dark light

Hyperwarp

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 2,921 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 'Unique' looking warbirds #2470383
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    A/C which entered service?

    What about the B-2?

    As well as the Su-34

    in reply to: 'Unique' looking warbirds #2470393
    Hyperwarp
    Participant
    in reply to: SU-35 , how will it sell? #2470396
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    Lol star49 – you’re a funny bunny 🙂 – most of what you claim is so hilarious! I don’t know if you get a kick out of talking rubbish or if you actually believe most of your claims. 🙂 🙂

    How dare you say such things to our most repeatable member, not only at AFM but the entire W-W-W.

    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Personal/Smilies/Fight/h035.gif

    Rocket engines – are technically jet engines :). Ramjet is technically a jet engine!

    Like the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory?

    in reply to: The best aircraft to chase UFO #2470403
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    Proven against UFOs

    [IMG-r]http://images.wikia.com/stargate/images/f/f7/X-302.jpg%5B/IMG]

    Ahh…… The F-302 prototype….:)

    Has proved itself against ‘gliders’ but according to the briefing by O’neill (with 2 ‘L’s :D), even it is not as fast and maneuverable as the glider (let along the Ori fighter IMHO).

    One interesting things about it is its naquadria hyperdrive. Remember it was used to bypass Anubis’s shields…?

    Plus, F-15, F-16, MiG-29 have taken down gliders and Al’kesh too… but are overwhelmed quickly..

    in reply to: F-15, F-16, F-14, Su-27 and MiG-29 aerodynamics #2470407
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    Hmm that seems rather too quick, but if you have seen some of the early
    su-27 demo flights flown at farnborough/le bourget ,a min radius/max rate turn was included and it was around 12 seconds for 360 deg.

    Try this vid at 5:02

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M-ByZ0pBjQ

    Obviously its nothing accurate, just gives a represention, general idea of the ability.

    oh…and

    interesting maneuvers there at 1:45+ and 4:00+…

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2069744
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    to RSM55:

    interesting info there… keep’em coming

    PS:

    I know this is not the thread for this, but anything new on the PAK-FA?

    in reply to: F-15, F-16, F-14, Su-27 and MiG-29 aerodynamics #2470704
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    Hmm that seems rather too quick, but if you have seen some of the early
    su-27 demo flights flown at farnborough/le bourget ,a min radius/max rate turn was included and it was around 12 seconds for 360 deg.

    Try this vid at 5:02

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M-ByZ0pBjQ

    Obviously its nothing accurate, just gives a represention, general idea of the ability.

    woooaaaaawwwiii…

    thanx a million for posting that…

    flv ripping time :diablo::dev2:

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2470717
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    Surely you would have learnt by now that replying to certain members is just an exercise in futility? No need to feed the trolls, they are only desperate for attention, just don’t give it to them and they will eventually get bored and go bother some other poor souls.

    haha…… how true…:D

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2470988
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    Although not related but it put final nail in the claim that China itself put several tons antenna over the top of IL-76 couple of years ago which is much more complex aerodynamically which Brits/Israelis refused to do it.
    http://blogs.wsj.com/chinajournal/2008/09/18/chinas-flying-phoenix-stalls-before-take-off/?mod=googlenews_wsj
    China’s ‘Flying Phoenix’ Stalls Before Take-Off

    WOW!

    ARJ21 ‘Flying Phoenix’ = Ilyushin-76? Transformers are real…. Great news….

    in reply to: PLAAF News, Photos and Speculation #12 #2471579
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    From xinhui @ CDF:

    Olympic security command…

    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Hobbies/Military/PRC/Air/KJ-2000/post-131-1221957706xinhui.jpg

    in reply to: SU-35 , how will it sell? #2471583
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    One question here. If EF2000 really has such good TWR, why does it seem so sluggish? Seen few performances of this bird, simply terribly disappointing, even less maneuvrable than F-18.

    :confused: Hmm….. I must say I am quite surprised that post came from you…

    I don’t know if you have seen an EF live flex – but it hardly seems sluggish to me at an airshow. I prefer its display to the F/A-18E/F. But thats perhaps because I’m personally not that impressed by high alpha performance. But rather transitioning seemlessly from maneuver to maneuver.

    I actually saw the EF way back in 96 and 98. 96 it was really sluggish and the Rafale seem much better, much smoother (But all that was massively overshadowed by a ‘Terminator’ in the sky :D. You have one guess :p). Completely different in 98. Wow… the EF really threw itself and had lot of energy. And it seemed the difference was because in 96 it didn’t have the EJ. But EF demos after than go more and more conservative. But after 98 never saw it (or any other 4/4.5 gen a/c for that matter) live. Just internet videos.

    But whatever the aircraft, can their maneuverability be judged on airshow stunts alone? Particularly, sustained high-speed, high-G at altitudes beyond the naked eye? I am not an aeronautical engineer but if the F-22 did her airshow stunts in a real battle, floating around it’d probably have an ASRAAM shoved up its rear end?

    in reply to: General Discussion #318399
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Personal/Smilies/Greet/sign0016-1.gif

    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Personal/Smilies/Greet/sign0140.gif

    in reply to: Greetings #1899642
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Personal/Smilies/Greet/sign0016-1.gif

    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Personal/Smilies/Greet/sign0140.gif

    in reply to: AIM-9X Block II? #1785320
    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    They took a page out of the ASRAAMs book it seems. IIRC its slated for integration in 2012 if funding goes the F-22s way – in increment 3.2.

    If? :confused:

    No other missile in the world will match
    the AIM-9X Block II in range, maneuverability, off-boresight capability and
    speed.”

    Sounds like: Older AIM-9X, ASRAAM, Python-5, A-Darter, MICA-IR all put into one.

    AIM-9X was said to have 60 g’s maybe now it 100 g’s (I read few years back that the A-Darter hit 100 g’s at one point)

    Does the “AIM-9X Block II” even classify as a WVR weapon? We still don’t know the exact range of the older AIM-9X

    Hyperwarp
    Participant

    The PAKFA designed to neutralize the F-22.
    F-22 Raptor was not an unattainable new tech fighter but integrated many special techs that had been used before to it own.

    Thread title: “Upgraded MiG-31 to be formidable rival for fifth gen fighters:Commander Mikhailov”

    I guess “manson_322” and the gang know more than the RuAF? :rolleyes: RuAF must be stupid going for the PAK-FA and even MiG is now looking towards the “LMFS”. I mean there is super-duper upgraded MiG-31…..:rolleyes:

    Russians seem to be firing on all cylinders for the “PAK-FA”. Their biggest fighter project in decades I believe…

    http://www.ato.ru/rus/cis/archive/17-2007/def/def3/
    http://www.ato.ru/rus/cis/archive/15-2006/def/def1/

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 2,921 total)