
From SK’s point of view, if they’re fighting J-20s and J-31s from China, the F-35 is stuffed anyway and so is their military without US help. If they’re fighting NK, then the Eurofighter is more than adequate, or will be once it gets all its A-G weapons, which will be before SK is ever likely to get an F-35.
^Now that’s interesting.
Your nonsense remark aside. The RCS peaks decide over the radar-detection-range of something. Some treatment to lower the critical ones will half the detection range and it will be done when worth it. The second gain is lowering the work-load of your jammer or more penetration range obscured f.e.. Here the practical gains are the cost limit. Every half in detection range demanded a ten-times better RCS. The main contributer to RCS peaks is not the size but the rotating elements. Some RAM treatment to the inlets of the Tornado f.e. did reduce such critical peak.
Oh I know the theory and to half detection range requires reducing RCS by a factor of 16. The problem is that the F-15 had a damn large RCS to begin with. Reduce RCS by a factor of 10 and you’re still over 1m^2. Reduce it by another factor of 10 and your RCS is still bigger than that of an F-18E/F and 100 times that of an F-35. If Boeing had said that the RCS is comparable to an F-18E/F then their statement might have been plausible. If the RCS was really comparable to an F-35 then everyone would drop the F-35A and buy an F-15SE instead because, God knows, the performance is a lot better.
Eh? Why would it be so unstealthy?
Internal payload, canted tail, early engine stages worked over for LO, RAM treated airframe with increased composite content. No chines though. Boeing claims (probably with some exaggeration that it compares to the F-35 in the forward sector).
I guess it should apply this RAM treatment to a B-52 and make it like a B-2 then.
Is an F-35B a match for the J-20?
Israel’s main tool of spanking Arab aircraft was with Mirages, that was until 1967 when CdG placed an embargo on them, forcing them to make Neshers, Kfirs, and into the arms of Uncle Sam’s succulent breasts.
but what if he never placed the embargo (or if Pompidou lifted it after CdG left)..
how would the IAF be different during the wars after 1967.. how would international relations be different?
Europe would be the focus of international terrorism instead of the US.
i know, and i do not deny them, i simply would like to have raw datas, how they have been collected, computed etc. Professional deformation i guess π
Nah guesswork is better. Call it a round $50k and we’ll put aside anything spare for a Christmas do.
http://publicintelligence.net/u-s-navy-natops-f-14-tomcat-flight-manuals/
http://www.scribd.com/doc/39906505/F-15-Strike-Eagle
http://publicintelligence.net/u-s-air-force-f-16ab-flight-manual/
http://publicintelligence.net/u-s-navy-f-18-natops-flight-manuals/
http://publicintelligence.net/u-s-navy-natops-av-8b-harrier-ii-flight-manuals/
US Navy provides heavy resistance to moving goal-posts and the focus on counter-terrorism role.

CAPITOL HILL: A bipartisan letter to Navy Secretary Ray Mabus argues that the Navy should reexamine the approach itβs taking to the stealthy carrier-based Unmanned Aerial System known as UCLASS.
UCLASS letter fm Forbes to Sec. Mabus 9-17-2013
Reps. Randy Forbes and Mike McIntyre, the chairman and ranking members of the House Armed Services seapower and projection forces subcommittee, urge Mabus in the Sept. 17 letter to make sure the aircraft β the next step from the X-47B β are designed to be part of a carrier air wing, projecting power as part of the carrier group. Some on Capitol Hill and in the Navy fear that senior Pentagon officials are eager to turn UCLASS into a counter-terrorism tool, sort of a super Predator.
If it turned out to be a high-endurance weapon with minimal payload, then one Hill staffer said, βit wouldnβt really be the UCLASS we want it to be.β
The UK used to build great transports and airliners like the Shorts Belfast, Andover, Vickers VC10, etc
now all you really have is the BAe 146
the UK let their civlian/military transport industry die only to rely imports from the Yanks and worse, the French.
yet the Brazilians, Japanese, Indians, etc are trying to build their own transports, at least short and medium sized ones..
should the Brits get back into the game?
Sad to see the VC10 go. Very ahead of its time. Still holds the record for the fastest subsonic airliner crossing of the Atlantic. BAE really screwed up by selling their stake in AIRBUS though. Some dummy wanted to provide a higher return for shareholders one year, so they sacrificed the company’s diversity and future profits to turn a fast buck.
So lets just buy more transport crafts to air drop launchers π
BTW : From your Link…THis is NICE..
Going to be added to the LCS apparently because at present it lacks teeth.
It is capable, but I am quite sure it cannot take off on its own and need delivery π
http://defense-update.com/20121207_fire-support.html

The conceptual Ground Launched Small Diameter Bomb (GL-SDB) will utilize the MLRS rocket to boost the SDB to a trajectory from where it will be able to continue gliding to its target like it was dropped from a manned aircraft.
That doesn’t explain issues in Kosovo where combo was bad weather + bad terrain + relatively functional IADS that forced higher altitude tactics.
Lasers don’t pass through clouds well and FLIR/LITENING pods can’t see through them either. Millimetric Wave Radar and SAR don’t have those problems.
Here’s another report on Desert Storm from nearer the time.
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA235941&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf
And ‘tank plinking’.
http://www.airforcemag.com/MagazineArchive/Pages/1993/October%201993/1093plinking.aspx
The best performing aircraft was probably the F-111F.
20 years ago was also the year of Intel 386 CPU, DOS, and 64 kB graphics,
my 50 buck wristwatch is better
Too bad. I had a Commodore Amiga 500 27 years ago but Pershing II RADAC could home in on bunkers at Mach 10 when we were all playing PAC Man on ZX Spectrums.