dark light

T5

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,101 through 5,115 (of 6,450 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The 7E7 versus the A380 :: You Decide! #660533
    T5
    Participant

    They are not released too close to one another, but since these are the only relatively big plans for these giant manufacturers, I thought I’d ask.

    The first A380 is due in 2006 (I think) with the 7E7 not taking orders until next year, being rolled out 4 years later in 2008.

    in reply to: Pic Of The Day-B747 #660718
    T5
    Participant

    w o n d e r f u l !

    in reply to: A330 Compared JMC v MyTravel #660729
    T5
    Participant

    Originally posted by A330Crazy
    Though yes I did find the seating arrangement quite crampped

    I think cramped seating arrangements is typical of most charter airlines and I do not believe they take the comfort of their passengers into consideration when putting the seats onto an aircraft – I think with DVT risks in recent years, charters should be forced to remove rows to allow for extra leg room.

    Back to the A330 topic.

    I have flown the Airtours A330 as some of you will know. I flew to Montego Bay, Jamaica from London Gatwick (G-MLJL), a flight which lasted 5 minutes off of being 10 hours – that’s right, 9h 55mins! 😀

    I loved everything about the aircraft apart from the legroom. Your own personal TV, two cameras outside the aircraft which could be viewed on your TV, toilets beneath the passenger cabin and more.

    I’ve only flown JMC once in my life and that was in 2000, in the pre-A330 days when the DC-10-30s had to fly the long haul routes. I found their crew to be quite rude and full of useless ideas. I mentioned a headphone incident in my flight report where the headphone socket wasn’t working. One of the stewardesses suggested my mother and I took turns in using her socket. We couldn’t both listen to the entertainment at the same time – no apology, nothing!

    I liked the Airtours aircraft and crew, they were both brilliant and constantly had a smile on their face for the long haul flight across the pond. Nothing was too much for them.

    in reply to: The 7E7 versus the A380 :: You Decide! #660734
    T5
    Participant

    As far as I know, it’s not meant to be a replacement, it’s just slightly cheaper to run than the 767-300 which is near enough the same size.

    in reply to: Funny story I though may give you a laugh. #660955
    T5
    Participant

    I think there are two sides to every argument – yes, it seems a little extreme to offload three passengers because of a mischievous child, but to refuse travel on a later flight is crazy!

    I thought that the Cabin Crew had to ensure the passengers were seated before the aircraft even pushed back from it’s stand, so trying to solve the problem at the last possible minute as they taxi to the runway isn’t going to work!

    I can almost feel the tension though – three cabin crew and a toddler not strapped in for takeoff which is getting ever closer. When I returned from New York in November with my family, my sister had a bad stomach and had to go to the toilet minutes before landing. The seatbelt sign had just “pinged” on and she was nowhere to be seen. The aircraft was making quite steeps turns as it neared Heathrow. Finally, she emerged from the loo 3 or 4 minutes from landing and the stressed crew suddenly looked relieved.

    in reply to: Pic of the Mo #660960
    T5
    Participant

    Was that aircraft ever painted in MYT colour scheme?

    in reply to: NorthWest DC10's #661133
    T5
    Participant

    It was in 1971 that Northwest started to fly the McDonnell Douglas DC10 series.

    They have operated 11 DC10-30s and 21 DC10-40s, but I’m not sure how many have now been withdrawn from service.

    The replacement for the DC10 is the 757-300.

    in reply to: NorthWest DC10's #661143
    T5
    Participant

    Northwest’s DC10s are a 2-5-2 seating configuration in economy. For cabin shots of their DC10 aircraft, click the following links:

    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/322809/M/
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/125428/M/
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/073547/M/
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/073546/M/
    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/012750/M/

    Do check the comments though, some of these shots are of their first class cabin.

    As for the current DC10 fleet for Northwest, I couldn’t help I’m afraid!

    in reply to: Breaking News… New budget airline based at Luton. #661352
    T5
    Participant

    I think this sounds promising.

    Linking it to Kabir’s low cost topic and what I said in that, I think this airline has played the game properly. Although they are flying from Luton, they are not flying easyJet’s routes and still stick to major destinations.

    in reply to: Why is the low cost revolution stuck at one place? #661356
    T5
    Participant

    I don’t think it’s possible to move into a new stage of low cost air travel, certainly not in the UK anyway.

    Low cost airlines are being set up on what could almost be said to be a daily basis… that’s how frequent these things are! I just don’t think any new airlines setting up from now onwards stand a chance for a number of reasons:

    1. Where is the airline’s hub?

    Is this airport easy to get to? By car and public transport?

    Do other low cost airlines operate from this airport?

    2. Where does the airline fly to?

    Do other airlines fly the same route?

    If a new low cost airline was to start operations from an easy-to-reach airport, one which isn’t used by other low cost carriers and then flys to a variety of destinations across the continent or maybe even further afield (similar to what the non-existent Sky Bus plans on doing), routes which are in high demand, they’ll be a success, surely – Is there such a thing?

    If you plan to set up an airline at London Luton say, and you plan to fly to Barcelona, Palma and Geneva for example… you can wave your future as a low cost airline goodbye. Competition with easyJet would be impossible. They have hubs in London and Geneva and are known by lots of people. Their flights are operated more frequently, giving the travellers a whole lot more choice as to when they can travel because they are such a large airline with an even larger fleet and their prices are competitive!

    The point that I am trying to make is that there is no room for more low cost carriers in the UK. Any new airlines wanting to start up would need to be based at an airport which does not currently offer low cost flights and fly to destinations which cannot be reached from that airport.

    in reply to: General Discussion #375903
    T5
    Participant

    I think that amongts youngsters, how cool you are all depends on your model of phone.

    A brick is a chunky phone that doesn’t fit into your pocket, the sort that at one stage in life, was super-cool. You are a cool dude(!!) if you have a tiny phone with a colour screen and a built in camera.

    But as long as it does the job, then why change? I have a Samsung T100 on contract, so the handset was only £25 and I pay £15 a month but get 12 hours of calls. I’d never even consider forking out £450.00 on a mobile and definitely not a Nokia. Their phones change far too frequently for my liking!

    in reply to: re recomendation re mobil phones #1960150
    T5
    Participant

    I think that amongts youngsters, how cool you are all depends on your model of phone.

    A brick is a chunky phone that doesn’t fit into your pocket, the sort that at one stage in life, was super-cool. You are a cool dude(!!) if you have a tiny phone with a colour screen and a built in camera.

    But as long as it does the job, then why change? I have a Samsung T100 on contract, so the handset was only £25 and I pay £15 a month but get 12 hours of calls. I’d never even consider forking out £450.00 on a mobile and definitely not a Nokia. Their phones change far too frequently for my liking!

    in reply to: summer vacation in N Europe #1960160
    T5
    Participant

    The British Climate is a strange one.. warm-ish summers and often very cold, wet winters.

    Regardless of the season though, there’s always rain and it’s always nice to escape the dreadful weather for just a week or two.

    However, when it gets hot, it’s nice. I’ve not had a holiday in my own country since 1996, but when the sun shines and their isn’t a cloud in sight, Britain can be wonderful.

    At the Farnborough Air Show last year, I remember the sun and blue sky and temperatures nearly reaching 30 degrees (27 or 28).

    When you go abroad from the UK, you are almost guaranteed wonderful weather. In this country, you cannot even rely on the likes of Michael Fish to guarantee good weather.

    Plus.. our sea is F R E E Z I N G all year round!

    in reply to: General Discussion #375913
    T5
    Participant

    The British Climate is a strange one.. warm-ish summers and often very cold, wet winters.

    Regardless of the season though, there’s always rain and it’s always nice to escape the dreadful weather for just a week or two.

    However, when it gets hot, it’s nice. I’ve not had a holiday in my own country since 1996, but when the sun shines and their isn’t a cloud in sight, Britain can be wonderful.

    At the Farnborough Air Show last year, I remember the sun and blue sky and temperatures nearly reaching 30 degrees (27 or 28).

    When you go abroad from the UK, you are almost guaranteed wonderful weather. In this country, you cannot even rely on the likes of Michael Fish to guarantee good weather.

    Plus.. our sea is F R E E Z I N G all year round!

    in reply to: Why is the low cost revolution stuck at one place? #661369
    T5
    Participant

    There are too many low cost carriers in Europe especially and I think it’s obvious that less than half of these will actually make it big – like easyJet.

    I think any low cost carrier being set up now is taking a huge risk. There is a lot which could be lost financially, competing with the largest low cost airlines in my opinion – Ryanair and easyJet.

    However, airlines such as Jet2 do stand a chance as far as I’m concerned. Operating from Leeds Bradford, not a major airport (if at all) for low cost flights.

    Mama Air was all ready to go then flopped, taking a turn for the worst with the project never taking off! Perhaps their choice of hub was never the best anyway.

    Too many low cost carriers, regardless of where in the world it is, is a crazy idea. The smaller airlines will just be forced to cease operations after a while because they cannot compete with the long-established and more well-known airlines.

Viewing 15 posts - 5,101 through 5,115 (of 6,450 total)