Yes I have seen that so it should be easy for the poster, journalists etc, to take images of the location and match them exactly with the location in the video. Anyone can make such a claim but it needs to be confirmed with photographic proof otherwise it just ends up as yet another counter claim. I checked on the google maps but that area is not covered by ground images.

Well, this is the problem because it’s really just a claim in the first case. It’s a blog, not an official news channel. There is no proof of time or location. For all anyone knows that video was shot 2 years ago after a military exercise, or it’s a Ukrainian battery.

This is an example of some people naively falling for the claims of the crazy die-hard conspiracy theorists and their You Tube compilations. The reality is that the day behind time stamp error is due to the YouTube encoding servers being behind by 1 day at that time.

Seems to me that it’s more a case of YouTube adopting retarded time stamping policies and people making what would otherwise be logical judgements, were it not for YouTube’s idiocy.

http://www.defencetalk.com/ukrainian-buk-battery-radar-was-operational-when-malaysian-plane-downed-60196/

On Thursday, when a Malaysian Airlines plane was apparently shot down over Ukraine, a Ukrainian Buk anti-aircraft missile battery was operational in the region, the Russian Defense Ministry said, contradicting Kiev’s statements.

The battery was deployed at a site from which it could have fired a missile at the airliner, the ministry said in a statement. It said radiation from the battery’s radar was detected by the Russian military.

“The Russian equipment detected throughout July 17 the activity of a Kupol radar, deployed as part of a Buk-M1 battery near Styla [a village some 30km south of Donetsk],” the ministry said in a statement.

I personally think Ukrainian ATC set this airliner up to fail looking at the map. In the absence of a MALD, they used a 777 and told it to fly very close to an airport that was being fought over, where paras had previously landed.

In that respect, it doesn’t matter who actually fired the missile.

Stop apologizing for Putin murderer.

Silly girl.

See following with truck and trailer claimed to have transported the Buk in and out of Ukraine.

http://ukraineatwar.blogspot.nl/2014/07/russian-transport-of-buk-into-ukraine.html

http://ukraineatwar.blogspot.nl/2014/07/russian-transport-of-buk-that-shot-down.html

[ATTACH=CONFIG]230309[/ATTACH]

So was that the one that shot down the An-26 or the 777? Time and date is very important. Time legitimate? Location legimate?

Did it have 4 missiles in the first place?

It is a blog spot, not official news.

Take a look at the following picture.. could that huge hole punched into the structure be compelling evidence of a missile hit?

Looks like a smaller missile if it was. 70kg HE (Buk) would surely make a larger hole. I mean some anti-ship missiles, like MARTE, only have 70kg warheads.

You would have to ask, how the hell can anyone possibly know that a Buk shot it down? They don’t even know who fired it yet. Almost as soon as ‘SAM’ was heard, ‘Buk’ was heard too.

This is what a 74kg warhead does (1:08):

Putin owns this crisis. ALOT of blood on his Facist hands.

Oh sure. It was Putin who forced Ukraine to decide between EU and Russian trade. It was Putin who shot people with hunting rifle bullets in the February protests. It was Putin who removed Russian and Greek as official languages following the takeover and Putin who killed twice as many civilians in Eastern Ukraine as were on this plane. Does it not strike you as massively odd the amount of support the new bunch got straight away before there was even an election, how the richest person in Ukraine became president, how western media coverage of deaths in Eastern Ukraine has been negligible?

If you really don’t have a clue about the world, just stick to aviation.