dark light

halloweene

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 4,136 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2122339
    halloweene
    Participant

    Hallo, cut the silly posts…

    The funny part is i’m reportedly quoting a RAF pilot. Not so silly post šŸ˜‰

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2122341
    halloweene
    Participant

    It is not only that. How can anyone promise offset on a program structured on regular call for tenders? The analyst (honorary professor at war college) says that there is only vague promises. However, ha can be wrong.

    in reply to: 2019 F-35 News and Discussion #2122350
    halloweene
    Participant

    Some Belgium analysts already dubious about promised offsets from F-35 purchase…

    https://www.lecho.be/opinions/carte-blanche/les-retombees-du-contrat-des-f-35-en-question/10083694.html

    In addition, created in October 2016, the BELAG (Belgian Aeronautical Group) was called upon to contract the commitments of candidate sellers and to avoid regional disputes. Unlike BAe Systems, however, Lockheed Martin completely ignored BELAG,

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon discussion and news 2015 #2122351
    halloweene
    Participant

    Off info

    , 20:2 victories vs AMRAAM equipped Typhoon.

    in reply to: Mirage 2000 #2122352
    halloweene
    Participant

    Well that’s what I was referring to. They are taking an unguided weapon and turning it into a guided one. With three weapons on each station, that would add a lot of capability to the Mirage 2000 in my opinion…at least it would appear to.

    The original idea was 12 weapons on central station afaik.(at least the config shwon at Le Bourget). They are using cheap rockets sensors to guide BAP120 NG.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2122353
    halloweene
    Participant

    I think noone said that Rafale RCS was downed to zero. There will alays be a small delay between signal reception, DRFM, applying functions, reemitting. Front end pulse use from ennemy radar can partly mitigate that, but there will always be a degradation, and that is the idea (break the kill chain long enough so as to invalidate tactical situation).
    Oh and BAT120 test was succesful (nrelated)

    https://twitter.com/ThalesDefence/st…75368870756352

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2122381
    halloweene
    Participant

    Any attentive reading should help to temper down some of the verbal arrogance here.

    Wll you? God gracious.Gonna be a nice year!

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2122420
    halloweene
    Participant

    Basic capabilities:
    2 SPARC processors @ 33MHz
    STANAG 3910 avionics standard (just like Typhoon)
    Max bus bandwidth – 20Mbit/s
    Coded in Ada

    Hello. Albeit this document is about Rafale F1 (a stop gap Rafale so as to replace Crusaders) is interesting, it is outdated.

    http://www.portail-aviation.com/blog/2014/12/09/rafale-la-revolution-dans-levolution/

    subsystems are virtualized…

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2122447
    halloweene
    Participant

    2nd the lack of a coherent planing in system upgrade that led all sensor (apart from from the SPECTRA suite) to be removed/replaced.

    Say like… EOTS, EODAS etc.? Hilarious. The little loop on the LM doc is hat it is a little loop on a ppt. And a fairly hilarious one btw. Sensor fusion may itself change the radar mode e.g.?

    LM has NO idea on how sensor fusion is performed on Rafale. But what they show for “4th gen” is what happens for F-18.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2122492
    halloweene
    Participant

    Do not try eagle. For some religions, it is heretic to say that Rafale has a comprehensive data fusion engine is heretic. Same for active stealth, despite a conference where present NATO SACT (that is NATO military N°2) pronouncing thses words “balance between active and passive stealth” publicly.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2122506
    halloweene
    Participant

    quote DGA please. Data fusion is about algorithms that allow to use datat from several sensors to enhance each others. Nothing to do with emitting or whatever. Pointless. And how do you know that Rafale emits more in IR than F-35? I’ve seen them both during their demo in a crotale NG google. Won’t comment on F-135… And no, MICA is in no way using same interface as OSF.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2122510
    halloweene
    Participant

    Ah OK. No argument then. Datafusion is a powerful tool in order to circonvent poor funcioning of a sensor or another. And Rafale had datausion way before AESA…

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2122515
    halloweene
    Participant

    So istill donot get what argument allows you to say that Rafale donot have a”full” data fusion.

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2122547
    halloweene
    Participant

    Lost in tranlation. do you mean that one can’t fuse informations if it isn’t itself “stealthy”?

    in reply to: Rafale 2018 Thread: Europe's best Eurocanard #2122553
    halloweene
    Participant

    Fusion here is understood as the merge of raw data acquisition tracks from various sensors to generate unique target opportunities.

    And?

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 4,136 total)