BriteCloud decoy set for Typhoon integration

Talked with Selex engineers at PAS 17. Thet claimed that it could decoy ANY missile for at least 7seconds. (they insisted on any when i asked about aircraft radar guided missiles)

Interesting data for point defense would be the minimum time to take off after alert…

Crash of a Mirage 2000 in Jura mountains

Of cours, i guess USA decided that grounding on pseudo moralistic reasons?

got the link please? µI missed that tweet. Thks

Late January, New CdG radars will be tested vs nEUROn

150 test fly for nEUROn

http://www.opex360.com/2019/01/05/le-demonstrateur-de-drone-de-combat-neuron-a-effectue-son-150e-vol-dessai/

– “A European military pilot said the nose jumped around while the aircraft was banking, which he took as a sign of faulty flight control software.”

This part is true, aswell as you’ll ee nose jumping up just before any turn. It is wrth noticing F-35 flew with a temporary FCS (not 3F) afaik.

You might think, this part is small and negligible but leading-edge-tracking (aka taking measurements not according to where the center of the return signal is but rather at the leading edge .All RGPO/RGPI cover pulse jamming tends to lag the target’s returns by some increment of time) is actually a very common ECCM method

Can’t agree more. Albeit not magic wand (neither active cancellation ). Leads to a loss of bunch of infomations.

All form of jamming (“active cancellation” included), need a certain level of J/S ratio to be effective, in that sense the jammer need to radiate at sufficient power to be effective.
Different kind of jamming will have different requirement for this J/S level

.

The idea is to send signal in a very narrow angle (way under 1°) so as not to need to much energy.

About perect knowledge (or so) of configurations/anle, each new config is tested for WEEKS in Solange testbed (anaechoic chamber).

Which makes active stealth a desirable tool, among many others.