dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2220233
    halloweene
    Participant

    So it’s all internal but it can be used for more than just the “defensive” ECM your typical internal ESM suites is built for? Are there plans for “cooperative” EW?

    Yes, there is a study plan called Tragedac so as to share sensors data in a sigle patrol.Purely defensive although.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2220839
    halloweene
    Participant

    BIO- interesting video

    I thought one of the more telling exchanges occurred when the gentleman asked about the air to air weapons available to the F-35, there was considerable hedging in the answers considering the kinematics of the AIM-120. It is clear that there is an internal discussion going on as to the suitability of the AMRAAM as the principal air dominance weapon moving forward. This brings up a slew of questions as to how the defense industry is going to solve the question of improving the kinematics of the next generation of air to air weapons considering the space limitations on the F-22, and to a lesser extent the F-35. Anything larger than an AMRAAM sized missile is going to impact the number of missiles carried. Consider that the F-22 could only fit four AIM-120 until the clipped wing variant, and I don’t believe there has been a fit check on the suitability of the Meteor on the air to air station of the F-35 (hinting at a limitation on the size of weapon that station can carry). Clearly, if there is going to to be an increase in range/ and or/ burn time on the next ten air dominance weapon, it is going to have to have a HTK capability similar to the CUDA to fit a larger motor or ramjet in an AMRAAM sized airframe.

    Apparently Meteor should be intgrated on F-35

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2220936
    halloweene
    Participant

    stoped listening when i hear Gen 3 and Gen 5 airplane at around 30 seconds.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2220941
    halloweene
    Participant

    Don’t be ridiculous, please.

    Rapport de la Sous-commission TTE de la Commission de la politique de sécurité du 20 août 2012

    VERY intersting report, thanks!
    Clearly says that low cost otion was chosen.

    And now Thomas urter, after what he said on phone is reliable?

    Besides in conclusions, impact of E/F version is stated as “not sufficiently precise”.

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2221023
    halloweene
    Participant

    I’m not talking about an armasuisse report (they weren’t all leaked, remember?), but I’m referring to the security commission report.
    Ctrl-F “enorme” -> Section 4.4.3.

    I guess you mean those reports made AFTER selection by a politic comittee?
    “The not all linked argument is pretty faint, no?”

    i dont deny that a single engine opearations costs should be lower than a twin engined, but enourmous so much look like a political argument…

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2221064
    halloweene
    Participant

    That’s in the security commission report, that you have already carefully read (right? :dev2: ).

    Yes but i’m ready to learn where it is in armasuisse report

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2221122
    halloweene
    Participant

    Absolutely.
    @rcolistete. The Swiss reports also says the operating costs of the evaluated aircraft show an “enormous difference” – I let you choose a definition of “enormous” (hint: probably “bigger than big”).

    Where in the report? I’m curious :dev2:

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2221505
    halloweene
    Participant

    Thöresson has just been more or less sacked, will be replaced in september…

    in reply to: Taranis update and FCAS planning for the future #2221507
    halloweene
    Participant

    Highly probable.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2222097
    halloweene
    Participant

    A little bird told me : Spectra 5T will have L and VHF band intelligent jamming capabilities….

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2222605
    halloweene
    Participant

    personally i think its to help Stormshadow carriage as much as anything else, and that is looming as far as the UK is concerned.

    Absolutely.To use stormshadow on shoulder point, EFT qould need 3-D thrust vectoring. So they need to use wet points and CFTs are a necessary (and positive) add on.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2222754
    halloweene
    Participant

    Too many decades btw…

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2223055
    halloweene
    Participant

    A penguin..You surely can come up with something better than that 🙂

    YES! 🙂

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTZP02g8oHYFc0JjpH7kQcqFga-D5BMFEOpojc3rhvgIPJ6pK7V

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2223108
    halloweene
    Participant

    Can anyone explain me what a shot between a lightining and a penguin are doing on Rafale thread?

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (3) #2223120
    halloweene
    Participant

    I never said you based your Research on his article, sorry if it came across as that, what I meant was that ” here’s a quote from an article” :). I only used the JPO quote from the article to show what the office had to say about the apparent discrepancy between the bogdan prediction (80-85 million) and the budget documents. Apparently the JPO head thinks they can save money over and above what is budgeted.

    Giovanni is a honest person, why not tell him directly what you think?

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 4,136 total)