dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,976 through 3,990 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rumoir: Greece to lease Atlantique 2s? #2311353
    halloweene
    Participant

    Why not so? Acoustic Atlantique 2 system is way ahead of Orion’s anw (see Malaysian tests…)

    in reply to: AASM vs. PGM #1790575
    halloweene
    Participant

    Any weapon that is GPS guided are vunerable to be jammed these days . This is probably the Achilee’s heel of AASM which for some strange reasons manufacturers here in the US are un willing to address.

    You mean the very same manufacturers that completely missed the “ramjet gen” missiles?

    in reply to: What does JAS-39 offer over F/A-18 or F-16? #2311470
    halloweene
    Participant

    Gripen E/F will use scattered conformal broadband antennas. Accurancy not public.

    Really?

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2314975
    halloweene
    Participant

    Woncering, is this a F35 thread? :):)

    halloweene
    Participant

    No SAAB wont, they’re hooked in NeuroN devs…

    in reply to: F-4E vs. Mirage F-1CT #2314986
    halloweene
    Participant

    But with a WAY larger RCS…
    We’re turning around…

    in reply to: General UCAV/UAV discussion – A New Hope #2315028
    halloweene
    Participant

    A video of the second Phantom Eye Flight :

    http://www.boeing.com/Features/2013/02/bds_phantom_eye_02_26_13.html

    I love that one…

    in reply to: MPAs – P3, Atlantique, Nimrod #2315031
    halloweene
    Participant

    Cherry Ripe: don’t forget that Atlantique is still in service.

    And doing fine job in Mali, incluuding Wescam turret added…

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News and Updates #2315036
    halloweene
    Participant

    Wondering what would prevent them form so… Captor is a fairly efficient radar, and those weapons were integrated to T1 no? Or am i fully wrong? Help Scorpion!

    in reply to: F-4E vs. Mirage F-1CT #2315069
    halloweene
    Participant

    I have a stupid question…
    F4E vs F1CT ok, but latest german F4 vs F2000 isnt a bit diff?

    in reply to: MPAs – P3, Atlantique, Nimrod #2315082
    halloweene
    Participant

    .Will send a personal request to former Atlantique 2 head engineer to see if he wanna say something

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2315100
    halloweene
    Participant

    If we start using that barometer, there may not be anyone left for the US to buy weapons from 🙂 …

    /troll mode on

    Buy Dassault products

    /troll mode off

    in reply to: General UCAV/UAV discussion – A New Hope #2315224
    halloweene
    Participant

    The RAF uses Hellfire on Reapers too. Looks a bit like someone decided that adding a couple of GBU-24s or similar to the standard reaper load sounded nice — so not that left-field, though it seems like an impossibly heavy load to fit in the internal bays of a supposedly 8000kg MTOW vehicle.

    Despite earlier claims of Taranis being a dogfight-capable drone, no mention of a2a weapons. Possibly a hint they’ve decided that was a little too ambitious at this stage.

    Technology demonstrator, certainly. Proof of concept? Maybe a little more. BAE seem eager to talk up Taranis as Britain’s Tornado replacement, though the first goal for the project will be to persuade the RAF that drones can actually do that job. More EAP than Replica I think, at least.

    I think we’ll know a little more when the 450 Meuros given to BAE and Dassault in order to study EFCAS project will have been spent…

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2315227
    halloweene
    Participant

    That is the essence of the discussion. If their is overall superiority in Network reach, and quality then even a force equipped with the F-16 can handle an equal force of F-35’s.

    Which is (i’m also talking about some posts above) a major concern for participants countries. F35 may be a plane that suits US need, but not necessarily all participants as heavily relying on US support “on battleground” therefore leading to even more dependancy to US.

    in reply to: AASM vs. PGM #1790587
    halloweene
    Participant

    What makes AASM unique is its low level release – rocket enabled pop up capability and off flightpath / boresite attack capability. Don’t see anything similar with PGM 500 which is more like on of those Israeli dumb to smart and range extension kits.

    Absolutely agree. In the end, AASM (specially with tri seeker incoming according to Air&Cosmos) main strength is its versatility. Main weak point being price. All n all, far from a “niche ” weapon as advertised by a well reknown journalist on some places :dev2:. It definitely has its flaws/limitations/compromises (whatever one call it), but also its awesome capabilities.
    As usual, everything depending on intended use and mission profile.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,976 through 3,990 (of 4,136 total)